Literature DB >> 23226880

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

David B Pisoni1.   

Abstract

Recognition memory for consonants and vowels selected from within and between phonetic categories was examined in a delayed comparison discrimination task. Accuracy of discrimination for synthetic vowels selected from both within and between categories was inversely related to the magnitude of the comparison interval. In contrast, discrimination of synthetic stop consonants remained relatively stable both within and between categories. The results indicate that differences in discrimination between consonants and vowels are primarily due to the differential availability of auditory short-term memory for the acoustic cues distinguishing these two classes of speech sounds. The findings provide evidence for distinct auditory and phonetic memory codes in speech perception.

Entities:  

Year:  1973        PMID: 23226880      PMCID: PMC3515632          DOI: 10.3758/BF03214136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

2.  Auditory and Phonetic Processes in Speech Perception: Evidence from a Dichotic Study().

Authors:  Michael Studdert-Kennedy; Donald Shankweiler; David Pisoni
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Retroactive interference in short-term recognition memory for pitch.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-01

6.  Some characteristics of perception in the speech mode.

Authors:  A M Liberman
Journal:  Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1970

7.  Theoretical notes. Motor theory of speech perception: a reply to Lane's critical review.

Authors:  M Studdert-Kennedy; A M Liberman; K S Harris; F S Cooper
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Hemispheric specialization for speech perception.

Authors:  M Studdert-Kennedy; D Shankweiler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Crosslanguage study of vowel perception.

Authors:  K N Stevens; S E Ohman
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1969 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.500

10.  Phonemic similarity and interference in short-term memory for single letters.

Authors:  W A Wickelgren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-03
  10 in total
  94 in total

Review 1.  Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.

Authors:  I Neath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

2.  Analysis and analogy in the perception of vowels.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Jennifer M Fellowes; Eva Y Blumenthal; Dalia Shoretz Nagel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

3.  Is color "categorical perception" really perceptual?

Authors:  Michael Pilling; Alison Wiggett; Emre Ozgen; Ian R L Davies
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

4.  Advantages and disadvantages of phonological similarity in serial recall and serial recognition of nonwords.

Authors:  Arild Lian; Paul Johan Karlsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

5.  Impaired categorical perception of lexical tones in Mandarin-speaking congenital amusics.

Authors:  Cunmei Jiang; Jeff P Hamm; Vanessa K Lim; Ian J Kirk; Yufang Yang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

6.  Different timescales for the neural coding of consonant and vowel sounds.

Authors:  Claudia A Perez; Crystal T Engineer; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Ryan S Carraway; Matthew S Perry; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report.

Authors:  J S Logan; S E Lively; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Modulation sensitivity in the perceptual organization of speech.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Emily F Thomas; Kathryn R Dubowski; Stavroula M Koinis; Natalie A C Porter; Nina U Paddu; Marina Moskalenko; Yael S Grossman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Categorical perception of speech by children with specific language impairments.

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady; Keith R Kluender; Julia L Evans
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Success and failure of new speech category learning in adulthood: consequences of learned Hebbian attractors in topographic maps.

Authors:  Gautam K Vallabha; James L McClelland
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.