Literature DB >> 10780850

The ethical acceptability of animal experiments: a proposal for a system to support decision-making.

F R Stafleu1, R Tramper, J Vorstenbosch, J A Joles.   

Abstract

We describe a system to support decision-making on the ethical acceptability of animal experiments for scientific researchers and others responsible for ethical decision-making in animal experiments. The system consists of eight steps. Each step contains a number of substantive questions or a computational rule, leading to a well-articulated moral judgment on specific animal experiments. The system comprises a number of moral assumptions and pre-emptive norms, but leaves enough room for moral discretion and personal responsibility. The general ethical ideas behind the moral choices and assumptions are sketched and potential objections to the overall approach are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10780850     DOI: 10.1258/002367799780578255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  12 in total

1.  On balance: weighing harms and benefits in fundamental neurological research using nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Gardar Arnason; Jens Clausen
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-06

2.  The Three Rs of Animal Research: What they Mean for the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Why.

Authors:  Howard J Curzer; Gad Perry; Mark C Wallace; Dan Perry
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Decision Making and the IACUC: Part 1- Protocol Information Discussed at Full-Committee Reviews.

Authors:  Jerald Silverman; Charles W Lidz; Jonathan C Clayfield; Alexandra Murray; Lorna J Simon; Richard G Rondeau
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 4.  Current concepts of Harm-Benefit Analysis of Animal Experiments - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 1.

Authors:  Aurora Brønstad; Christian E Newcomer; Thierry Decelle; Jeffrey I Everitt; Javier Guillen; Kathy Laber
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Retrospective harm benefit analysis of pre-clinical animal research for six treatment interventions.

Authors:  Pandora Pound; Christine J Nicol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Necessary, but Not Sufficient. The Benefit Concept in the Project Evaluation of Animal Research in the Context of Directive 2010/63/EU.

Authors:  Matthias Eggel; Herwig Grimm
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals.

Authors:  Katrien Devolder; Matthias Eggel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  The Symbiotic Relationship Between Scientific Quality and Animal Research Ethics.

Authors:  Samuel A Brill; Selena M Guerrero-Martin; Kelly A Metcalf Pate
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 1.521

9.  Evaluation of animal models of neurobehavioral disorders.

Authors:  F Josef van der Staay; Saskia S Arndt; Rebecca E Nordquist
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  The Road to Hell Is Paved with Good Intentions: Why Harm-Benefit Analysis and Its Emphasis on Practical Benefit Jeopardizes the Credibility of Research.

Authors:  Herwig Grimm; Matthias Eggel; Anna Deplazes-Zemp; Nikola Biller-Andorno
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.