| Literature DB >> 27228122 |
Duy M Dinh1,2, Balamurugan Ramadass3, Deepthi Kattula3, Rajiv Sarkar3, Philip Braunstein4, Albert Tai5, Christine A Wanke1,2,3, Soha Hassoun4, Anne V Kane1, Elena N Naumova2,3,6, Gagandeep Kang2,5, Honorine D Ward1,2,3.
Abstract
Stunting or reduced linear growth is very prevalent in low-income countries. Recent studies have demonstrated a causal relationship between alterations in the gut microbiome and moderate or severe acute malnutrition in children in these countries. However, there have been no primary longitudinal studies comparing the intestinal microbiota of persistently stunted children to that of non-stunted children in the same community. In this pilot study, we characterized gut microbial community composition and diversity of the fecal microbiota of 10 children with low birth weight and persistent stunting (cases) and 10 children with normal birth weight and no stunting (controls) from a birth cohort every 3 months up to 2 years of age in a slum community in south India. There was an increase in diversity indices (P <0.0001) with increasing age in all children. However, there were no differences in diversity indices or in the rates of their increase with increasing age between cases and controls. The percent relative abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum was higher in stunted compared to control children at 12 months of age (P = 0.043). There was an increase in the relative abundance of this phylum with increasing age in all children (P = 0.0380) with no difference in the rate of increase between cases and controls. There was a decrease in the relative abundance of Proteobacteria (P = 0.0004) and Actinobacteria (P = 0.0489) with increasing age in cases. The microbiota of control children was enriched in probiotic species Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus mucosae, whereas that of stunted children was enriched in inflammogenic taxa including those in the Desulfovibrio genus and Campylobacterales order. Larger, longitudinal studies on the compositional and functional maturation of the microbiome in children are needed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27228122 PMCID: PMC4881907 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline socio-demographic and clinical data in cases and controls.
| Parameter | Controls | Cases | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3/10 (30%) | 3/10 (30%) | 1.00 | |
| 40 (39.7–40.8) | 37.8 (36.8–40.2) | 0.19 | |
| 2.9 (2.7–3.3) | 2.1 (1.9–2.3) | ||
| 6/10 (60%) | 6/10 (60%) | 1.00 | |
| 4/10 (40%) | 4/10 (40%) | 1.00 | |
| 3.8 (1.8–5.6) | 3.3 (1.4–5.2) | 0.762 | |
| 1/10 (10%) | 2/10 (20%) | 1.00 | |
| 5/10 (50%) | 4/10 (40%) | 0.5 | |
| 0/10 (0%) | 10/10 (100%) | ||
| 0 | 66 | - | |
| 0/10 (0%) | 9/10 (90%) | ||
| 19 | 81 | ||
| 0/10 (0%) | 3/10 (30%) | 0.2105 | |
| 0 | 8 | - | |
| 1/10 (10%) | 4/10 (40%) | 0.3034 | |
| 1 | 6 | 0.09 |
1information missing for one subject
2assessed using a 5 point scale modified from the Kuppuswamy scale
3Fisher’s exact test
4Mann-Whitney test. Statistically significant P values (P <0.05) are in bold type
Fig 1Growth trajectories in cases and controls: Mean height, weight, HAZ and WHZ scores and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were plotted over time from birth to 24 months of age.
HAZ, Height for Age, WHZ, Weight for Height, UCI, Upper Confidence Interval, LCI, Lower Confidence Interval.
Fig 2Alpha diversity indices in cases and controls: Alpha diversity indices (Chao, Equitability, observed OTUs, Shannon and Phylogenetic Diversity (PD) were computed in QIIME.
regression model showing the increase in individual diversity indices over time from 3 to 24 months of age.
Age related effect on alpha diversity indices*.
| All | 3 RR Months | UCI | LCI | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1258 | 0.1624 | 0.0891 | ||
| 0.1298 | 0.1681 | 0.0915 | ||
| 0.0609 | 0.0840 | 0.0377 | ||
| 0.0376 | 0.0552 | 0.0200 | ||
| 0.1141 | 0.1455 | 0.0827 | ||
| 0.1255 | 0.1597 | 0.0912 | ||
| 0.1295 | 0.1646 | 0.0945 | ||
| 0.0606 | 0.0785 | 0.0428 | ||
| 0.0375 | 0.0506 | 0.0243 | ||
| 0.1139 | 0.1428 | 0.0850 | ||
| 0.1381 | 0.1769 | 0.0994 | ||
| 0.1400 | 0.1811 | 0.0988 | ||
| 0.0729 | 0.1007 | 0.0451 | ||
| 0.0476 | 0.0693 | 0.0258 | ||
| 0.1241 | 0.1555 | 0.0927 |
*Analyzed using a linear mixed effects regression model, constructed for each index and adjusted for birth weight and gender. RR, relative risk; UCI, upper confidence interval; LCI, lower confidence interval. Statistically significant P values (P <0.05) are in bold type. The regression coefficients associated with age are expressed as relative risks (RR), or the degree of change in each index that occurred over a 3-month period. To illustrate the degree of uncertainty, the estimates of RR are accompanied by values of the lower and upper confidence intervals (LCI and UCI, respectively). For each model we also provide information related to statistical significance (p-value) for the estimates with respect to a hypothesis that detected associations likely are not by chance. For example, interpretation of the first row of results can be read as follows: The Chao1 diversity index is likely to increase significantly by 0.1258 within the 3 month time interval.
Fig 3Relative abundance of major phyla in cases and controls.
a: Average relative abundance of major phyla at each 3 monthly time point. b: inear regression model showing the change in relative abundance of each major phylum over time from 3 to 24 months of age.
Age-related effect on the relative abundance of major phyla*.
| 3 RR Month | UCI | LCI | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -7.97E-03 | 6.23E-03 | -2.23E-02 | 0.2694 | |
| 1.62E-02 | 3.17E-02 | 7.43E-04 | ||
| 1.51E-03 | 1.79E-02 | -1.49E-02 | 0.8550 | |
| -1.71E-02 | 9.95E-04 | -3.52E-02 | ||
| -7.89E-03 | 4.26-E03 | -2.00E-02 | 0.1987 | |
| 1.60E-02 | 3.03E-02 | 1.79E-03 | ||
| 1.63E-03 | 1.96E-02 | -1.64E-02 | 0.8574 | |
| -1.69E-02 | 2.01E-03 | -3.58E-02 | ||
| -1.61E-02 | 8.45E-05 | -3.23E-02 | ||
| 3.31E-02 | 4.94E-02 | 1.67E-02 | ||
| 1.75E-02 | 3.56E-02 | -5.26E-04 | ||
| -3.39E-02 | -1.49E-02 | -5.29E-02 |
*Analyzed using a linear mixed effects model, adjusted for birth weight and gender. Please see footnote to Table 2 for explanation of results. RR, relative risk; UCI, upper confidence interval; LCI, lower confidence interval. Statistically significant P values (P <0.05) are in bold type and those approaching statistical significance are in italics.
Fig 4Differentially abundant taxa between cases and controls.
a: Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) cladogram of differentially abundant taxa in cases and controls [phylum (p), class (c), order (o), family (f), genera (g), species (s)]. b: Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) scores of differentially abundant taxa in cases and controls. The LDA score indicates the effect size and ranking of each differentially abundant taxon.
Age-related effect on the relative abundance of differentially abundant taxa*.
| All | 3 RR Months | UCI | LCI | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.96E-02 | -8.14E-03 | -3.10E-02 | ||
| -2.01E-04 | -3.58E-05 | -3.67E-04 | ||
| 1.49E-03 | 3.02E-03 | -3.99E-05 | ||
| 2.30E-03 | 4.62E-03 | -3.07E-05 | ||
| 4.99E-03 | 8.78E-03 | 1.19E-03 | ||
| -1.96E-02 | -8.47E-03 | -3.07E-02 | ||
| -2.01E-04 | -2.62E-05 | -3.76E-04 | ||
| 2.32E-03 | 4.65E-03 | -2.02E-05 | ||
| -1.94E-02 | -7.15E-03 | -3.16E-02 | ||
| -2.02E-04 | -4.47E-05 | -3.60E-04 | ||
| 5.56E-03 | 9.45E-03 | 1.66E-03 | ||
| 2.53E-03 | 4.55E-03 | 5.10E-04 | ||
| 3.09E-03 | 5.61E-03 | 5.75E-04 |
*identified by LEfSe at all time points combined. Analyzed using a linear mixed effect model adjusted for birth weight and gender. Please see footnote to Table 2 for explanation of results. Taxa whose relative abundance decreased over time are indicated with a negative sign. RR, relative risk, UCI, upper confidence interval, LCI, lower confidence interval. p, phylum; o, order, c, class, f, family, g, genus, s, species; Phyla to which specific taxa belong are indicated in brackets; A, Actinobateria, F, Firmicutes. Statistically significant P values (P <0.05) are in bold type and those approaching statistical significance are in italics.