Literature DB >> 27189157

Steerable versus non-steerable sheaths during pulmonary vein isolation: impact of left atrial enlargement on the catheter-tissue contact force.

Masaharu Masuda1, Masashi Fujita2, Osamu Iida2, Shin Okamoto2, Takayuki Ishihara2, Kiyonori Nanto2, Takashi Kanda2, Tatsuya Shiraki2, Akihiro Sunaga2, Yasuhiro Matsuda2, Masaaki Uematsu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The influence of left atrial (LA) enlargement on the efficacy of steerable sheath usage during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is poorly understood. Here, we compared the catheter-tissue contact force (CF) and clinical outcomes between steerable and non-steerable sheaths among patients with different severities of LA enlargement.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 90 consecutive atrial fibrillation patients scheduled for PV isolation (paroxysmal, 67 %) were enrolled and divided into tertiles of the LA volume (LA1, <124 cm3; LA2, 124 to 145 cm3; LA3, ≥146 cm3). An ipsilateral PV isolation was completed using either a steerable (n = 57) or non-steerable sheath (n = 33).
RESULTS: The average CF of each ipsilateral PV was lower in the LA3 group (right 13.8 ± 5.8 g; left 9.7 ± 5.2 g) than LA1 (right 15.6 ± 6.8 g, p = 0.005; left 12.5 ± 5.6 g, p < 0.0001) or LA2 (right 15.2 ± 7.3 g, p = 0.04; left 12.6 ± 5.3 g, p < 0.0001) groups. In total, the average CF around the left PVs was significantly higher with steerable sheaths than without (12.7 ± 5.5 vs. 10.2 ± 4.9 g, p = 0.03). Subgroup analysis revealed that a tendency toward higher CF around the left PVs was observed in the LA3 group (12.3 ± 7.3 vs. 8.5 ± 3.9 g, p = 0.08) but was not in the LA1 and LA2 groups. Further, in the LA3 group, steerable sheath usage showed better clinical outcomes: shorter procedural (55 ± 29 min vs. 81 ± 39 min, p = 0.04) and fluoroscopic times (27 ± 11 min vs. 37 ± 17 min, p = 0.045) and a tendency toward a lower 1-year AF recurrence rate (39 vs. 12 %, p = 0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effects of using steerable sheaths were more prominent in patients with severe LA enlargement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Contact force; Left atrial size; Pulmonary vein isolation; Steerable sheath

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27189157     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-016-0135-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  15 in total

1.  Pulmonary vein isolation using "contact force" ablation: the effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation--a prospective study.

Authors:  Jason G Andrade; George Monir; Scott J Pollak; Paul Khairy; Marc Dubuc; Denis Roy; Mario Talajic; Marc Deyell; Léna Rivard; Bernard Thibault; Peter G Guerra; Stanley Nattel; Laurent Macle
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Regional difference of optimal contact force to prevent acute pulmonary vein reconnection during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yohei Sotomi; Takayuki Kikkawa; Koichi Inoue; Koji Tanaka; Yuko Toyoshima; Takafumi Oka; Nobuaki Tanaka; Yoichi Nozato; Yoshiyuki Orihara; Katsuomi Iwakura; Yasushi Sakata; Kenshi Fujii
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-05-30

3.  Operator-blinded contact force monitoring during pulmonary vein isolation using conventional and steerable sheaths.

Authors:  Takehiro Kimura; Seiji Takatsuki; Ako Oishi; Masachika Negishi; Shin Kashimura; Yoshinori Katsumata; Takahiko Nishiyama; Nobuhiro Nishiyama; Yoko Tanimoto; Yoshiyasu Aizawa; Keiichi Fukuda
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  In vivo contact force measurements and correlation with left atrial anatomy during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Fabienne Schluermann; Tobias Krauss; Juergen Biermann; Maximilian Hartmann; Luca Trolese; Gregor Pache; Christoph Bode; Stefan Asbach
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Prospective characterization of catheter-tissue contact force at different anatomic sites during antral pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Saurabh Kumar; Joseph B Morton; Justin Lee; Karen Halloran; Steven J Spence; Alexandra Gorelik; Graham Hepworth; Peter M Kistler; Jonathan M Kalman
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-10-19

6.  Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study.

Authors:  Petr Neuzil; Vivek Y Reddy; Josef Kautzner; Jan Petru; Dan Wichterle; Dipen Shah; Hendrik Lambert; Aude Yulzari; Erik Wissner; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-03-20

7.  The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study.

Authors:  Vivek Y Reddy; Dipen Shah; Josef Kautzner; Boris Schmidt; Nadir Saoudi; Claudia Herrera; Pierre Jaïs; Gerhard Hindricks; Petr Peichl; Aude Yulzari; Hendrik Lambert; Petr Neuzil; Andrea Natale; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  A randomized trial to compare atrial fibrillation ablation using a steerable vs. a non-steerable sheath.

Authors:  Kim Rajappan; Victoria Baker; Laura Richmond; Peter M Kistler; Glyn Thomas; Calum Redpath; Simon C Sporton; Mark J Earley; Stuart Harris; Richard J Schilling
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Left atrial volume calculated by multi-detector computed tomography may predict successful pulmonary vein isolation in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  João Abecasis; Raquel Dourado; António Ferreira; Carla Saraiva; Diogo Cavaco; Katya Reis Santos; Francisco Belo Morgado; Pedro Adragão; Aniceto Silva
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Josef Kautzner; Petr Neuzil; Hendrik Lambert; Petr Peichl; Jan Petru; Robert Cihak; Jan Skoda; Dan Wichterle; Erik Wissner; Aude Yulzari; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.214

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview for Clinicians.

Authors:  Nebojša Mujović; Milan Marinković; Radoslaw Lenarczyk; Roland Tilz; Tatjana S Potpara
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Utilization of steerable sheath improves the efficiency of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by robotic magnetic navigation compared with fixed-curve sheath.

Authors:  Qingzhi Luo; Yun Xie; Yangyang Bao; Yue Wei; Changjian Lin; Ning Zhang; Tianyou Ling; Kang Chen; Wenqi Pan; Liqun Wu; Qi Jin
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.287

3.  Steerable versus nonsteerable sheath technology in atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Mhanna; Azizullah Beran; Ahmad Al-Abdouh; Omar Sajdeya; Mahmoud Barbarawi; Mahmoud Alsaiqali; Ahmad Jabri; Ahmad Al-Aaraj; Abdulmajeed Alharbi; Paul Chacko
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Contact-Force Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation does not Improve Success Rate in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients and Severe Left Atrial Enlargement: A 12-month Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Enes E Gul; Usama Boles; Sohaib Haseeb; Wilma Hopman; Kevin A Michael; Chris Simpson; Hoshiar Abdollah; Adrian Baranchuk; Damian Redfearn; Benedict Glover
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-08-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.