Literature DB >> 1545854

Ethical scores for animal experiments.

D G Porter1.   

Abstract

Scientists have for too long been faced with a polarized debate concerning the ethics of animal experiments. An ethical ideal and a practical scoring system would be valuable for the moderate majority.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1545854     DOI： 10.1038/356101a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  13 in total

1.  Reporting ethical matters in the Journal of Physiology: standards and advice.

Authors:  Gordon B Drummond
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Decision Making and the IACUC: Part 1- Protocol Information Discussed at Full-Committee Reviews.

Authors:  Jerald Silverman; Charles W Lidz; Jonathan C Clayfield; Alexandra Murray; Lorna J Simon; Richard G Rondeau
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 3.  Current concepts of Harm-Benefit Analysis of Animal Experiments - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 1.

Authors:  Aurora Brønstad; Christian E Newcomer; Thierry Decelle; Jeffrey I Everitt; Javier Guillen; Kathy Laber
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Experimental infectious respiratory disease in groups of calves: lobar distribution, variance, and sample-size requirements for vaccine evaluation.

Authors:  K W F Jericho; G C Kozub
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  An ex vivo physiologic and hyperplastic vessel culture model to study intra-arterial stent therapies.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Mehmet H Kural; Jonathan Wu; Katherine L Leiby; Vinayak Mishra; Taras Lysyy; Guangxin Li; Jiesi Luo; Allison Greaney; George Tellides; Yibing Qyang; Nan Huang; Laura E Niklason
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 15.304

6.  Retrospective harm benefit analysis of pre-clinical animal research for six treatment interventions.

Authors:  Pandora Pound; Christine J Nicol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Necessary, but Not Sufficient. The Benefit Concept in the Project Evaluation of Animal Research in the Context of Directive 2010/63/EU.

Authors:  Matthias Eggel; Herwig Grimm
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals.

Authors:  Katrien Devolder; Matthias Eggel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Internal consistency and compatibility of the 3Rs and 3Vs principles for project evaluation of animal research.

Authors:  Matthias Eggel; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  The Road to Hell Is Paved with Good Intentions: Why Harm-Benefit Analysis and Its Emphasis on Practical Benefit Jeopardizes the Credibility of Research.

Authors:  Herwig Grimm; Matthias Eggel; Anna Deplazes-Zemp; Nikola Biller-Andorno
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.752
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.