Literature DB >> 31455464

Ethical and IACUC Considerations Regarding Analgesia and Pain Management in Laboratory Rodents.

Larry Carbone1.   

Abstract

Scientists have ethical and regulatory commitments to minimize pain and distress during their use of sentient laboratory animals. Here I discuss pain as a special form of distress and the long history of ethical and regulatory standards calling on scientists to prevent, minimize, treat or terminate animal pain. Scientists, veterinarians, and IACUC face 2 challenges: knowledge of effective analgesic doses and regimens for all sexes, ages and genotypes of rodent is incomplete, and concerns regarding the effects of analgesic drugs on research outcomes push scientists to request approval to withhold analgesics and leave animal pain unalleviated. IACUC thus conduct what I call an 'ethics of uncertainty,' in which they factor in the limits of available ethically relevant information on the amount of expected animal suffering, the usefulness of analgesics to mitigate this suffering, and the eventual benefits that come from the research. IACUC must factor in current limitations in severity assessments of various experimental manipulations in various strains, inaccurate pain diagnosis, in known effective analgesic and other refinements, and on effects of pain medications and untreated pain on data outcomes, when deciding to allow potentially painful experiments and animal care practices. This article focuses on 3 areas of concern: the limits of veterinary "professional judgment" when the animal model's degree of pain and the efficacy of pain medications are not yet known; the review of proposals with known, unalleviated significant pain and distress (that is, Category E experiments); and the attempt to review the balance between animal welfare harms and scientific objectives. I propose no new regulations, standards, or ethical norms herein but rather explore some of the implications when existing ethical principles are applied to evolving scientific knowledge (and vice versa). I conclude that applying current animal pain management knowledge to prevailing ethical principles will shift IACUC toward greater caution in allowing potentially painful animal experiments, with heightened caution regarding the ability of analgesics to mitigate the animals' pain.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31455464      PMCID: PMC6935703          DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-18-000149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Med        ISSN: 1532-0820            Impact factor:   0.982


  30 in total

1.  Laboratory animal welfare; U.S. government principles for the utilization and care of vertebrate animals used in testing, research and training; notice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1985-05-20

2.  A study of three IACUCs and their views of scientific merit and alternatives.

Authors:  Karen Graham
Journal:  J Appl Anim Welf Sci       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.440

3.  Report of the Working Group on Animal Distress in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Marilyn Brown; Larry Carbone; Kathleen M Conlee; Marian S Dawkins; Ian J Duncan; David Fraser; Gilly Griffin; Victoria A Hampshire; Lesley A Lambert; Joy A Mench; David Morton; Jon Richmond; Bernard E Rollin; Andrew N Rowan; Martin L Stephens; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 4.  Alternatives to continuous social housing.

Authors:  K Bayne
Journal:  Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1991-08

5.  Reported analgesic and anaesthetic administration to non-human primates undergoing experimental surgical procedure: 2010-2015.

Authors:  Henri Georges Michel Justin Bertrand; Charlotte Sandersen; Paul Andrew Flecknell
Journal:  J Med Primatol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 0.667

Review 6.  To Treat or Not to Treat: The Effects of Pain on Experimental Parameters.

Authors:  Norman C Peterson; Elizabeth A Nunamaker; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 0.982

7.  Pain and Laboratory Animals: Publication Practices for Better Data Reproducibility and Better Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Larry Carbone; Jamie Austin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of housing density in five inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Judith L Morgan; Karen L Svenson; Jeffrey P Lake; Weidong Zhang; Timothy M Stearns; Michael A Marion; Luanne L Peters; Beverly Paigen; Leah Rae Donahue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of stress, fear and anxiety on the nociceptive responses of larval zebrafish.

Authors:  Javier Lopez-Luna; Qussay Al-Jubouri; Waleed Al-Nuaimy; Lynne U Sneddon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Availability of feces-free areas in rodent shoebox cages.

Authors:  Gregory P Boivin
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 12.625

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of Sustained-release and Extended-release Buprenorphine in Mice after Surgical Catheterization.

Authors:  Marissa Saenz; Elizabeth A Bloom-Saldana; Tim Synold; Richard W Ermel; Patrick T Fueger; James B Finlay
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 1.706

Review 2.  Mouse Models of Osteoarthritis: A Summary of Models and Outcomes Assessment.

Authors:  Sabine Drevet; Bertrand Favier; Emmanuel Brun; Gaëtan Gavazzi; Bernard Lardy
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 1.565

Review 3.  Reducing Pain in Experimental Models of Intestinal Inflammation Affects the Immune Response.

Authors:  Laura Golusda; Anja A Kühl; Britta Siegmund; Daniela Paclik
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 7.290

4.  Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species.

Authors:  Larry Carbone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Analysis of Animal Well-Being When Supplementing Drinking Water with Tramadol or Metamizole during Chronic Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Guanglin Tang; Wiebke-Felicitas Nierath; Rupert Palme; Brigitte Vollmar; Dietmar Zechner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Open Transparent Communication about Animals in Laboratories: Dialog for Multiple Voices and Multiple Audiences.

Authors:  Larry Carbone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.