Literature DB >> 15883903

Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Anthony J Viera1, Joanne M Garrett.   

Abstract

Items such as physical exam findings, radiographic interpretations, or other diagnostic tests often rely on some degree of subjective interpretation by observers. Studies that measure the agreement between two or more observers should include a statistic that takes into account the fact that observers will sometimes agree or disagree simply by chance. The kappa statistic (or kappa coefficient) is the most commonly used statistic for this purpose. A kappa of 1 indicates perfect agreement, whereas a kappa of 0 indicates agreement equivalent to chance. A limitation of kappa is that it is affected by the prevalence of the finding under observation. Methods to overcome this limitation have been described.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15883903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  1624 in total

1.  Learning and networking: utilization of a primary care listserv by pharmacists.

Authors:  Melanie Trinacty; Barbara Farrell; Theresa J Schindel; Lisa Sunstrum; Lisa Dolovich; Natalie Kennie; Grant Russell; Nancy Waite
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-09

2.  Assessment of Safe Sleep: Validation of the Parent Newborn Sleep Safety Survey.

Authors:  Leanne Whiteside-Mansell; Rosemary Nabaweesi; Alison Rose Caballero; Samantha Hope Mullins; Beverly Kaye Miller; Mary Elizabeth Aitken
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.145

3.  The efficacy of real-time colour Doppler flow imaging on endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps.

Authors:  Su Young Kim; Jae Hee Cho; Eui Joo Kim; Dong Hae Chung; Kun Kuk Kim; Yeon Ho Park; Yeon Suk Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Predictive factors for brace treatment outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a best-evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Manon van den Bogaart; Barend J van Royen; Tsjitske M Haanstra; Marinus de Kleuver; Sayf S A Faraj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of PET/MRI to PET/CT-acquired FDG brain exams for seizure focus detection: a prospective study.

Authors:  Michael J Paldino; Erica Yang; Jeremy Y Jones; Nadia Mahmood; Andrew Sher; Wei Zhang; Shireen Hayatghaibi; Ramkumar Krishnamurthy; Victor Seghers
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-05-16

6.  Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Probiotic, Herbal and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash on Gingival Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Manjiri Abhay Deshmukh; Arun Suresh Dodamani; Gundabaktha Karibasappa; Mahesh Ravindra Khairnar; Rahul Gaybarao Naik; Harish Chaitram Jadhav
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

7.  Comparison of blood pressure measurements obtained in the home setting: analysis of the Health Measures at Home Study.

Authors:  Tatiana Nwankwo; Renee Gindi; Te-Ching Chen; Adena Galinsky; Ivey Miller; Ana Terry
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.444

8.  Assessing 3D T2 FSE sequence for identification of the normal appendix: working toward a single-sequence MR appendicitis protocol.

Authors:  Nattinee Leelakanok; Andrew S Phelps; Matthew A Zapala; Kambrie Kato; Michael Ohliger; Yi Li; Jesse Courtier
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-07-19

9.  Comparison of 3 methods of onychectomy.

Authors:  Kyle Clark; Trina Bailey; Paul Rist; Andrea Matthews
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.008

10.  Quantifying federal funding and scholarly output related to the academic emergency medicine consensus conferences.

Authors:  Daniel K Nishijima; Tu Dinh; Larissa May; Kabir Yadav; Gary M Gaddis; David C Cone
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.