| Literature DB >> 27190635 |
Abstract
Purpose. To evaluate comparative aspiration flow performance and also vitrectomy operating time efficiency using a double-cutting open port vitreous cutting system incorporated in a two-dimensional cutting (TDC, DORC International) vitrectome design versus standard vitreous cutter. Methods. In vitro investigations compared aspiration flow rates in artificial vitreous humor at varying cutter speeds and vacuum levels using a TDC vitrectome and a standard vitrectome across different aspiration pump systems. A prospective single-centre clinical study evaluated duration of core vitrectomy in 80 patients with macular pucker undergoing 25-gauge or 27-gauge vitrectomy using either a TDC vitrectome at 16,000 cuts per minute (cpm) or standard single-cut vitrectome, combined with a Valve Timing intelligence (VTi) pump system (EVA, DORC International). Results. Aspiration flow rates remained constant independent of TDC vitrectome cut rate, while flow rates decreased linearly at higher cutter speeds using a classic single-blade vitrectome. Mean duration of core vitrectomy surgeries using a TDC vitreous cutter system was significantly (p < 0.001) shorter than the mean duration of core vitrectomy procedures using a single-cut vitrectome of the same diameter (reduction range, 34%-50%). Conclusion. Vitrectomy surgery performed using a TDC vitrectome was faster than core vitrectomy utilizing a standard single-action vitrectome at similar cut speeds.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27190635 PMCID: PMC4844880 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3849316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.909
Figure 1TDC vitrectome design and classic single-cut vitrectome.
Figure 2Aspiration flow rates of 25G TDC and standard vitrectomes @ 350–550 mmHg.
Figure 3Aspiration flow rates of 27G TDC and standard vitrectomes @ 350–550 mmHg.
Comparison of aspiration flow rates (mL/min) using TDC and standard single-cut vitrectomes connected to the EVA surgical system at varying cut rates and different vacuum pressures, in vitro tests performed using artificial vitreous humor as the aspirating fluid.
| Cut rate (cpm) | 0 | 2,000 | 4,000 | 5,000 | 6,000 | 7,000 | 8,000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25G TDC vitrectome flow rate (mL/min) | |||||||
| 350 mmHg | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| 550 mmHg | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max mmHg | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| 25G standard vitrectome flow rate (mL/min) | |||||||
| 350 mmHg | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| 550 mmHg | 3.1 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| Max mmHg | 3.9 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.3 |
| 27G TDC vitrectome flow rate (mL/min) | |||||||
| 350 mmHg | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| 550 mmHg | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Max mmHg | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| 27G standard vitrectome flow rate (mL/min) | |||||||
| 350 mmHg | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| 550 mmHg | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Max mmHg | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 |
TDC: two-dimensional cutting; cpm: cuts per minute; mmHg: millimeters of mercury.
Mean duration of core vitrectomy operating time for 27-gauge and 25-gauge surgeries utilizing either a standard single-cut or a TDC vitrectome.
| Parameter | 25-gauge vitrectomy | 27-gauge vitrectomy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard vitrectome ( | TDC vitrectome ( | Standard vitrectome ( | TDC vitrectome ( | |
| Mean core vitrectomy duration (SD), in seconds | 148.19 (25.14) | 73.80 (18.61) | 242.71 (25.52) | 159.71 (29.47) |
|
|
|
| ||
Mean duration of core vitrectomy operating time for 27-gauge and 25-gauge surgeries utilizing either a standard single-cut or a TDC vitrectome is shown above, demonstrating significantly shorter case duration for TDC vitrectomy surgery groups (n = 80, 20 eyes assigned, resp., to each surgery group).