Literature DB >> 27220769

Two Ears Are Not Always Better than One: Mandatory Vowel Fusion Across Spectrally Mismatched Ears in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Lina A J Reiss1, Jessica L Eggleston2, Emily P Walker2, Yonghee Oh2.   

Abstract

Hearing loss and auditory prostheses can alter auditory processing by inducing large pitch mismatches and broad pitch fusion between the two ears. Similar to integration of incongruent inputs in other sensory modalities, the mismatched, fused pitches are often averaged across ears for simple stimuli. Here, we measured parallel effects on complex stimulus integration using a new technique based on vowel classification in five bilateral hearing aid users and eight bimodal cochlear implant users. Continua between five pairs of synthetic vowels were created by varying the first formant spectral peak while keeping the second formant constant. Comparison of binaural and monaural vowel classification functions for each vowel pair continuum enabled visualization of the following frequency-dependent integration trends: (1) similar monaural and binaural functions, (2) ear dominance, (3) binaural averaging, and (4) binaural interference. Hearing aid users showed all trends, while bimodal cochlear implant users showed mostly ear dominance or interference. Interaural pitch mismatches, frequency ranges of binaural pitch fusion, and the relative weightings of pitch averaging across ears were also measured using tone and/or electrode stimulation. The presence of both large interaural pitch mismatches and broad pitch fusion was not sufficient to predict vowel integration trends such as binaural averaging or interference. The way that pitch averaging was weighted between ears also appears to be important for determining binaural vowel integration trends. Abnormally broad spectral fusion and the associated phoneme fusion across mismatched ears may underlie binaural speech perception interference observed in hearing aid and cochlear implant users.

Keywords:  bimodal cochlear implant; binaural integration; cochlear implant; fusion; hearing aid; hearing loss; pitch; speech; vowel

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27220769      PMCID: PMC4940290          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0570-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  37 in total

1.  Binocular fusion of luminance, color, motion and flicker--two eyes are worse than one.

Authors:  Stuart Anstis; Brian Rogers
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Kathryn S Schwartz; Colleen M Noe; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Prediction of speech recognition from audibility in older listeners with hearing loss: effects of age, amplification, and background noise.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kumiko T Boike; Kerry Witherell; Kelly Tremblay
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Dichotic pitch fusion.

Authors:  G van den Brink; K Sintnicolaas; W S van Stam
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Are two ears not better than one?

Authors:  Rachel A McArdle; Mead Killion; Monica A Mennite; Theresa H Chisolm
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Monaural deprivation disrupts development of binaural selectivity in auditory midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Maria V Popescu; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Exploring the factors influencing discontinued hearing aid use in patients with unilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick; Stéphanie Leblanc
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-03-14

Review 9.  The role of sound in adult and developmental auditory cortical plasticity.

Authors:  Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Investigating interaural frequency-place mismatches via bimodal vowel integration.

Authors:  François Guérit; Sébastien Santurette; Josef Chalupper; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  17 in total

1.  Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Konstantin Wiebe; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-27

2.  Binaural Pitch Fusion in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Jennifer R Fowler; Curtis L Hartling; Yonghee Oh
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Binaural pitch fusion: Pitch averaging and dominance in hearing-impaired listeners with broad fusion.

Authors:  Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Binaural pitch fusion: Comparison of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Corey S Shayman; Emily P Walker; Keri O Bennett; Jennifer R Fowler; Curtis L Hartling; Bess Glickman; Michael R Lasarev; Yonghee Oh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Community network for deaf scientists.

Authors:  Henry J Adler; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Samuel R Atcherson; Nathan Barlow; Marc A Brennan; John V Brigande; Brad N Buran; Juergen-Theodor Fraenzer; Jonathan E Gale; Frederick J Gallun; Sarah D Gluck; Ray L Goldsworthy; Joseph Heng; Ariel Edward Hight; Julia J Huyck; Barry D Jacobson; Takatoshi Karasawa; Damir Kovačić; Stacey R Lim; Alexander K Malone; Lisa S Nolan; Dominic V Pisano; Valluri R M Rao; Robert M Raphael; J Tilak Ratnanather; Lina A J Reiss; Chad V Ruffin; Adam T Schwalje; Moaz Sinan; Patricia Stahn; Peter S Steyger; Stephen J Tang; Viral D Tejani; Victor Wong
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Nathaniel R Peterson; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Xin Yang; Jason Parton
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  Restoration of spatial hearing in adult cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Keng Moua; Shelly Godar; Alan Kan; Sara M Misurelli; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Binaural Pitch Fusion in Children With Normal Hearing, Hearing Aids, and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Curtis L Hartling; Jennifer R Fowler; Gemaine N Stark; Bess Glickman; Morgan Eddolls; Yonghee Oh; Katrina Ramsey; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Binaural Pitch Fusion: Binaural Pitch Averaging in Cochlear Implant Users With Broad Binaural Fusion.

Authors:  Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Binaural pitch fusion: Effects of sound level in listeners with normal hearing.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Bess Glickman; Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.