Andrew S Kennedy1, David Ball1, Steven J Cohen1, Michael Cohn1, Douglas M Coldwell1, Alain Drooz1, Eduardo Ehrenwald1, Samir Kanani1, Steven C Rose1, Charles W Nutting1, Fred M Moeslein1, Michael A Savin1, Sabine Schirm1, Samuel G Putnam1, Navesh K Sharma1, Eric A Wang1. 1. 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases Outcomes after RadioEmbolization (MORE) was an investigator-initiated case-control study to assess the experience of 11 US centers who treated liver-dominant metastases from colorectal cancer (mCRC) using radioembolization [selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT)] with yttrium-90-((90)Y)-labeled resin microspheres. METHODS: Data from 606 consecutive patients who received radioembolization between July 2002 and December 2011 were collected by an independent research organization. Adverse events (AEs) and survival were compared across lines of treatment using Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier estimates, respectively. RESULTS: Patients received a median of 2 (range, 0-6) lines of prior chemotherapy; 35.1% had limited extrahepatic metastases. Median tumor-to-liver ratio and -activity administered at first procedure were 15% and 1.17 GBq, respectively. Hospital stay was <24 hours in 97.8% cases. Common grade ≥3 AEs over 184 days follow-up were: abdominal pain (6.1%), fatigue (5.5%), hyperbilirubinemia (5.4%), ascites (3.6%) and gastrointestinal ulceration (1.7%). There was no statistical difference in AEs across treatment lines (P>0.05). Median survivals [95% confidence interval (CI)] following radioembolization as a 2(nd)-line, 3(rd)-line, or 4(th)-plus line were 13.0 (range, 10.5-14.6), 9.0 (range, 7.8-11.0), and 8.1 (range, 6.4-9.3) months, respectively; and significantly prolonged in patients with ECOG 0 vs. ≥1 (P=0.009). Statistically significant independent variables for survival at radioembolization were: disease stage [extrahepatic metastases, extent of liver involvement (tumor-to-treated-liver ratio)], liver function (uncontrolled ascites, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate transaminase), leukocytes, and prior chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Radioembolization appears to have a favorable risk/benefit profile, even among mCRC patients who had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND:Metastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases Outcomes after RadioEmbolization (MORE) was an investigator-initiated case-control study to assess the experience of 11 US centers who treated liver-dominant metastases from colorectal cancer (mCRC) using radioembolization [selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT)] with yttrium-90-((90)Y)-labeled resin microspheres. METHODS: Data from 606 consecutive patients who received radioembolization between July 2002 and December 2011 were collected by an independent research organization. Adverse events (AEs) and survival were compared across lines of treatment using Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier estimates, respectively. RESULTS:Patients received a median of 2 (range, 0-6) lines of prior chemotherapy; 35.1% had limited extrahepatic metastases. Median tumor-to-liver ratio and -activity administered at first procedure were 15% and 1.17 GBq, respectively. Hospital stay was <24 hours in 97.8% cases. Common grade ≥3 AEs over 184 days follow-up were: abdominal pain (6.1%), fatigue (5.5%), hyperbilirubinemia (5.4%), ascites (3.6%) and gastrointestinal ulceration (1.7%). There was no statistical difference in AEs across treatment lines (P>0.05). Median survivals [95% confidence interval (CI)] following radioembolization as a 2(nd)-line, 3(rd)-line, or 4(th)-plus line were 13.0 (range, 10.5-14.6), 9.0 (range, 7.8-11.0), and 8.1 (range, 6.4-9.3) months, respectively; and significantly prolonged in patients with ECOG 0 vs. ≥1 (P=0.009). Statistically significant independent variables for survival at radioembolization were: disease stage [extrahepatic metastases, extent of liver involvement (tumor-to-treated-liver ratio)], liver function (uncontrolled ascites, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate transaminase), leukocytes, and prior chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Radioembolization appears to have a favorable risk/benefit profile, even among mCRC patients who had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy.
Authors: Jaafar Bennouna; Javier Sastre; Dirk Arnold; Pia Österlund; Richard Greil; Eric Van Cutsem; Roger von Moos; Jose Maria Viéitez; Olivier Bouché; Christophe Borg; Claus-Christoph Steffens; Vicente Alonso-Orduña; Christoph Schlichting; Irmarie Reyes-Rivera; Belguendouz Bendahmane; Thierry André; Stefan Kubicka Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Riad Salem; Kenneth G Thurston; Brian I Carr; James E Goin; Jean-Francois H Geschwind Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Axel Grothey; Eric Van Cutsem; Alberto Sobrero; Salvatore Siena; Alfredo Falcone; Marc Ychou; Yves Humblet; Olivier Bouché; Laurent Mineur; Carlo Barone; Antoine Adenis; Josep Tabernero; Takayuki Yoshino; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent; Frank Cihon; Lisa Cupit; Andrea Wagner; Dirk Laurent Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Andrew S Kennedy; Patrick McNeillie; William A Dezarn; Charles Nutting; Bruno Sangro; Dan Wertman; Michael Garafalo; David Liu; Douglas Coldwell; Michael Savin; Tobias Jakobs; Steven Rose; Richard Warner; Dennis Carter; Stephen Sapareto; Subir Nag; Seza Gulec; Allison Calkins; Vanessa L Gates; Riad Salem Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: L Lim; P Gibbs; D Yip; J D Shapiro; R Dowling; D Smith; A Little; W Bailey; M Liechtenstein Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Waleed Shady; Sirish Kishore; Somali Gavane; Richard K Do; Joseph R Osborne; Gary A Ulaner; Mithat Gonen; Etay Ziv; Franz E Boas; Constantinos T Sofocleous Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: T F Jakobs; K J Paprottka; F Raeßler; F Strobl; S Lehner; H Ilhan; C G Trumm; W P Fendler; W Sommer; P M Paprottka Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Aaron K T Tong; Yung Hsiang Kao; Chow Wei Too; Kenneth F W Chin; David C E Ng; Pierce K H Chow Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Andrew S Kennedy; David Ball; Steven J Cohen; Michael Cohn; Douglas M Coldwell; Alain Drooz; Edward Ehrenwald; Samir Kanani; Fred M Moeslein; Charles W Nutting; Samuel G Putnam; Steven C Rose; Michael Savin; Sabine Schirm; Navesh K Sharma; Eric Wang Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2017-02
Authors: Kazim H Narsinh; Mark Van Buskirk; Andrew S Kennedy; Mohammed Suhail; Naif Alsaikhan; Carl K Hoh; Kenneth Thurston; Jeet Minocha; David S Ball; Steven J Cohen; Michael Cohn; Douglas M Coldwell; Alain Drooz; Eduardo Ehrenwald; Samir Kanani; Charles W Nutting; Fred M Moeslein; Michael A Savin; Sabine Schirm; Samuel G Putnam; Navesh K Sharma; Eric A Wang; Steven C Rose Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Zhongzhi Jia; Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli; Gregory Frey; David M Sella; J Mark McKinney; Weiping Wang Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 4.553