Literature DB >> 31067917

Mice can learn phonetic categories.

Jonny L Saunders1, Michael Wehr1.   

Abstract

Speech is perceived as a series of relatively invariant phonemes despite extreme variability in the acoustic signal. To be perceived as nearly-identical phonemes, speech sounds that vary continuously over a range of acoustic parameters must be perceptually discretized by the auditory system. Such many-to-one mappings of undifferentiated sensory information to a finite number of discrete categories are ubiquitous in perception. Although many mechanistic models of phonetic perception have been proposed, they remain largely unconstrained by neurobiological data. Current human neurophysiological methods lack the necessary spatiotemporal resolution to provide it: speech is too fast, and the neural circuitry involved is too small. This study demonstrates that mice are capable of learning generalizable phonetic categories, and can thus serve as a model for phonetic perception. Mice learned to discriminate consonants and generalized consonant identity across novel vowel contexts and speakers, consistent with true category learning. A mouse model, given the powerful genetic and electrophysiological tools for probing neural circuits available for them, has the potential to powerfully augment a mechanistic understanding of phonetic perception.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31067917      PMCID: PMC6910010          DOI: 10.1121/1.5091776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  42 in total

1.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; K A Williams; F Lacerda; K N Stevens; B Lindblom
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Tracing the emergence of categorical speech perception in the human auditory system.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Sylvain Moreno; Claude Alain
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Neural processing of natural sounds.

Authors:  Frédéric E Theunissen; Julie E Elie
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 5.  Linear correlates in the speech signal: the orderly output constraint.

Authors:  H M Sussman; D Fruchter; J Hilbert; J Sirosh
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

7.  The neuroethology of primate vocal communication: substrates for the evolution of speech.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Discrimination of synthetic full-formant and sinewave/ra-la/continua by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

Authors:  R J Dooling; C T Best; S D Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Computation in dynamically bounded asymmetric systems.

Authors:  Ueli Rutishauser; Jean-Jacques Slotine; Rodney Douglas
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.