Literature DB >> 27162725

Optimal incision sites to reduce corneal aberration variations after small incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Ling Chu1, Jiang-Yue Zhao2, Jin-Song Zhang2, Jie Meng2, Ming-Wu Wang3, Ya-Jing Yang2, Jia-Ming Yu2.   

Abstract

AIM: To analyze the effect of steep meridian small incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery on anterior, posterior and total corneal wavefront aberration.
METHODS: Steep meridian small incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery was performed in age-related cataract patients which were divided into three groups according to the incision site: 12 o'clock, 9 o'clock and between 9 and 12 o'clock (BENT) incision groups. The preoperative and 3-month postoperative root mean square (RMS) values of anterior, posterior and total corneal wavefront aberration including coma, spherical aberration, and total higher-order aberrations (HOAs), were measured by Pentacam scheimpflug imaging. The mean preoperative and postoperative corneal wavefront aberrations were documented.
RESULTS: Total corneal aberration and total lower-order aberrations decreased significantly in three groups after operation. RMS value of total HOAs decreased significantly postoperatively in the 12 o'clock incision group (P<0.001). Corneal spherical aberration was statistically significantly lower after steep meridian small incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery in BENT incision group (P<0.05) and Pearson correlation analysis indicated that spherical aberration changes had no significant relationship with total astigmatism changes in all three corneal incision location.
CONCLUSION: Corneal incision of phacoemulsification cataract surgery can affect corneal wavefront aberration. The 12 o'clock corneal incision eliminated more HOAs and the spherical aberrations decreased in BENT incision group obviously when we selected steep meridian small incision. Cataract lens replacement using wavefront-corrected intraocular lens combined with optimized corneal incision site would improve ocular aberration results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cataract surgery; corneal aberration; corneal incision

Year:  2016        PMID: 27162725      PMCID: PMC4853348          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2016.04.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  20 in total

1.  Relationship between aspheric IOL power and spherical aberration.

Authors:  James McKelvie; Brian McArdle; Charles McGhee
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  High-order aberrations in pseudophakia with different IOLs.

Authors:  Arthur C K Cheng; Dennis S C Lam
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Comparison of contrast sensitivity, depth of field and ocular wavefront aberrations in eyes with an IOL with zero versus positive spherical aberration.

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Mujtaba A Qazi; Keith H Edwards; Jeff P Sanderson; Edwin J Sarver
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  In vitro strehl ratios with spherical, aberration-free, average, and customized spherical aberration-correcting intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Stefan Pieh; Werner Fiala; Andre Malz; Wilhelm Stork
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  The shape of posterior corneal surface in normal, post-LASIK, and post-epi-LASIK eyes.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Yan Wang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Quality of life evaluation after implantation of 2 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal model.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Ana B Plaza-Puche; David P Piñero; Francisco Amparo; Jose L Rodríguez-Prats; María José Ayala
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Comparison of visual outcomes, photopic contrast sensitivity, wavefront analysis, and patient satisfaction following cataract extraction and IOL implantation: aspheric vs spherical acrylic lenses.

Authors:  H P Sandoval; L E Fernández de Castro; D T Vroman; K D Solomon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Optical quality of the eye in subjects with normal and excellent visual acuity.

Authors:  Eloy A Villegas; Encarna Alcón; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Changes in corneal wavefront aberrations in microincision and small-incision cataract surgery.

Authors:  NuXia Tong; Ji C He; Fan Lu; QinMei Wang; Jia Qu; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Relationship between corneal aberrations and contrast sensitivity after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Tetsuo Ueda; Yoshiaki Nawa; Kozo Masuda; Hidetoshi Ishibashi; Yoshiaki Hara; Hiroshi Uozato
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.211

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Reviewing the visual benefits of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: Can we improve our outcomes?

Authors:  Michael Lawless; Lewis Levitz; Chris Hodge
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Comparison of Outcomes after Phacoemulsification with Two Different Corneal Incision Distances Anterior to the Limbus.

Authors:  Lijun Wang; Lin Zhao; Xiting Yang; Yi Zhang; Dingying Liao; Jianming Wang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Site of clear corneal incision in cataract surgery and its effects on surgically induced astigmatism.

Authors:  Junjie Piao; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.