Literature DB >> 24219953

Increasing demands for quality measurement.

Robert J Panzer1, Richard S Gitomer, William H Greene, Patricia Reagan Webster, Kevin R Landry, Charles A Riccobono.   

Abstract

Measurement of health care quality and patient safety is rapidly evolving, in response to long-term needs and more recent efforts to reform the US health system around "value." Development and choice of quality measures is now guided by a national quality strategy and priorities, with a public-private partnership, the National Quality Forum, helping determine the most worthwhile measures for evaluating and rewarding quality and safety of patient care. Yet there remain a number of challenges, including diverse purposes for quality measurement, limited availability of true clinical measures leading to frequent reliance on claims data with its flaws in determining quality, fragmentation of measurement systems with redundancy and conflicting conclusions, few high-quality comprehensive measurement systems and registries, and rapid expansion of required measures with hundreds of measures straining resources. The proliferation of quality measures at the clinician, hospital, and insurer level has created challenges and logistical problems. Recommendations include raising the bar for qualtiy measurements to achieve transformational rather than incremental change in the US quality measurement system, promoting a logical set of measures for the various levels of the health system, leaving room for internal organizational improvement, harmonizing the various national and local quality measurement systems, anchoring on National Quality Forum additions and subtractions of measures to be applied, reducing reliance on and retiring claims-based measures as quickly as possible, promoting comprehensive measurement such as through registries with deep understanding of patient risk factors and outcomes, reducing attention to proprietary report cards, prompt but careful transition to measures from electronic health records, and allocation of sufficient resources to accomplish the goals of an efficient, properly focused measurement system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24219953     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.282047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  46 in total

1.  Stroke Performance Measures Do Not Predict Functional Outcome.

Authors:  Eric E Adelman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Melinda A Smith; Jonggyu Baek; Erin C Case; Brisa N Sánchez; James F Burke; Lesli E Skolarus; Darin B Zahuranec; William J Meurer; Devin L Brown; Kevin A Kerber; Deborah A Levine; Nelda M Garcia; Morgan S Campbell; Lewis B Morgenstern
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2016-10-26

2.  Clinical Decision Support-based Quality Measurement (CDS-QM) Framework: Prototype Implementation, Evaluation, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Polina V Kukhareva; Kensaku Kawamoto; David E Shields; Darryl T Barfuss; Anne M Halley; Tyler J Tippetts; Phillip B Warner; Bruce E Bray; Catherine J Staes
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

3.  Performance Measurement and the Kidney Quality Improvement Registry.

Authors:  Michael J Fischer; Paul M Palevsky
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Public reporting and the evolution of diabetes quality.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McCullough; Daniel J Crespin; Jean M Abraham; Jon B Christianson; Michael Finch
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2015-03-06

Review 5.  Utilization of Prostate Cancer Quality Metrics for Research and Quality Improvement: A Structured Review.

Authors:  Davide Gori; Rajendra Dulal; Douglas W Blayney; James D Brooks; Maria P Fantini; Kathryn M McDonald; Tina Hernandez-Boussard
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2018-09-18

6.  Adequacy of the National Quality Forum's Colon Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy Quality Metric: Is 4 Months Soon Enough?

Authors:  Nader N Massarweh; Alex B Haynes; Yi-Ju Chiang; George J Chang; Y Nancy You; Barry W Feig; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Use of EHR-Based Pediatric Quality Measures: Views of Health System Leaders and Parents.

Authors:  David M Hartley; Susannah Jonas; Daniel Grossoehme; Amy Kelly; Cassandra Dodds; Shannon M Alford; Elizabeth Shenkman; Jeff Simmons; L Charles Bailey; Hanieh Razzaghi; Levon H Utidjian; Jennifer McCafferty-Fernandez; F Sessions Cole; Jordan Smallwood; Lloyd N Werk; Kathleen E Walsh
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  A Cross-Sectional Assessment of the Quality of Physician Quality Reporting System Measures.

Authors:  Brittney A Frankel; Tara F Bishop
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Quality Metrics in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kendra E Brett; Lindsay J Ritchie; Emily Ertel; Alexandria Bennett; Greg A Knoll
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  A new era of quality measurement in rheumatology: electronic clinical quality measures and national registries.

Authors:  Chris Tonner; Gabriela Schmajuk; Jinoos Yazdany
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.