Literature DB >> 17339678

General internists' views on pay-for-performance and public reporting of quality scores: a national survey.

Lawrence P Casalino1, G Caleb Alexander, Lei Jin, R Tamara Konetzka.   

Abstract

Very little is known about rank-and-file physicians' views on pay-for-performance (P4P) and public reporting. In a national survey of general internists, we found strong potential support for financial incentives for quality, but less support for public reporting. Large majorities of respondents stated that these programs will result in physicians' avoiding high-risk patients and will divert attention from important types of care for which quality is not measured. Public and private policymakers might avoid a physician backlash and better succeed at improving health care quality if they consider these concerns when designing P4P and public reporting programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17339678     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  33 in total

1.  Incentives for better performance in health care.

Authors:  Asaad Abduljawad; Assaf F Al-Assaf
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2011-05-15

2.  Health reforms as examples of multilevel interventions in cancer care.

Authors:  Ann B Flood; Mary L Fennell; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

3.  Pay for performance in primary care in England and California: comparison of unintended consequences.

Authors:  Ruth McDonald; Martin Roland
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Improving the performance of performance measurement.

Authors:  LeChauncy D Woodard; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The importance of rigorous evaluation of quality measurement programs.

Authors:  Michael W Sjoding; Colin R Cooke
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-01

6.  Exploring the Evidence Base Behind Quality Measures.

Authors:  Ezinne Eze-Ajoku; Melissa Lavoie; Matthew DeCamp
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Reasons for not intensifying medications: differentiating "clinical inertia" from appropriate care.

Authors:  Monika M Safford; Richard Shewchuk; Haiyan Qu; Jessica H Williams; Carlos A Estrada; Fernando Ovalle; Jeroan J Allison
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change.

Authors:  Maartje Lg de Vos; Sabine N van der Veer; Wilco C Graafmans; Nicolette F de Keizer; Kitty J Jager; Gert P Westert; Peter Hj van der Voort
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Improving benchmarking by using an explicit framework for the development of composite indicators: an example using pediatric quality of care.

Authors:  Jochen Profit; Katri V Typpo; Sylvia J Hysong; LeChauncy D Woodard; Michael A Kallen; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Reporting hospitals' antibiotic timing in pneumonia: adverse consequences for patients?

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Ateev Mehrotra; Jeffrey A Linder
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.