Literature DB >> 27220996

A unified account of categorical effects in phonetic perception.

Yakov Kronrod1,2, Emily Coppess3, Naomi H Feldman4.   

Abstract

Categorical effects are found across speech sound categories, with the degree of these effects ranging from extremely strong categorical perception in consonants to nearly continuous perception in vowels. We show that both strong and weak categorical effects can be captured by a unified model. We treat speech perception as a statistical inference problem, assuming that listeners use their knowledge of categories as well as the acoustics of the signal to infer the intended productions of the speaker. Simulations show that the model provides close fits to empirical data, unifying past findings of categorical effects in consonants and vowels and capturing differences in the degree of categorical effects through a single parameter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; Categorical perception; Perceptual magnet effect; Rational analysis; Speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27220996     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1049-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  74 in total

1.  Measuring the perceptual magnet effect in the perception of /i/ by German listeners.

Authors:  E Diesch; P Iverson; A Kettermann; C Siebert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1999

2.  Different timescales for the neural coding of consonant and vowel sounds.

Authors:  Claudia A Perez; Crystal T Engineer; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Ryan S Carraway; Matthew S Perry; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Evolving theories of vowel perception.

Authors:  W Strange
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Face familiarity, distinctiveness, and categorical perception.

Authors:  Adriana Angeli; Jules Davidoff; Tim Valentine
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation.

Authors:  F H Guenther; M N Gjaja
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1973-06-01

7.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling.

Authors:  P Iverson; P K Kuhl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Anticipatory coarticulation facilitates word recognition in toddlers.

Authors:  Tristan Mahr; Brianna T M McMillan; Jenny R Saffran; Susan Ellis Weismer; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-11

10.  On prototypes and phonetic categories: a critical assessment of the perceptual magnet effect in speech perception.

Authors:  S E Lively; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Matthew B Winn; Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech.

Authors:  Ray D Kent; Carrie Rountrey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Comparing non-native and native speech: Are L2 productions more variable?

Authors:  Xin Xie; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Mice can learn phonetic categories.

Authors:  Jonny L Saunders; Michael Wehr
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Transformation of a temporal speech cue to a spatial neural code in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Neal P Fox; Matthew Leonard; Matthias J Sjerps; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback lacks an explicit component: Reduced adaptation in adults who stutter reflects limitations in implicit sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Ludo Max
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Perceptual Cue Weighting Is Influenced by the Listener's Gender and Subjective Evaluations of the Speaker: The Case of English Stop Voicing.

Authors:  Alan C L Yu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-20

8.  The Role of Temporal Acoustic Exaggeration in High Variability Phonetic Training: A Behavioral and ERP Study.

Authors:  Bing Cheng; Xiaojuan Zhang; Siying Fan; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-24

9.  Serial reproduction reveals the geometry of visuospatial representations.

Authors:  Thomas A Langlois; Nori Jacoby; Jordan W Suchow; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Do Infants Really Learn Phonetic Categories?

Authors:  Naomi H Feldman; Sharon Goldwater; Emmanuel Dupoux; Thomas Schatz
Journal:  Open Mind (Camb)       Date:  2021-11-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.