| Literature DB >> 32606569 |
Omar A Saleh1, Saif A Alshamarti2, Nakhleh E Abu-Yaghi3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare characteristics, clinical outcomes and complication profiles of a cohort of patients undergoing 27-gauge versus 23-gauge vitrectomy surgery at a tertiary medical center in the Middle East.Entities:
Keywords: hypotony; micro-incisional eye surgery; pars plana vitrectomy; sclerotomy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32606569 PMCID: PMC7293406 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S255162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
Demographic Characteristics and Indications for Surgery in Patients Who Had 23-Gauge and 27-Gauge Vitrectomy
| 27-Gauge Group | 23-Gauge Group | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 22 | 44 | |
| Age in years | 59.2 ± 13.7 | 58.7 ± 13.5 | 0.879 |
| Gender | 12 female, 10 male | 20 female, 24 male | 0.603 |
| Follow-up in months | 14.9 ± 2.1 | 17.8 ± 5.1 | 0.011 |
| Lens status (% pseudophakia) | 82% | 84% | 1.0 |
| Indication for vitrectomy | |||
| -ERM | 11 (50%) | 23 (52%) | 1.0 |
| -MH | 4 (18%) | 8 (18%) | 1.0 |
| -VHa | 4 (18%) | 7 (16%) | 1.0 |
| -VMT | 2 (9%) | 5 (11%) | 1.0 |
| -Vitreous opacityb | 1 (5%) | 1 (3%) | 1.0 |
Notes: aVitreous hemorrhage was due to proliferative diabetic retinopathy in 3 cases in the 27-gauge group and 5 cases in the 23-gauge group, due to Terson’s syndrome in one case in each group, and due to 1 case of not previously diagnosed branch retinal vein occlusion in the 23-gauge group. bThe patient with this condition in the 27-gauge group had visually significant asteroid hyalosis and the patient in the 23-gauge group had vitreous opacities due to inactive intermediate uveitis.
Abbreviations: ERM, epiretinal membrane; MH, macular hole; VH, vitreous hemorrhage; VMT, vitreomacular traction.
Intraocular Pressure Changes Before and After 27-Gauge and 23-Gauge Vitrectomy
| Baseline | Postop Day 1 | Postop Week 1 | Final Visit | p valuea | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27-gauge | 14.1 ± 3.2 | 13.1 ± 2.7 | 14.5 ± 2.5 | 14.7 ± 2.8 | 0.075, 0.077, 0.082 |
| 23-gauge | 14 ± 3 | 12 ± 5.6 | 13.9 ± 3.1 | 14.9 ± 2.4 | 0.035, 0.048, 0.109 |
| p valueb | 0.910 | 0.390 | 0.459 | 0.757 |
Notes: aThe three p values calculated by Student’s t-test are for comparisons of: mean IOP at baseline to that at first postoperative day, mean IOP at the first postoperative day to that at 1 week postoperatively, and mean IOP at 1 week postoperatively to that at the final visit, respectively. bp value calculated by Student’s t-test for comparing the mean IOP values in the 27-gauge to those in the 23-gauge groups at different time points.
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in LogMAR Units at Different Time Points in Patients Who Had 27-Gauge and 23-Gauge Vitrectomy
| Baseline | 1-Month Visit | Final Visit | p valuea | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27-gauge | 0.65 ± 0.47 | 0.33 ± 0.21 | 0.37 ± 0.22 | 0.005, 0.465 |
| 23-gauge | 0.68 ± 0.37 | 0.39 ± 0.27 | 0.42 ± 0.25 | 0.001, 0.621 |
| p valueb | 0.824 | 0.346 | 0.509 |
Notes: aThe two p values calculated by Student’s t-test are for comparisons of mean BCVA at baseline to that at 1 month postoperatively and mean BCVA at 1 month postoperatively to that at final visit, respectively. bp values calculated by Student’s t-test comparing the mean BCVA values in the 27-gauge to those in the 23-gauge groups at different time points.