Literature DB >> 22562491

Guidance on determining indispensability and balancing potential benefits of animal experiments with costs to the animals with specific consideration of EU directive 2010/63/EU.

Toni Lindl1, Ulrike Gross, Irmela Ruhdel, Sonja von Aulock, Manfred Völkel.   

Abstract

Within the context of a workshop, a concept and practical guidance were developed that seek to balance potential benefits of animal experiments to humans, other animals, and the environment against the pain, suffering, and distress caused to the experimental animals. The aim was to achieve transparent decisions that can be communicated in a concise manner that is accessible to a layperson and is in accordance with German national law and EU Directive 2010/63/EU. The steps of the resulting decision process deal with the classification of procedures into the four severity levels, the consideration of humane endpoints, determination of the indispensability of the procedure on the basis of sound scientific argument, classification into applied or basic research, determination of the probability of success in the case of applied research, and the cost-benefit analysis, culminating in a decision on the approval or denial of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22562491     DOI: 10.14573/altex.2012.2.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ALTEX        ISSN: 1868-596X            Impact factor:   6.043


  3 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts of Harm-Benefit Analysis of Animal Experiments - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 1.

Authors:  Aurora Brønstad; Christian E Newcomer; Thierry Decelle; Jeffrey I Everitt; Javier Guillen; Kathy Laber
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  Effect of prehypertensive losartan therapy on AT1R and ATRAP methylation of adipose tissue in the later life of high‑fat‑fed spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Authors:  Tingjun Wang; Guili Lian; Xiaoqi Cai; Zhihong Lin; Liangdi Xie
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.952

3.  Reviewing the Review: A Pilot Study of the Ethical Review Process of Animal Research in Sweden.

Authors:  Svea Jörgensen; Johan Lindsjö; Elin M Weber; Helena Röcklinsberg
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.