Literature DB >> 18552387

Optical quality of the eye in subjects with normal and excellent visual acuity.

Eloy A Villegas1, Encarna Alcón, Pablo Artal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the relationship between visual acuity (VA) and the eye's optical quality in subjects with normal and excellent spatial vision. VA ranged from decimal values of 1.0 (20/20) to 2.0 (20/10) when defocus and astigmatism were carefully corrected.
METHODS: In 60 eyes of young subjects, visual and optical performance with the natural pupil were measured. A forced-choice procedure was used to measure tumbling-E high-contrast VA (HCVA) and low-contrast VA (LCVA). Wavefront aberration (WA) was measured using a Hartmann-Shack sensor. The associated point-spread function (PSF) and modulation transfer function (MTF) were also estimated. High-order aberrations (HOA) and several image quality parameters were represented as a function of VA. Subjects were classified into three groups according to their VA, and average optical parameters were calculated.
RESULTS: Coma and trefoil vary between 0 and 0.5 mum, and spherical aberration ranges from -0.40 mum to +0.45 mum, with an average value of approximately zero. LCVA is not correlated with any of the aberration terms. Coma and spherical aberration are not correlated with HCVA. However, eyes with trefoil equal to or higher than 0.25 mum have an HCVA less than 1.5. The average optical quality in eyes with HCVA greater than 1.4 is slightly better than in eyes with normal VA. However, some eyes had relatively poor image quality and excellent VA.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant correlations were found between VA measurements and the optical quality of the eye in young subjects with normal or excellent spatial vision. Some subjects with normal degrees of aberrations attained excellent VA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18552387     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  17 in total

1.  Analysis of the optical quality by determining the modulation transfer function for anterior corneal surface in myopes.

Authors:  Yan-Zhen Zheng; Yan-Peng Chen; Yan Qiu; Guo-Guang Zhai; Yao-Yu Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Optimal incision sites to reduce corneal aberration variations after small incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Authors:  Ling Chu; Jiang-Yue Zhao; Jin-Song Zhang; Jie Meng; Ming-Wu Wang; Ya-Jing Yang; Jia-Ming Yu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Objective functional visual outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with good preoperative visual acuity.

Authors:  X Zhu; H Ye; W He; J Yang; J Dai; Y Lu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Visual acuity of pseudophakic patients predicted from in-vitro measurements of intraocular lenses with different design.

Authors:  Fidel Vega; Maria S Millán; Nuria Garzón; Irene Altemir; Francisco Poyales; Jose Manuel Larrosa
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Pilot study of hyperopic LASIK using the solid-state laser technology.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Francisco J Blanes-Mompó; Pedro Ruiz-Fortes; Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí; Antonio Alzamora-Rodríguez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Determinants of contrast sensitivity for the tumbling E and Landolt C.

Authors:  Kenneth R Alexander; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Contributions of optical and non-optical blur to variation in visual acuity.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Mahnaz Shahidi; Raymond A Applegate; Ruth Zelkha; Kenneth R Alexander
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Change in visual acuity is highly correlated with change in six image quality metrics independent of wavefront error and/or pupil diameter.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Edwin J Sarver; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Is visual resolution after adaptive optics correction susceptible to perceptual learning?

Authors:  Ethan A Rossi; Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.004

10.  Individual neural transfer function affects the prediction of subjective depth of focus.

Authors:  Alexander Leube; Tim Schilling; Arne Ohlendorf; David Kern; Alex G Ochakovski; M Dominik Fischer; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.