Literature DB >> 27188275

Current concepts of Harm-Benefit Analysis of Animal Experiments - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 1.

Aurora Brønstad1, Christian E Newcomer2, Thierry Decelle3, Jeffrey I Everitt4, Javier Guillen5, Kathy Laber6.   

Abstract

International regulations and guidelines strongly suggest that the use of animal models in scientific research should be initiated only after the authority responsible for the review of animal studies has concluded a well-thought-out harm-benefit analysis (HBA) and deemed the project to be appropriate. Although the process for conducting HBAs may not be new, the relevant factors and algorithms used in conducting them during the review process are deemed to be poorly defined or lacking by committees in many institutions. This paper presents the current concept of HBAs based on a literature review. References on cost or risk benefit from clinical trials and other industries are also included. Several approaches to HBA have been discovered including algorithms, graphic presentations and generic processes. The aim of this study is to better aid and harmonize understanding of the concepts of 'harm', 'benefit' and 'harm-benefit analysis'.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal experiment; ethical review; harm–benefit

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27188275      PMCID: PMC5815836          DOI: 10.1177/0023677216642398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  25 in total

1.  The ethical acceptability of animal experiments: a proposal for a system to support decision-making.

Authors:  F R Stafleu; R Tramper; J Vorstenbosch; J A Joles
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  Ethical scores for animal experiments.

Authors:  D G Porter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Human Experimentation: Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1964-09-12       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Guidance on determining indispensability and balancing potential benefits of animal experiments with costs to the animals with specific consideration of EU directive 2010/63/EU.

Authors:  Toni Lindl; Ulrike Gross; Irmela Ruhdel; Sonja von Aulock; Manfred Völkel
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 6.043

5.  Canine tumor cross-species genomics uncovers targets linked to osteosarcoma progression.

Authors:  Melissa Paoloni; Sean Davis; Susan Lana; Stephen Withrow; Luca Sangiorgi; Piero Picci; Stephen Hewitt; Timothy Triche; Paul Meltzer; Chand Khanna
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Turning apples into oranges? The harm-benefit analysis and how to take ethical considerations into account.

Authors:  Herwig Grimm
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.303

7.  Practical difficulties in balancing harms and benefits in the modern use of laboratory animals: biotechnology.

Authors:  Tjard de Cock Buning
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.303

8.  The use of animals for research on animal diseases: its impact on the harm-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Michael D Rickard
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.303

9.  Painful dilemmas: A study of the way the public's assessment of animal research balances costs to animals against human benefits.

Authors:  Thomas Bøker Lund; Morten Raun Mørkbak; Jesper Lassen; Peter Sandøe
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2012-08-03

Review 10.  A first step to assess harm and benefit in clinical trials in one scale.

Authors:  Maarten Boers; Peter Brooks; James F Fries; Lee S Simon; Vibeke Strand; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  22 in total

1.  Preclinical Western Blot in the Era of Digital Transformation and Reproducible Research, an Eastern Perspective.

Authors:  Saman Sargolzaei; Ajeet Kaushik; Seyed Soltani; M Hadi Amini; Mohammad Reza Khalghani; Navid Khoshavi; Arman Sargolzaei
Journal:  Interdiscip Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.233

2.  More than 3Rs: the importance of scientific validity for harm-benefit analysis of animal research.

Authors:  Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 3.  Considerations for Infectious Disease Research Studies Using Animals.

Authors:  Lesley A Colby; Lauriane E Quenee; Lois A Zitzow
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 0.982

4.  The Role of IACUCs in Responsible Animal Research.

Authors:  S Mohan; R Huneke
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2019-12-31

5.  Ethical and IACUC Considerations Regarding Analgesia and Pain Management in Laboratory Rodents.

Authors:  Larry Carbone
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 6.  Benefit-risk assessment and reporting in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Bethea A Kleykamp; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Zubin Bhagwagar; Penney Cowan; Christopher Eccleston; Susan S Ellenberg; Scott R Evans; John T Farrar; Roy L Freeman; Louis P Garrison; Jennifer S Gewandter; Veeraindar Goli; Smriti Iyengar; Alejandro R Jadad; Mark P Jensen; Roderick Junor; Nathaniel P Katz; J Patrick Kesslak; Ernest A Kopecky; Dmitri Lissin; John D Markman; Michael P McDermott; Philip J Mease; Alec B O'Connor; Kushang V Patel; Srinivasa N Raja; Michael C Rowbotham; Cristina Sampaio; Jasvinder A Singh; Ilona Steigerwald; Vibeke Strand; Leslie A Tive; Jeffrey Tobias; Ajay D Wasan; Hilary D Wilson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 7.926

7.  A Structured Approach to Optimizing Animal Model Selection for Human Translation: The Animal Model Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Joanne Storey; Thomas Gobbetti; Alan Olzinski; Brian R Berridge
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 1.521

Review 8.  Bioethical, Reproducibility, and Translational Challenges of Animal Models.

Authors:  Margaret Landi; Jeffrey Everitt; B Berridge
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 1.521

9.  Internal consistency and compatibility of the 3Rs and 3Vs principles for project evaluation of animal research.

Authors:  Matthias Eggel; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  The Symbiotic Relationship Between Scientific Quality and Animal Research Ethics.

Authors:  Samuel A Brill; Selena M Guerrero-Martin; Kelly A Metcalf Pate
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 1.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.