| Literature DB >> 33935712 |
Yizhen Tang1,2, Yiqiong Pan1,2, Yuhong Chen1,2, Xiangmei Kong1,2, Junyi Chen1,2, Hengli Zhang3, Guangxian Tang3, Jihong Wu1,2, Xinghuai Sun1,2,4.
Abstract
Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness globally characterized by progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and irreversible visual deficiency. As the most common type of glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) is currently an unmet medical need with limited therapy by lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). However, some patients continue to progress even though their IOP are controlled. Although early diagnosis and prompt treatment are crucial in preventing irreversible visual impairment, there are currently no biomarkers for screening POAG. Metabolomics has the advantages of illustrating the final downstream products of the genome and establishing the closest link to the phenotype. So far, there is no study investigating the metabolomic profiles in both aqueous humor and plasma of POAG patients. Therefore, to explore diagnostic biomarkers, unveil underlying pathophysiology and potential therapeutic strategies, a widely targeted metabolomic approach was applied using ultrahigh-resolution mass spectrometry with C18 liquid chromatography to characterize the metabolomic profiles in both aqueous humor and plasma of 28 POAG patients and 25 controls in our study. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was performed to determine differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) between POAG and age-matched controls. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the prediction accuracy of the DEMs. The correlation of DEMs with the clinical parameters was determined by Pearson correlation, and the metabolic pathways were analyzed using MetaboAnalyst 4.0. PLS-DA significantly separated POAG from controls with 22 DEMs in the aqueous humor and 11 DEMs in the plasma. Additionally, univariate ROC analysis and correlation analysis with clinical parameters revealed cyclic AMP (AUC = 0.87), 2-methylbenzoic acid (AUC = 0.75), 3'-sialyllactose (AUC = 0.73) in the aqueous humor and N-lac-phe (AUC = 0.76) in the plasma as potential biomarkers for POAG. Moreover, the metabolic profiles pointed towards the alteration in the purine metabolism pathway. In conclusion, the study identified potential and novel biomarkers for POAG by crosslinking the metabolomic profiles in aqueous humor and plasma and correlating with the clinical parameters. These findings have important clinical implications given that no biomarkers are currently available for glaucoma in the clinic, and the study provided new insights in exploring diagnostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic strategies of POAG by targeting metabolic pathways.Entities:
Keywords: aqueous humor; biomarker; mass spectrometry; metabolomics; plasma; primary open angle glaucoma
Year: 2021 PMID: 33935712 PMCID: PMC8080440 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.621146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Glaucoma medication and surgeries performed in the present study.
| POAG | Ctrl | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery | |||
| Trabeculectomy, % | 46 | 0 | |
| Drainage implant surgery, % | 29 | 0 | |
| Non-penetrating trabeculectomy, % | 11 | 0 | |
| Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation, % | 14 | 100 | |
| Glaucoma medication | |||
| Travoprost, % | 50 | - | |
| Brimonidine Tartrate, % | 50 | - | |
| Brinzolamide, % | 46.43 | - | |
| Brinzolamide and Timolol, % | 35.71 | - | |
| Bimatoprost, % | 32.14 | - | |
| Timolol, % | 10.71 | - | |
| Carteolol, % | 10.71 | - | |
| Mannitol, % | 7.14 | - | |
| Latanoprost, % | 3.57 | - | |
| Tafluprost, % | 3.57 | - | |
Categorical variables were presented as proportion.
Demographic data of enrolled POAG and control subjects.
| POAG | Ctrl |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 58.89 ± 14.9 | 65.60 ± 11.32 | 0.0735 |
| Female (%) | 43 | 58 | 0.404 |
| C/D | 0.9 (0.8, 0.9) | 0.3 (0.3, 0.4) | <0.001 |
| IOP (mmHg) | 22.97 ± 9.43 | 15.10 ± 2.13 | <0.001 |
| BCVA (logMAR) | 0.55 ± 0.45 | 1.2 ± 0.55 | 0.026 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.64 ± 2.08 | 25.12 ± 4.96 | 0.47 |
| ACD (mm) | 2.7 ± 0.39 | 3.06 ± 0.67 | 0.37 |
| AL (mm) | 24.27 ± 1.42 | 23.42 ± 0.64 | 0.041 |
| CCT (µm) | 525.96 ± 30.13 | 534.00 ± 24.04 | 0.34 |
| MD | 19 ± 8.4 | — | — |
AL, axial length; ACD, anterior chamber depth; BMI, body mass index; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; C/D, cup/disc ratio; CCT, central corneal thickness; IOP, intraocular pressure; MD, main defect. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD or median (lower quartile - upper quartile) according to the normality of the data. Categorical variables were presented as proportion. Statistical test:
Welch’s t–test.
Fisher's exact test.
Wilcoxon–Mann Whitney test.
FIGURE 1Metabolomic profile in the aqueous humor of POAG and control subjects. (A) PLS-DA score plot of the metabolites. (B)Volcano plot of variable importance projection scores (VIP). Red points labeled the differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) with VIPs >1, q < 0.05 and FC > 1.5. (C) Heatmap of DEMs in the aqueous humor between POAG and control. (D) Pathway enrichment analysis of DEMs in KEGG metabolites set. (E) ROC curve analysis of DEMs using PLS regression, random forest and logistic regression models.
Statistics, AUC scores and clinical relevance for DEMs in the aqueous humor.
| Metabolites | VIP | log2 (FC) |
| AUC | Clinical relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyclic Amp | 2.60 | −0.68 | <0.001 | 0.87 | 9 |
| 2-Methylbenzoic acid | 2.24 | −0.82 | 0.006 | 0.75 | 3 |
| 3’-Sialyllactose | 1.99 | 0.63 | 0.006 | 0.73 | 4 |
| Lysopc 18:0 | 2.32 | 0.82 | 0.03 | 0.71 | 0 |
| Dulcitol | 1.92 | 0.66 | 0.006 | 0.70 | 2 |
| Lysopc 15:0 | 2.55 | 0.80 | 0.031 | 0.70 | 0 |
| Hypoxanthine | 2.10 | −0.75 | 0.006 | 0.69 | 0 |
| Uric Acid | 3.24 | 1.63 | 0.009 | 0.68 | 0 |
| Phenyllactate (Pla) | 2.19 | 0.79 | 0.006 | 0.68 | 1 |
| Xanthosine | 1.90 | −0.65 | 0.03 | 0.66 | 9 |
| Lysopc 16:0 | 2.31 | 0.79 | 0.025 | 0.66 | 0 |
| Lysopc 18:3 | 2.32 | 0.76 | 0.03 | 0.66 | 0 |
| Hydroxyphenyllactic acid | 2.86 | 1.63 | 0.013 | 0.66 | 0 |
| Lysopa 16:0 | 2.05 | 0.84 | 0.03 | 0.66 | 0 |
| Lysopc 16:1 | 2.35 | 0.83 | 0.041 | 0.66 | 1 |
| Barbituric acid | 2.18 | 0.67 | 0.04 | 0.65 | 1 |
| L-3-Phenyllactic Acid | 2.60 | 0.77 | 0.013 | 0.64 | 0 |
| PAF C-16 | 2.29 | 0.73 | 0.037 | 0.60 | 0 |
| N6-Succinyl Adenosine | 3.25 | 1.51 | 0.012 | 0.60 | 0 |
| Hexadecanamide | 1.83 | −0.60 | 0.038 | 0.60 | 2 |
| Lysopc 18:1 | 2.42 | 0.81 | 0.034 | 0.58 | 0 |
| D-Sorbitol | 1.65 | 0.64 | 0.037 | 0.58 | 1 |
Clinical relevance: number of correlated clinical parameters in C/D; IOP; BCVA; AL; CCT; ACD; C/D A-Ratio; C/D V-Ratio; C/D H-Ratio; Rim Area; Disc Area; Cup Volume; GCC average thickness, GCC superior thickness; GCC inferior thickness; GCC-FLV; GCC-GLV; RNFL average thickness; RNFL superior thickness; RNFL inferior thickness and MD.
FIGURE 2Metabolomic biomarkers in the aqueous humor of POAG patients. (A) The expression of the metabolites biomarkers including cAMP, 3′-sialyllactose, 2-methylbenzoic acid, Dulcitol, xanthosine, lysopc 18:0 and lysopc 15:0. (B) Venn map of biomarker selection criteria (AUC > 0.7, clinical relevance ≥3) for DEMs-A. ***: p < 0.001, **: p < 0.01, *: p < 0.05 by unpaired t-test compared to controls. Data were represented in box-and-whisker plot.
Statistics, AUC scores and clinical relevance for DEMs in the plasma.
| Metabolites | VIP | log2 (FC) |
| AUC | Clinical relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-Propionic Acid | 1.87 | −0.79 | 0.047 | 0.82 | 0 |
| N-lactoyl-phenylalanine | 1.61 | −0.65 | 0.04 | 0.76 | 2 |
| 9-Hpode | 2.42 | −1.41 | 0.047 | 0.74 | 0 |
| D-Mannitol | 2.61 | 1.50 | 0.04 | 0.71 | 0 |
| Inosine | 3.18 | 5.72 | 0.04 | 0.70 | 1 |
| Hypoxanthine | 2.03 | 2.04 | 0.04 | 0.66 | 0 |
| Guanidinoethyl Sulfonate | 1.83 | −0.60 | 0.048 | 0.65 | 1 |
| Hypoxanthine-9-β-D-Arabinofuranoside | 2.98 | 5.14 | 0.04 | 0.65 | 1 |
| P-Aminobenzoate | 1.87 | 2.03 | 0.047 | 0.63 | 0 |
| Hydroxyacetone | 2.02 | −1.00 | 0.047 | 0.60 | 3 |
| 2-Aminoadipic Acid | 1.42 | −0.73 | 0.048 | 0.57 | 2 |
Clinical relevance: number of the correlated clinical parameters in C/D; IOP; BCVA; AL; CCT; ACD; C/D A-Ratio; C/D V-Ratio; C/D H-Ratio; Rim Area; Disc Area; Cup Volume; GCC average thickness, GCC superior thickness; GCC inferior thickness; GCC-FLV; GCC-GLV; RNFL average thickness; RNFL superior thickness; RNFL inferior thickness and MD.
FIGURE 4Metabolic biomarkers in the plasma of POAG patients. (A) The expression of the metabolites biomarkers including 9-hpode, N-lactoyl-phenylalanine, hydroxyacetone, inosine, 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionic acid, D-mannitol and 2-aminoadipic acid. (B) Venn map of biomarker selection criteria (AUC > 0.7, clinical relevance ≥2) for DEMs in the plasma. **: p < 0.01, *: p < 0.05 by unpaired t-test compared to controls. Data were represented in box-and-whisker plot.
The correlation of DEMs between aqueous humor and plasma.
| Metabolites | Correlation | Aqueous humor | Plasma | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r |
| VIP | log2 (FC) |
| VIP | log2 (FC) |
| |
| Barbituric acid | 0.84 | <0.001 | 2.2 | 0.67 | 0.005 | 0.77 | −0.074 | 0.46 |
| Lysopa 16:0 | 0.58 | 0.005 | 2 | 0.84 | 0.003 | 0.76 | 0.062 | 0.36 |
| N6-succinyl adenosine | −0.47 | 0.028 | 3.3 | 1.5 | <0.001 | 1.7 | −0.41 | 0.006 |
| N-lactoyl-phenylalanine | 0.46 | 0.03 | 0.67 | −0.033 | 0.8 | 1.6 | −0.65 | 0.001 |
| Cyclic AMP | 0.42 | 0.05 | 2.6 | −0.68 | <0.001 | 1.3 | −0.37 | 0.013 |
The correlation of each metabolite between aqueous humor and plasma was analyzed using Pearson correlation.
Statistics of the metabolites in POAG group compared to control group.
FIGURE 3Metabolomic profile in the plasma of POAG and control subjects. (A) PLS-DA score plot of the metabolites in POAG and control group. (B)Volcano plot of VIPs. Red points labeled the DEMs with VIPs >1, q < 0.05 and FC > 1.5. (C) Heatmap of DEMs in the plasma between POAG and control group. (D) Pathway enrichment analysis of DEMs in KEGG metabolites set. (E) ROC curve analysis of DEMs with PLS regression, random forest and logistic regression models.