Amanda L Thompson1,2,3, Kelly M Houck1, Johanna R Jahnke1,3. 1. Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2. Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Global increases in caesarean deliveries are exposing more infants to perinatal environments that are evolutionarily novel and potentially increasing their risks for inflammatory conditions. Yet, the pathways linking caesareans to later health outcomes are not well understood, particularly in dual burden contexts. We test two of the hypothesized pathways, altered immune function and gut microbiota, which may link delivery mode to later health outcomes and test whether these associations persist when controlling for postnatal nutritional and pathogenic exposures. METHODS: Data come from infants, aged 0 to 2 (n = 41), and young children, aged 2 to 11 (n = 135), from the Galápagos, Ecuador. Differences in morbidity, C-reactive protein (CRP), and gut microbiota by delivery type were tested using linear and logistic regression models adjusted for nutritional and pathogenic exposures and infant age. RESULTS: Over half of infants and over 40% of children were delivered by caesarean. Morbidity and CRP did not differ between infants or children born by caesarean or vaginally. Microbial taxa abundance differed by delivery mode. Infants born by caesarean had a higher abundance of Firmicutes and a lower relative abundance of Bacteroidales. Children born by caesarean had a higher abundance of Proteobacteria and Enterobacteriales. These differences remained after adjustment for environmental exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Caesarean delivery is associated with differences in gut microbiota across childhood even in this dual burden context. Our results highlight the importance of examining caesarean delivery across diverse contexts to better understand the impact of perinatal interventions on short- and longer-term health outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: Global increases in caesarean deliveries are exposing more infants to perinatal environments that are evolutionarily novel and potentially increasing their risks for inflammatory conditions. Yet, the pathways linking caesareans to later health outcomes are not well understood, particularly in dual burden contexts. We test two of the hypothesized pathways, altered immune function and gut microbiota, which may link delivery mode to later health outcomes and test whether these associations persist when controlling for postnatal nutritional and pathogenic exposures. METHODS: Data come from infants, aged 0 to 2 (n = 41), and young children, aged 2 to 11 (n = 135), from the Galápagos, Ecuador. Differences in morbidity, C-reactive protein (CRP), and gut microbiota by delivery type were tested using linear and logistic regression models adjusted for nutritional and pathogenic exposures and infant age. RESULTS: Over half of infants and over 40% of children were delivered by caesarean. Morbidity and CRP did not differ between infants or children born by caesarean or vaginally. Microbial taxa abundance differed by delivery mode. Infants born by caesarean had a higher abundance of Firmicutes and a lower relative abundance of Bacteroidales. Children born by caesarean had a higher abundance of Proteobacteria and Enterobacteriales. These differences remained after adjustment for environmental exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Caesarean delivery is associated with differences in gut microbiota across childhood even in this dual burden context. Our results highlight the importance of examining caesarean delivery across diverse contexts to better understand the impact of perinatal interventions on short- and longer-term health outcomes.
Authors: Giovanni Almanzar; Jörn Schönlaub; Angelika Hammerer-Lercher; Christian Koppelstaetter; David Bernhard; Martina Prelog Journal: Early Hum Dev Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: Giacomo Biasucci; Monica Rubini; Sara Riboni; Lorenzo Morelli; Elena Bessi; Cristiana Retetangos Journal: Early Hum Dev Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: Bing He; Weifeng Xu; Paul A Santini; Alexandros D Polydorides; April Chiu; Jeannelyn Estrella; Meimei Shan; Amy Chadburn; Vincenzo Villanacci; Alessandro Plebani; Daniel M Knowles; Maria Rescigno; Andrea Cerutti Journal: Immunity Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Meghan B Azad; Theodore Konya; Heather Maughan; David S Guttman; Catherine J Field; Radha S Chari; Malcolm R Sears; Allan B Becker; James A Scott; Anita L Kozyrskyj Journal: CMAJ Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Shama Virani; Dana C Dolinoy; Sindhu Halubai; Tamara R Jones; Steve E Domino; Laura S Rozek; Muna S Nahar; Vasantha Padmanabhan Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2012-06-09 Impact factor: 6.551
Authors: Camille C Cioffi; Hannah F Tavalire; Jenae M Neiderhiser; Brendan Bohannan; Leslie D Leve Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 3.240