Literature DB >> 17618241

Comparison of visual outcomes, photopic contrast sensitivity, wavefront analysis, and patient satisfaction following cataract extraction and IOL implantation: aspheric vs spherical acrylic lenses.

H P Sandoval1, L E Fernández de Castro, D T Vroman, K D Solomon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine vision quality when testing two acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs), AcrysofIQ and AcrysofSingle-Piece, after routine cataract extraction and IOL implantation.SettingStorm Eye Institute and Magill Research Center for Vision Correction, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
METHODS: Prospective, randomized, double-masked study that included 53 eyes of 27 patients who underwent bilateral cataract extraction and IOL implantation. Patients were randomly divided into two groups depending on the type of IOL implanted: AcrysofIQ or AcrysofSingle-Piece. Preoperative, 1- and 3-month postoperative evaluations included ETDRS visual acuity, photopic contrast sensitivity, pupil size, wavefront testing, and a subjective questionnaire. Comparisons between the two groups and comparisons to baseline were made at each visit. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Preoperative, statistically significant differences were evident in response to the subjective questionnaire (near activities, driving dimensions, and overall score) between the two groups. Postoperatively there was a greater increase in contrast sensitivity at 1 and 3 months in the AcrysofIQ group when compared to baseline. Patients with AcrysofIQ IOL had a significant reduction in total high-order aberrations (HOA) and spherical aberration (SA) when compared to those patients with AcrysofSingle-Piece at 1 and 3 months and to baseline. Postoperative patient satisfaction showed no difference among the groups.
CONCLUSION: The use of a new aspheric acrylic IOL may improve the quality of vision as a result of the reduction of total HOA and SA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17618241     DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of contrast sensitivity, depth of field and ocular wavefront aberrations in eyes with an IOL with zero versus positive spherical aberration.

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Mujtaba A Qazi; Keith H Edwards; Jeff P Sanderson; Edwin J Sarver
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Optimal incision sites to reduce corneal aberration variations after small incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Authors:  Ling Chu; Jiang-Yue Zhao; Jin-Song Zhang; Jie Meng; Ming-Wu Wang; Ya-Jing Yang; Jia-Ming Yu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Higher order aberration comparison between two aspherical intraocular lenses: MC6125AS and Akreos advanced optics.

Authors:  Mohammad Taher Rajabi; Sara Korouji; Mahgol Farjadnia; Mohammad Naderan; Mohammad Bagher Rajabi; Bahram Khosravi; Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaie
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Tilt and decentration of an intraocular lens implanted in the ciliary sulcus after capsular bag defect during cataract surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Sauer; Ulrich Mester
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  [Aspheric intraocular lenses].

Authors:  T Kohnen; O K Klaproth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.174

6.  Correlation between contrast sensitivity and higher-order aberration based on pupil diameter after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Takefumi Yamaguchi; Kazuno Negishi; Kazuhiko Ohnuma; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-07

7.  Evaluation of actual retinal images produced by misaligned aspheric intraocular lenses in a model eye.

Authors:  Takashi Fujikado; Makoto Saika
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-28

Review 8.  Clinical properties of a novel, glistening-free, single-piece, hydrophobic acrylic IOL.

Authors:  Mark Packer; Mohan Rajan; Edoardo Ligabue; Peter Heiner
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.