Sam R Sharar1, Ava Alamdari1, Christine Hoffer1, Hunter G Hoffman2, Mark P Jensen3, David R Patterson3. 1. 1 Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, Washington. 2. 2 Human Photonics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington. 3. 3 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Immersive virtual reality (VR) distraction provides clinically effective pain relief and increases subjective reports of "fun" in medical settings of procedural pain. The goal of this study was to better describe the variable of "fun" associated with VR distraction analgesia using the circumplex model (pleasure/arousal) of affect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-four healthy volunteers (mean age, 29 years; 37 females) received a standardized, 18-minute, multimodal pain sequence (alternating thermal heat and electrical stimulation to distal extremities) while receiving immersive, interactive VR distraction. Subjects rated both their subjective pain intensity and fun using 0-10 Graphic Rating Scales, as well as the pleasantness of their emotional valence and their state of arousal on 9-point scales. RESULTS: Compared with pain stimulation in the control (baseline, no VR) condition, immersive VR distraction significantly reduced subjective pain intensity (P < 0.001). During VR distraction, compared with those reporting negative affect, subjects reporting positive affect did so more frequently (41 percent versus 9 percent), as well as reporting both greater pain reduction (22 percent versus 1 percent) and fun scores (7.0 ± 1.9 versus 2.4 ± 1.4). Several factors-lower anxiety, greater fun, greater presence in the VR environment, and positive emotional valence-were associated with subjective analgesia during VR distraction. CONCLUSIONS: Immersive VR distraction reduces subjective pain intensity induced by multimodal experimental nociception. Subjects who report less anxiety, more fun, more VR presence, and more positive emotional valence during VR distraction are more likely to report subjective pain reduction. These findings indicate VR distraction analgesia may be mediated through anxiolytic, attentional, and/or affective mechanisms.
OBJECTIVE: Immersive virtual reality (VR) distraction provides clinically effective pain relief and increases subjective reports of "fun" in medical settings of procedural pain. The goal of this study was to better describe the variable of "fun" associated with VR distraction analgesia using the circumplex model (pleasure/arousal) of affect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-four healthy volunteers (mean age, 29 years; 37 females) received a standardized, 18-minute, multimodal pain sequence (alternating thermal heat and electrical stimulation to distal extremities) while receiving immersive, interactive VR distraction. Subjects rated both their subjective pain intensity and fun using 0-10 Graphic Rating Scales, as well as the pleasantness of their emotional valence and their state of arousal on 9-point scales. RESULTS: Compared with pain stimulation in the control (baseline, no VR) condition, immersive VR distraction significantly reduced subjective pain intensity (P < 0.001). During VR distraction, compared with those reporting negative affect, subjects reporting positive affect did so more frequently (41 percent versus 9 percent), as well as reporting both greater pain reduction (22 percent versus 1 percent) and fun scores (7.0 ± 1.9 versus 2.4 ± 1.4). Several factors-lower anxiety, greater fun, greater presence in the VR environment, and positive emotional valence-were associated with subjective analgesia during VR distraction. CONCLUSIONS: Immersive VR distraction reduces subjective pain intensity induced by multimodal experimental nociception. Subjects who report less anxiety, more fun, more VR presence, and more positive emotional valence during VR distraction are more likely to report subjective pain reduction. These findings indicate VR distraction analgesia may be mediated through anxiolytic, attentional, and/or affective mechanisms.
Authors: Chantal Berna; Siri Leknes; Emily A Holmes; Robert R Edwards; Guy M Goodwin; Irene Tracey Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-03-29 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Hunter G Hoffman; Eric J Seibel; Todd L Richards; Thomas A Furness; David R Patterson; Sam R Sharar Journal: J Pain Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Hunter G Hoffman; Sam R Sharar; Barbara Coda; John J Everett; Marcia Ciol; Todd Richards; David R Patterson Journal: Pain Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Hunter G Hoffman; David R Patterson; Jeff Magula; Gretchen J Carrougher; Karen Zeltzer; Stephen Dagadakis; Sam R Sharar Journal: J Clin Psychol Date: 2004-02
Authors: Hunter G Hoffman; David R Patterson; Eric Seibel; Maryam Soltani; Laura Jewett-Leahy; Sam R Sharar Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Hunter G Hoffman; Walter J Meyer; Maribel Ramirez; Linda Roberts; Eric J Seibel; Barbara Atzori; Sam R Sharar; David R Patterson Journal: Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw Date: 2014-06
Authors: Maryam Soltani; Sydney A Drever; Hunter G Hoffman; Sam R Sharar; Shelley A Wiechman; Mark P Jensen; David R Patterson Journal: Rehabil Psychol Date: 2018-10-04
Authors: David R Patterson; Sydney Drever; Maryam Soltani; Sam R Sharar; Shelley Wiechman; Walter J Meyer; Hunter G Hoffman Journal: Burns Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 2.609
Authors: Jason Ju In Chan; Cheng Teng Yeam; Hwei Min Kee; Chin Wen Tan; Rehena Sultana; Alex Tiong Heng Sia; Ban Leong Sng Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: David R Patterson; Hunter G Hoffman; Gloria Chambers; Devon Bennetts; Harley H Hunner; Shelley A Wiechman; Azucena Garcia-Palacios; Mark P Jensen Journal: Int J Clin Exp Hypn Date: 2021-03-16