PURPOSE: To determine the influence of port geometry on water and vitreous flow rates and test novel vitreous cutter tips in specific surgical situations. METHODS: Custom 20-gauge and 25-gauge vitreous cutter tips with different sized ports were evaluated through porcine vitreous and water flow rates. Five cutter tips were designed and fabricated for specific surgical functionalities. Tips were compared with a normal control tip and evaluated by water and porcine vitreous flow rates, vacuum level required to cut porcine retina, time required to cut and aspirate a porcine lens, and surgical evaluation in enucleated porcine eyes. RESULTS: Both vitreous and water flow asymptotically approached a maximum flow as the port diameter increased. Some tips removed water faster than the normal control tip, but none removed vitreous or lens faster. Several tips required higher vacuum levels to cut retina than the normal tip. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the port diameter of a vitreous cutter to increase flow becomes less effective as the port becomes larger. Furthermore, modifying the port geometry of a vitreous cutter affects its surgical interactions with tissue. In the future, combinational instruments or surgery specific instruments may allow the surgeon to use an optimal port for a specific surgical task.
PURPOSE: To determine the influence of port geometry on water and vitreous flow rates and test novel vitreous cutter tips in specific surgical situations. METHODS: Custom 20-gauge and 25-gauge vitreous cutter tips with different sized ports were evaluated through porcine vitreous and water flow rates. Five cutter tips were designed and fabricated for specific surgical functionalities. Tips were compared with a normal control tip and evaluated by water and porcine vitreous flow rates, vacuum level required to cut porcine retina, time required to cut and aspirate a porcine lens, and surgical evaluation in enucleated porcine eyes. RESULTS: Both vitreous and water flow asymptotically approached a maximum flow as the port diameter increased. Some tips removed water faster than the normal control tip, but none removed vitreous or lens faster. Several tips required higher vacuum levels to cut retina than the normal tip. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the port diameter of a vitreous cutter to increase flow becomes less effective as the port becomes larger. Furthermore, modifying the port geometry of a vitreous cutter affects its surgical interactions with tissue. In the future, combinational instruments or surgery specific instruments may allow the surgeon to use an optimal port for a specific surgical task.
Authors: Bruno Diniz; Rodrigo B Fernandes; Ramiro M Ribeiro; Jaw-Chyng Lue; Anderson G Teixeira; Octaviano Magalhães; Mauricio Maia; Mark S Humayun Journal: Retina Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Paulo Eduardo Stanga; Salvador Pastor-Idoate; Isaac Zambrano; Paul Carlin; David McLeod Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 3.240