| Literature DB >> 27152952 |
Isabel Meister1,2, Jana Kovac1,2, Urs Duthaler1,2, Peter Odermatt2,3, Jörg Huwyler4, Fiona Vanobberghen2,3, Somphou Sayasone5, Jennifer Keiser1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Praziquantel (PZQ) is the treatment of choice for infections with the liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini, a major health problem in Southeast Asia. However, pharmacokinetic (PK) studies investigating the disposition of PZQ enantiomers (R- and S-PZQ) and its main metabolite, R-trans-4-OH-PZQ, in diseased patients are lacking. The implementation of a dried blood spot (DBS) sampling technique would ease the performance of PK studies in remote areas without clinical facilities. The aim of the present study is to provide data on the disposition of PZQ enantiomers and R-trans-4-OH-PZQ in opisthorchiasis patients and to validate the use of DBS compared to plasma and blood sampling. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27152952 PMCID: PMC4859549 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004700
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Chemical structures of PZQ, the main metabolite trans-4-OH and PZQ-d11 (internal standard), with the chiral centre represented with a shaded circle.
Characteristics of participants and O. viverrini cure rates.
| Median age (range) [years] | Sex [% females] | Median weight (range) [kg] | Pre-treatment [EPG] Geometric mean | Post-treatment [EPG] Geometric mean | Cure rate [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 (25–46) | 67 | 56 (40–77) | 3653 | 0 | 100 |
Fig 2Plasma concentrations for R-PZQ (1), S-PZQ (2) and R-trans-4-OH (3) over time and across patients (patient 2 sketched with a star) and analyte concentrations across the 3 matrices in patient 1.
Median (range) of AUC0–24h, t1/2, Cmax and Tmax in plasma across 9 patients.
| Analyte | AUC0–24h [μg/ml*h] | t1/2 [h] | Cmax [μg/ml] | Tmax [h] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 (0.8–10.7) | 1.1 (1.0–3.0) | 0.2 (0.1–1.1) | 7.00 (4.0–11.8) | |
| 9.0 (6.1–26.3) | 3.3 (1.9–3.7) | 0.9 (0.6–2.3) | 7.00 (4.0–11.8) | |
| 188.7 (157.2–257.4) | 6.4 (4.1–7.1) | 13.9 (13.1–17.9) | 8.7 (8.0–12.0) |
Concordance of blood and DBS compared to plasma measurements, evaluated with Pearson’s correlation and percentage ratio with their 95% limits of agreement (LoA).
| Analyte | Matrix | Correlation coefficient | Percentage ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| blood (n = 91) | 0.995 | 79.0 (59.1; 99.0) | |
| DBS (n = 45) | 0.994 | 89.6 (55.6; 123.6) | |
| blood (n = 91) | 0.963 | 93.9 (54.5; 133.3) | |
| DBS (n = 45) | 0.970 | 92.1 (44.4; 139.8) | |
| blood (n = 91) | 0.948 | 122.0 (94.0; 145.0) | |
| DBS (n = 45) | 0.921 | 110.6 (77.0; 144.3) |
aThe percentage ratio is computed as blood or DBS values divided by plasma measurements averaged across patients and time points and presented as percentage to the plasma values
bThe 95% limits of agreement for the individual data were calculated with the modified Bland-Altman method for multiple measurements per individual
Fig 3Bland-Altman plots of measurement performed with blood or DBS compared to plasma values for R-PZQ, S-PZQ and R-trans-4-OH with mean ratio sketched with a solid line and 95% limits of agreement with dashed lines.
Fig 4Bland-Altman plots of AUC values obtained from blood or DBS compared to plasma AUCs for R-PZQ, S-PZQ and R-trans-4-OH with mean ratio sketched with a solid line and 95% limits of agreement with dashed lines.
Patient 2 is depicted with a triangle (▲).
Mean percentage ratios of AUC0–24h values in blood or DBS compared to plasma and lower and upper 95% limits of agreement (LoA) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI).
| Mean ratio | Lower LoA | Upper LoA [%] (CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyte | blood | DBS | blood | DBS | blood | DBS |
| 81.9 (76.8;86.6) | 92.5 (82.9;102.2) | 69.6 (61.4;77.9) | 68.0 (51.3;84.7) | 94.1 (85.8;108.9) | 117.1 (100.4;133.8) | |
| 85.4 (76.8;93.9) | 87.0 (73.2;100.7) | 63.6 (48.8;78.4) | 52.0 (28.2;75.7) | 107.2 (92.4;122.0) | 122.0 (98.2;145.7) | |
| 111.2 (101.5;120.9) | 107.6 (97.9;117.4) | 86.5 (69.8;103.3) | 81.4 (63.6;99.2) | 135.9 (119.1;152.6) | 133.9 (116.1;151.7) | |
aThe percentage ratio is computed as blood or DBS AUC0–24h values divided by plasma AUC0–24h values averaged across patients and presented as percentage to the plasma values.
bThe 95% limits of agreement for AUC0–24h values were calculated with the conventional Bland-Altman method.
Percentage ratios of t1/2, Cmax and Tmax in blood or DBS compared to plasma.
| t1/2 | Cmax | Tmax | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyte | blood [%] | DBS [%] | blood [%] | DBS [%] | blood [%] | DBS [%] |
| 89.4 | 121.6 | 89.4 | 92.0 | 100.0 | 101.0 | |
| 81.8 | 100.0 | 81.8 | 96.5 | 100.0 | 99.4 | |
| 105.2 | 75.3 | 105.2 | 103.5 | 115.4 | 111.5 | |