Literature DB >> 24762005

Regional difference of optimal contact force to prevent acute pulmonary vein reconnection during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Yohei Sotomi1, Takayuki Kikkawa2, Koichi Inoue1, Koji Tanaka1, Yuko Toyoshima1, Takafumi Oka1, Nobuaki Tanaka1, Yoichi Nozato1, Yoshiyuki Orihara1, Katsuomi Iwakura1, Yasushi Sakata3, Kenshi Fujii1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regional differences in optimal contact force (CF) to prevent acute pulmonary vein reconnection (APVR) during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate regional difference in optimal CF during AF ablation.
METHODS: This single-center observational study evaluated data from 57 consecutive drug-refractory AF patients (mean age, 62 ± 11 years; 43 males) who underwent initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the THERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH™ (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) catheter from June to August 2013. APVR was defined as the time-dependent reconnection >20 minutes after initial PVI and/or reconnection evoked by intravenous adenosine administration (20 mg). Point-by-point relationships between the reconnected points and their CF values were evaluated.
RESULTS: Total 72 gaps causing APVR were observed. Of a total of 4,421 ablation points, 285 (6.4%) were associated with APVR. The average CF value of the points with APVR was significantly lower than that of those without (APVR vs. no APVR; 7.5 ± 6.7 g vs. 9.9 ± 8.4 g; P < 0.0001). The areas under the curve and optimal CF values differed between segments (range 0.593-0.761 and 10-22 g, respectively). The optimal CF value was highest in bottom of the right PV and posterosuperior right PV segments (22 g) and lowest in posteroinferior right PV segment (10 g).
CONCLUSIONS: There was a regional difference in optimal CF values to prevent APVR, and the optimal CF value to prevent APVR with >95% probability was 10-22 g, depending on the individual peri-PV segments.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute pulmonary vein reconnection; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; contact force; pulmonary vein isolation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24762005     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  9 in total

1.  Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kohki Nakamura; Shigeto Naito; Takehito Sasaki; Masahiro Nakano; Kentaro Minami; Yosuke Nakatani; Kentaro Ikeda; Eiji Yamashita; Koji Kumagai; Nobusada Funabashi; Shigeru Oshima
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Steerable versus non-steerable sheaths during pulmonary vein isolation: impact of left atrial enlargement on the catheter-tissue contact force.

Authors:  Masaharu Masuda; Masashi Fujita; Osamu Iida; Shin Okamoto; Takayuki Ishihara; Kiyonori Nanto; Takashi Kanda; Tatsuya Shiraki; Akihiro Sunaga; Yasuhiro Matsuda; Masaaki Uematsu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Wall thickness of the pulmonary vein-left atrial junction rather than electrical information as the major determinant of dormant conduction after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Kazuki Iso; Yasuo Okumura; Ichiro Watanabe; Koichi Nagashima; Kazumasa Sonoda; Rikitake Kogawa; Naoko Sasaki; Keiko Takahashi; Sayaka Kurokawa; Toshiko Nakai; Kimie Ohkubo; Atsushi Hirayama
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Should Adenosine Test be Performed Systematically at the End of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedure?

Authors:  Fernando M ContrerasValdes; Elad Anter
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-12-31

Review 5.  Better Lesion Creation And Assessment During Catheter Ablation.

Authors:  Saurabh Kumar; Chirag R Barbhaiya; Samuel Balindger; Roy M John; Laurence M Epstein; Bruce A Koplan; Usha B Tedrow; William G Stevenson; Gregory F Michaud
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-10-31

6.  Contact Force-Guided Ablation Reduced Poor Contact Segments and Improved Acute Reconnection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Lee So-Ryoung; Park Hyoung-Seob; Choi Eue-Keun; Kwon Soonil; Cho Youngjin; Oh Il-Young; Oh Seil; Han Seongwook
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2020-02-28

7.  EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Josef Kautzner; Petr Neuzil; Hendrik Lambert; Petr Peichl; Jan Petru; Robert Cihak; Jan Skoda; Dan Wichterle; Erik Wissner; Aude Yulzari; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 8.  Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: Achieving permanent pulmonary vein isolation by point-by-point radiofrequency lesions.

Authors:  Alonso Pedrote; Juan Acosta; Beatriz Jáuregui-Garrido; Manuel Frutos-López; Eduardo Arana-Rueda
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-26

9.  Reduced residual conduction gaps and favourable outcome in contact force-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Taihei Itoh; Masaomi Kimura; Hirofumi Tomita; Shingo Sasaki; Shingen Owada; Daisuke Horiuchi; Kenichi Sasaki; Yuji Ishida; Takahiko Kinjo; Ken Okumura
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.214

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.