Brittney A Frankel1, Tara F Bishop2,3,4. 1. Weill Cornell Medicine, 402 E. 67th St., Room LA-215, New York, NY, 10021, USA. baf2011@med.cornell.edu. 2. Division of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medicine, 402 E. 67th St., Room LA-215, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Starting in 2015, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requires all Medicare providers to report quality measures through Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) or incur a 1.5 % financial penalty. Research indicates that physicians believe this reporting does not lead to high quality care; however, little research has examined what PQRS actually measures, which is reflective of the physicians and patient disease populations being assessed. OBJECTIVES: (1) Identify the proportion of measures that apply to different medical specialties, types of quality measurement, and National Quality Strategy (NQS) priorities. (2) Identify how different specialties are required to measure quality and NQS priorities. (3) Compare the 2011 and 2015 measures. DESIGN AND MAIN MEASURES: This was a categorical qualitative analysis of 2011 and 2015 PQRS measures. One hundred and ninety-eight and 254 individual measures, respectively, were analyzed by three domains: medical specialty measured, type of measure, and NQS priority category. KEY RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2015, the type of measures changed significantly, with fewer processes (85.4 % vs. 66.5 %, p < 0.001) and more outcomes (12.6 % vs. 29.1 %, p < 0.001). The measures showed no significant specialty or NQS category differences. For subcategories within each specialty in 2015, differences in measure type were statistically significant: surgery had the highest percentage of outcomes (61.1 %) compared to 21.7 % of internal medicine and 5.9 % of obstetrics/gynecology. For NQS categories, internal medicine had the highest percentage of effective clinical care measures (68.5 %), compared to 22.2 % in surgery. Surgery had the highest percentage of patient safety (31.9 %) and communication and care coordination measures (27.8 %) compared with internal medicine (5.4 % and 6.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that PQRS measures include many medical specialties and significantly more outcomes in recent years, particularly for surgery. PQRS still lacks sufficient measures for half of NQS priorities and sufficient outcomes to assess internal medicine and obstetrics/gynecology. CMS must continue to improve PQRS measures to better assess and encourage high-quality care for all Americans.
BACKGROUND: Starting in 2015, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requires all Medicare providers to report quality measures through Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) or incur a 1.5 % financial penalty. Research indicates that physicians believe this reporting does not lead to high quality care; however, little research has examined what PQRS actually measures, which is reflective of the physicians and patient disease populations being assessed. OBJECTIVES: (1) Identify the proportion of measures that apply to different medical specialties, types of quality measurement, and National Quality Strategy (NQS) priorities. (2) Identify how different specialties are required to measure quality and NQS priorities. (3) Compare the 2011 and 2015 measures. DESIGN AND MAIN MEASURES: This was a categorical qualitative analysis of 2011 and 2015 PQRS measures. One hundred and ninety-eight and 254 individual measures, respectively, were analyzed by three domains: medical specialty measured, type of measure, and NQS priority category. KEY RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2015, the type of measures changed significantly, with fewer processes (85.4 % vs. 66.5 %, p < 0.001) and more outcomes (12.6 % vs. 29.1 %, p < 0.001). The measures showed no significant specialty or NQS category differences. For subcategories within each specialty in 2015, differences in measure type were statistically significant: surgery had the highest percentage of outcomes (61.1 %) compared to 21.7 % of internal medicine and 5.9 % of obstetrics/gynecology. For NQS categories, internal medicine had the highest percentage of effective clinical care measures (68.5 %), compared to 22.2 % in surgery. Surgery had the highest percentage of patient safety (31.9 %) and communication and care coordination measures (27.8 %) compared with internal medicine (5.4 % and 6.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that PQRS measures include many medical specialties and significantly more outcomes in recent years, particularly for surgery. PQRS still lacks sufficient measures for half of NQS priorities and sufficient outcomes to assess internal medicine and obstetrics/gynecology. CMS must continue to improve PQRS measures to better assess and encourage high-quality care for all Americans.
Authors: Alyna T Chien; Kristen Wroblewski; Cheryl Damberg; Thomas R Williams; Dolores Yanagihara; Yelena Yakunina; Lawrence P Casalino Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Robert J Panzer; Richard S Gitomer; William H Greene; Patricia Reagan Webster; Kevin R Landry; Charles A Riccobono Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Bettina Berman; Valerie P Pracilio; Albert Crawford; William R Behm; Richard Jacoby; David B Nash; Neil I Goldfarb Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Eric Kessell; Vishaal Pegany; Beth Keolanui; Brent D Fulton; Richard M Scheffler; Stephen M Shortell Journal: J Health Polit Policy Law Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 2.265
Authors: Gregg S Meyer; Eugene C Nelson; David B Pryor; Brent James; Stephen J Swensen; Gary S Kaplan; Jed I Weissberg; Maureen Bisognano; Gary R Yates; Gordon C Hunt Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Stephanie MacLeod; Kay Schwebke; Kevin Hawkins; Joann Ruiz; Emma Hoo; Charlotte S Yeh Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 2.459