| Literature DB >> 27243976 |
Antara Banerjee1, Subhadip Chakraborty1, Abhijit Chakraborty2, Saikat Chakrabarti2, Kunal Ray1,3.
Abstract
Glaucoma, the leading cause of irreversible blindness, appears in various forms. Mutations in CYP1B1 result in primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) by an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance while it acts as a modifier locus for primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). We investigated the molecular basis of the variable phenotypes resulting from the defects in CYP1B1 by using subclones of 23 CYP1B1 mutants reported in glaucoma patients, in a cell based system by measuring the dual activity of the enzyme to metabolize both retinol and 17β-estradiol. Most variants linked to POAG showed low steroid metabolism while null or very high retinol metabolism was observed in variants identified in PCG. We examined the translational turnover rates of mutant proteins after the addition of cycloheximide and observed that the levels of enzyme activity mostly corroborated the translational turnover rate. We performed extensive normal mode analysis and molecular-dynamics-simulations-based structural analyses and observed significant variation of fluctuation in certain segmental parts of the mutant proteins, especially at the B-C and F-G loops, which were previously shown to affect the dynamic behavior and ligand entry/exit properties of the cytochrome P450 family of proteins. Our molecular study corroborates the structural analysis, and suggests that the pathologic state of the carrier of CYP1B1 mutations is determined by the allelic state of the gene. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to dissect biological activities of CYP1B1 for correlation with congenital and adult onset glaucomas.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27243976 PMCID: PMC4887111 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Genotype to Phenotype analysis for CYP1B1 variants implicated in POAG and PCG.
| MutationStudied [ref.] | Disease (Genotype reported) | 2nd mutation reported (if any) | Enzyme Activity for mutant allele studied(% WT) | Inferred Enzyme Activity for Reported Genotype (% WT) | Genotype to Phenotype correlation (Yes/No) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCG | POAG | JOAG | Retinol | Steroid | Retinol | Steroid | |||
| p. P52L[ | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 70.97 ± 4.36 | PCG: No; | ||||||
| Hetero | Hetero | 50 | 85 | JOAG: No | |||||
| p.W57C[ | Homo | - | 221.71±16.19 | 337.84 ± 20.38 | 221 | 338 | PCG: Yes; | ||
| Hetero | 161 | 219 | JOAG: Yes | ||||||
| p. G61E[ | Homo | Homo | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0 | 0 | PCG: Yes; | ||
| Hetero | Hetero | R355fsX69 in PCG | 50 | 50 | POAG: Yes; | ||||
| Comp. Het. | Comp. Het | p.Y81N* in POAG | 0 for both | 5for Y81N; 0 for fs | JOAG:Yes for Homo, if escaped PCG due to incomplete penetrance | ||||
| p. R117W[ | - | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | PCG: No | ||||
| Comp. Het. | R469W* | 62 | 3 | ||||||
| p. R117P[ | - | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 70.63 ± 2.60 | PCG: Inconclusive (Biochem assay not done for R390H) | ||||
| Comp. Het. | R390H | N/A | N/A | ||||||
| p. M132R[ | Homo | - | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 35.35 ± 2.03 | 0 | 36 | PCG: Yes | |
| p. E229K[ | 137.28 ± 6.51 | 167.65 ± 34.37 | PCG: Nofor Comp Het with del mutation; Inconclusive with P193L (Biochem assay not done); | ||||||
| Hetero | Hetero | Hetero | 119 | 134 | POAG: Inconclusive; JOAG: No | ||||
| Comp. Het. | P193L, c.1064-1076del | 69 for del | 84 for del | ||||||
| p. F261L[ | - | - | 243.15±15.48 | 22.22 ± 1.86 | PCG: Yes | ||||
| Comp. Het. | R355fsX69 | 122 | 11 | ||||||
| p. D291G[ | Homo | - | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 41.12 ± 18.19 | 0 | 42 | PCG: Yes | |
| p. G329S[ | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | PCG: Yes | ||||||
| Comp. Het. | p.T325SfsX104 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| p. R368H[ | Homo | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 21.29 ± 2.40 | 0 | 22 | PCG: Yes; | |||
| Hetero | M292K * in POAG | 50 | 61 | POAG: Yes for Comp. Het; | |||||
| Comp. Het. | Comp. Het. | 1546dup10 frameshift in JOAG | 90for M292K; 0 for dup/fs | 11 for M292K; 11 for dup/fs | JOAG: Likely if accompanied by | ||||
| p. E387K[ | Homo | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0 | 0 | PCG: Yes. Inconclusive for Comp Het with P437L(Biochem assay not done); | ||
| 8182delG,268delSNF,P437L in PCG | JOAG: Inconclusive (Biochem assay not done for G232R) | ||||||||
| Comp. Het. | Comp. Het. | G232R in JOAG | 0for del | 0 for del | |||||
| p.R444Q[ | Homo | - | - | 274.15 ± 5.80 | 25.71± 2.65 | 274 | 26 | PCG: Yes | |
| Comp. Het. | 3964delC | 137 | 13 | ||||||
| p. R469W[ | Homo | - | - | 124.20 ±25.30 | 5.79 ± 1.04 | 124 | 6 | PCG:Yes | |
| p. S28W[ | - | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 600.41 ± 28.58 | POAG:.Yes | ||||
| Hetero | 50 | 350 | |||||||
| p. Y81N[ | G61E* | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 10.41 ± 5,50 | PCG: No; | |||||
| Hetero | Hetero | Hetero | 50 | 55 | POAG: Yes; | ||||
| Comp. Het. | 0 | 5 | JOAG: Yes if accompanied by | ||||||
| p. Q144H[ | - | - | 82.67 ± 6.36 | 14.99 ± 2.08 | POAG: Yes | ||||
| Hetero | 91 | 57 | |||||||
| p. Q144R[ | NA | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 84.80 ± 1.45 | 0 | 85 | PCG: Predicted for a homozygote; | ||
| Hetero | 50 | 92 | POAG: No | ||||||
| p. M292K[ | - | - | 181.50 ± 6.84 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | POAG: Yes | ||||
| Hetero | 141 | 50 | |||||||
| Comp. Het. | R368H* | 90 | 11 | ||||||
| p. V409F[ | - | - | 71.50 ± 12.55 | 151.49 ± 2.96 | POAG: Inconclusive | ||||
| Hetero | 86 | 126 | |||||||
| p. F445C[ | NA | - | 226.67 ± 14.53 | 55.03 ± 1.73 | 227 | 55 | PCG: Predicted for a homozygote; | ||
| Hetero | 164 | 78 | POAG: Inconclusive | ||||||
| p. R523T[ | - | Homo | 210.85 ± 9.93 | 8.21 ± 7.62 | 211 | 8 | JOAG: Yes with potentially incomplete penetrance of PCG. | ||
| p. D530G[ | - | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 88.19 ± 2.60 | POAG: No | ||||
| Hetero | 50 | 94 | |||||||
Column 1: Numbers in square brackets represent references to the publications reporting the cited study.
Column 2: Abbreviations: NA, not available (mutation reported without genotype); Homo, homozygote; Hetero, heterozygote; Comp Het, Compound heterozygote. Top, middle and bottom rows represent homozygous, heterozygous and compound heterozygous genotypes, respectively.
Column 3: Asterisks indicate that the biochemical assay results for those mutations are available (Please see S3 Table).
Column 4: Enzyme activities are shown as percent of the value obtained for the wild type allele ± SEM.
Column 5: Enzyme activities for the reported genotypes have been inferred based on an in vitro assay. Top, middle and bottom cells within column 5 in each row provide the inferred enzyme activities for homozygous, heterozygous and compound heterozygous genotypes, respectively. For homozyotes, the activity for the reported mutation (1st column) was considered. For heterozygotes, along with the activity of the reported mutation (1st column), the activity due to the 2nd allele (wildtype) was taken as 100% for calculation. For Compound Heterozygotes, the activity due to the 2ndmutation (if available) was used for calculation. For deletion/frame shift mutations the enzyme activity has been inferred to be null and the available assay results for the 2ndmutations (marked by asterisk) are given in S3 Table.
Column 6: Genotype to phenotype correlation is furnished for only reported genotypes except in two cases (Q144R and F445C) where the published report for PCG described a single mutation without the accompanying genotype. The basis for Genotype to Phenotype (G2P) correlation is furnished below:
CYP1B1 mediated PCG occurs in an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance.
Hence genotype to phenotype correlation has been proposed based on a biochemical assay done on retinol metabolism by CYP1B1 variant proteins. Both very low and a large excess of retinoic acid levels interfere with the developmental process. G2P correlation has been proposed based on the inferred enzyme activity for the reported genotypes only, based on our in vitro assay results for both mutations (in case of a homozygote or compound heterozygote). If our assay result was not available for the second mutation, an inference has been drawn for the deletion mutation as null activity, but no correlation was attempted for the missense mutation.
POAG is a complex disease, which is mostly caused by the interplay of multiple genes and the environment.
The role of CYP1B1 in the case of POAG has been examined based on the report that a low activity of CYP1B1 would help accumulate intracellular estradiol, resulting in the over expression of myocillin, and might lead to adult onset glaucoma. However, while the molecular basis for the pathogenesis of mutant MYOC is known, the potential for over expression of wild-type MYOC causing glaucoma is not yet shown. On the other hand, a higher level of activity of estradiol metabolism can lead to ROS generation and apoptosis, which could ultimately also lead to POAG pathogenesis.
JOAG is a complex disease caused by the interplay of multiple genes and the environment, and clustering in families is more common than in POAG.
No specific role of CYP1B1 has been described, except that it can cause JOAG by a digenic mode of inheritance along with MYOC mutation. However, on rare occasions, a homozygous CYP1B1 mutation has been reported in JOAG without any evidence for the molecular basis for causality.
Fig 1CYP1B1 mutants assessed for 17β estradiol and retinol metabolizing activities.
Forty-six hours post-transfection, the steroid metabolism activity of CYP1B1 was measured using the CYP450-GLO™ Assay kit. Protein expression of the wild type and mutant CYP1B1 at the time of enzyme assays was estimated by western blot (S3A Fig). Mutations reported to be associated with the type of glaucoma have been indicated by colored circles (POAG: red; PCG: blue; and POAG+PCG: green). To assay retinoic acid metabolism activity, HEK 293T cells were transiently transfected with different CYP1B1 variant clones and CYP1B1 expression was allowed for 12h. Next, cells were transfected with an inducible RARE-responsive firefly luciferase construct mixed with a constitutively expressing Renilla luciferase construct available in the SA-Bioscience Kit. After another 16h, retinol was added to each well at 2μM concentration. Six hours post retinol treatment, cells were washed and lysed with luciferase cell lysis buffer. Firefly (FF) and Renilla Luciferase (RL) luminescence was measured using the Dual Luciferase kit from Promega. Each assay was performed in technical triplicates and repeated three times. The FF–RLU value was normalized by dividing with RL–RLU value. Cells expressing wild type and mutant CYP1B1 proteins convert retinol into RA, which binds the inducible-RARE construct and luminescence is generated. The enzyme activity of the mutant proteins was expressed as a percentage of the activity retained as compared to the native (wild type) enzyme. Protein expression of the wild type and mutant CYP1B1 at the time of enzyme assays was estimated by western blot (S3B Fig) Data represent the mean ± SEM for a triplicate per group. Data were tested with an unpaired t test. Differences in mean values were assessed for statistical significance (*, p< 0.01). Experiments were repeated three times.
Fig 2Protein turnover rate of CYP1B1 constructs.
Transfected HEK 293T cells were treated with CHX for 12h to inhibit protein synthesis. Twenty μg cell extracts were probed sequentially, by western blot analysis, with appropriate antibodies: Myc (to detect recombinant CYP1B1) Cell Signaling Technology, USA] and β-actin (to serve as a loading control) (Sigma, USA). Immunoblots were scanned, and net pixel intensities of the bands were measured with Image J software. CYP1B1 values were normalized to β-actin, the mean values were taken for three separate transfections, and the relative amounts of CYP1B1 were expressed as a percentage of levels of WT at respective time points. Representative lanes from western blots are furnished on the right side of the panels. Mutations found in only POAG cases; Mutations found in both POAG and PCG cases; Mutations found in only PCG cases. Level of WT protein under similar conditions is shown in panel A. Data represent the mean ± SEM for a triplicate per group. Data were tested by an unpaired t test. Differences in mean were assessed for statistical significance (p< 0.01). Experiments were repeated three times.
Fig 3MD simulation analysis of the F261L and wild type CYP1B1 structures.
shows a similar distribution of the first three major principal components of F261L and wild type (WT) CYP1B1 structures, suggesting relatively unchanged functional motions in the F261L mutant as compared to the WT structure. shows the altered flexibility pattern of the F261L mutant as compared to wild type. The log2ratio is calculated as . Therefore a positive value indicates an increase in flexibility in the F261L mutant and a negative value indicates a decrease in flexibility as compared to WT CYP1B1. F261L mutant has a significantly altered flexibility pattern within the C-D, F and G'-H block regions, shown separately in the right hand side of the panel. shows the altered tunnels in two different orientations (top and bottom view) of the F261L and WT CYP1B1 structures. The upper panel of "Tunnel properties" shows the radius (in bar plot) and length (in black line) of the tunnels (Top view orientation) in the mutant (orange) and WT (green) structures while the lower panel shows the similar properties of tunnels observed in the bottom view orientation. shows docked retinol in the WT and F261L mutant CYP1B1 structures. The panel also shows an overall increase in binding energy in F261L mutant retinol binding observed through MD simulation.
Fig 4MD simulation analysis of the R117P and wild type CYP1B1 structures.
shows a multiple sequence alignment of CYP1B1 homologs. The red color indicates the conserved Arginine 117 position in other homologs. Thelower panel shows the structural importance of Arginine 117in their interaction with the O1A/O2A atom of the heme ligand. shows a similar distribution of first three major principal components of R117P and wild type (WT) CYP1B1 structures. Panel B shows that the R117P mutant possesses a significantly altered flexibility pattern within the B-C, G-H, and J-K block regions. shows the altered flexibility pattern in the R117P mutant as compared to WT. The log2 ratio is calculated as . Therefore, a positive value indicates an increase in flexibility in the R117P mutant and a negative value indicates a decrease in flexibility as compared to WT CYP1B1. The R117P mutant has a significantly altered flexibility pattern within the B-C, G-H and J-K block regions, shown separately in the right hand side of the panel. illustrate RMSD deviation and average bond angle deviation of the heme ligand in ΔRMSD and Δdegrees matrices, respectively. The difference matrices were calculated by subtracting RMSD and average bond angle values of mutant CYP1B1 from that of WT CYP1B1. The fluctuations and bond angle deviations in the initial stages of the MD simulation indicate a potential instability in the heme ligand binding affinity within the mutant protein.
Fig 5MD simulation analysis of the Q144R and wild type CYP1B1 structure.
shows the distribution of the first three major principal components of the Q144R and wild type (WT) structures. The distributions are observed to be different, suggesting an altered functional motion in the Q144R mutant. shows the altered flexibility pattern of the Q144R mutant as compared to WT. The log2 ratio is calculated as . Therefore a positive value indicates an increase in flexibility in the Q144R mutant and a negative value indicates a decrease in flexibility as compared to WT CYP1B1. The Q144R mutant has a significantly altered flexibility pattern within the C-D, F and G'-H block region, shown separately in the right hand side of the panel. shows the altered tunnels in two different orientations (top and bottom view) of the Q144R and WT CYP1B1 structures. The upper panel of "Tunnel properties" shows the radius (in bar plot) and length (in black line) of the tunnels (top view orientation) in the mutant (blue) and WT (green) structures. The lower panel shows the similar properties of the tunnels observed in the bottom view orientation. shows docked retinol in the WT and mutant CYP1B1 structures. The panel also shows an overall decrease in binding energy in retinol binding for the mutant protein, observed through MD simulation.
Fig 6MD simulation analysis of the Q144H and WT CYP1B1 structures.
shows marginally similar distributions of the first three major principal components of the Q144H and wild type (WT) CYP1B1 structures. shows that the Q144H mutant possesses a significantly altered flexibility pattern within the B-C, F-G and H block regions. The log2 ratio is calculated as . Therefore, a positive value indicates an increase in flexibility in the Q144H mutant and a negative value indicates a decrease in flexibility as compared to WT CYP1B1. The significantly altered flexible regions are shown separately in the right hand side of the panel. shows the altered tunnels in two different orientations (top and bottom view) of the Q144H and WT CYP1B1 structures. Interestingly no tunnel was observed in the top orientation of the Q144H structure. The upper panel of "Tunnel properties" shows the radius (in bar plot) and length (in black line) of the tunnels (Top view orientation) in the mutant (pink) and WT (green) structures. The lower panel shows similar properties of tunnels observed in the bottom view orientation. shows docked retinol in the WT and mutant CYP1B1 structures. The panel also shows an overall decrease in binding energy in retinol binding for the mutant protein, observed through MD simulation.
Fig 7Genotype to phenotype correlation for the role of CYP1B1 in glaucoma pathogenesis (PCG vs POAG).
The flowchart shows the potential activity of CYP1B1 variants for two different substrates (estradiol and retinol), as estimated by an in vitro cell based assay in HEK293T cells and attempted correlation of the biochemical activities (based on genotype) with potential glaucoma pathogenesis. Ref.(1)[18]; Ref.(2,3)[92, 93]; Ref.(4)[17]; Ref.(5,6)[17, 83].
Fig 8Summary of possible effects of mutations on CYP1B1 structure observed through MD simulation.