Literature DB >> 26124294

Review of Medicare, Medicaid, and Commercial Quality of Care Measures: Considerations for Assessing Accountable Care Organizations.

Eric Kessell1, Vishaal Pegany1, Beth Keolanui1, Brent D Fulton1, Richard M Scheffler1, Stephen M Shortell1.   

Abstract

Accountable care organizations (ACOs) have proliferated under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). If ACOs are to improve health care quality and lower costs, quality measures will be increasingly important in determining if provider consolidations associated with the development of ACOs are achieving their intended purpose. This article assesses quality measurement across public and private sectors. We reviewed available quality measures for a subset of programs in six organizations and assessed the number and domain of measures (structure, process, outcomes, and patient experience). Two-thirds of all quality measures were categorized as process measures. Outcome measures made up nearly 20 percent of measures. Patient experience and structure measures made up approximately 8 percent and 7 percent, respectively. We propose further improvements to quality measurement initiatives. For example, programs that reward providers should consider reward size and distribution within the organization. Quality improvement initiatives should consider what encourages provider buy-in and participation and the effects on populations with disproportionate health care needs. As the focus of quality initiatives may change from year to year, measures should be periodically revisited to ensure continued improvement and sustainability. Finally, we suggest quality measures that regulators could use prior to ACO formation or in the year or two following formation.
Copyright © 2015 by Duke University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicaid; Medicare; private sector; public sector; quality-of-care measures

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26124294     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-3150050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of Approaches for Aggregating Quality Measures in Population-based Payment Models.

Authors:  Alex McDowell; Christina A Nguyen; Michael E Chernew; Kevin N Tran; J Michael McWilliams; Bruce E Landon; Mary Beth Landrum
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  A Cross-Sectional Assessment of the Quality of Physician Quality Reporting System Measures.

Authors:  Brittney A Frankel; Tara F Bishop
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Removing Obstacles To Eliminating Racial And Ethnic Disparities In Behavioral Health Care.

Authors:  Margarita Alegría; Kiara Alvarez; Rachel Zack Ishikawa; Karissa DiMarzio; Samantha McPeck
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Randomized controlled trial of centralized vaccine reminder/recall to improve adult vaccination rates in an accountable care organization setting.

Authors:  Laura P Hurley; Brenda Beaty; Steven Lockhart; Dennis Gurfinkel; L Miriam Dickinson; Heather Roth; Allison Kempe
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2019-05-22

5.  Linking Process and Outcome Measures to Improve Employment Support Programs for Individuals With the Most Significant Disabilities.

Authors:  Tim Riesen; Corban Remund; Aubrey Snyder
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-05-11

6.  The Merit-based Incentive Payment System: Pearson's Chi-Square and Categorical Dependent Variable Models Analyzed for Domains-Effective Clinical Care and Efficiency/Cost Reduction.

Authors:  Amrita Shenoy
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-12-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.