AIM: This study investigated the kinetic disposition, metabolism and enantioselectivity of albendazole (ABZ) and praziquantel (PZQ) administered alone and in combination to healthy volunteers. METHODS: A randomized crossover study was carried out in three phases (n= 9), in which some volunteers started in phase 1 (400 mg ABZ), others in phase 2 (1500 mg PZQ), and the remaining volunteers in phase 3 (400 mg ABZ + 1500 mg PZQ). Serial blood samples were collected from 0-48 h after drug administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a monocompartmental model with lag time and were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test; P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The administration of PZQ increased the plasma concentrations of (+)-ASOX (albendazole sulphoxide) by 264% (AUC 0.99 vs. 2.59 µg ml(-1) h), (-)-ASOX by 358% (0.14 vs. 0.50 µg ml(-1) h) and albendazole sulfone (ASON) by 187% (0.17 vs. 0.32 µg ml(-1) h). The administration of ABZ did not change the kinetic disposition of (+)-(S)-PZQ (-)-(R)-4-OHPZQ or (+)-(S)-4-OHPZQ, but increased the plasma concentration of (-)-(R)-PZQ by 64.77% (AUC 0.52 vs. 0.86 µg ml(-1) h). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic interaction between ABZ and PZQ in healthy volunteers was demonstrated by the observation of increased plasma concentrations of ASON, both ASOX enantiomers and (-)-(R)-PZQ. Clinically, the combination of ABZ and PZQ may improve the therapeutic efficacy as a consequence of higher concentration of both active drugs. On the other hand, the magnitude of this elevation may represent an increased risk of side effects, requiring, certainly, reduction of the dosage. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination.
RCT Entities:
AIM: This study investigated the kinetic disposition, metabolism and enantioselectivity of albendazole (ABZ) and praziquantel (PZQ) administered alone and in combination to healthy volunteers. METHODS: A randomized crossover study was carried out in three phases (n= 9), in which some volunteers started in phase 1 (400 mg ABZ), others in phase 2 (1500 mg PZQ), and the remaining volunteers in phase 3 (400 mg ABZ + 1500 mg PZQ). Serial blood samples were collected from 0-48 h after drug administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a monocompartmental model with lag time and were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test; P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The administration of PZQ increased the plasma concentrations of (+)-ASOX (albendazole sulphoxide) by 264% (AUC 0.99 vs. 2.59 µg ml(-1) h), (-)-ASOX by 358% (0.14 vs. 0.50 µg ml(-1) h) and albendazole sulfone (ASON) by 187% (0.17 vs. 0.32 µg ml(-1) h). The administration of ABZ did not change the kinetic disposition of (+)-(S)-PZQ (-)-(R)-4-OHPZQ or (+)-(S)-4-OHPZQ, but increased the plasma concentration of (-)-(R)-PZQ by 64.77% (AUC 0.52 vs. 0.86 µg ml(-1) h). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic interaction between ABZ and PZQ in healthy volunteers was demonstrated by the observation of increased plasma concentrations of ASON, both ASOX enantiomers and (-)-(R)-PZQ. Clinically, the combination of ABZ and PZQ may improve the therapeutic efficacy as a consequence of higher concentration of both active drugs. On the other hand, the magnitude of this elevation may represent an increased risk of side effects, requiring, certainly, reduction of the dosage. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination.
Authors: Renata Monteiro Lima; Maria Augusta Drago Ferreira; Teresa Maria de Jesus Ponte; Maria Paula Marques; Osvaldo Massaiti Takayanagui; Hector Hugo Garcia; Eduardo Barbosa Coelho; Pierina Sueli Bonato; Vera Lucia Lanchote Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Vera L Lanchote; Fabíola S Garcia; Sônia A C Dreossi; Osvaldo Massaiti Takayanagui Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: K Pengsaa; K Na-Bangchang; K Limkittikul; K Kabkaew; K Lapphra; C Sirivichayakul; P Wisetsing; C Pojjaroen-Anant; P Chanthavanich; A Subchareon Journal: Ann Trop Med Parasitol Date: 2004-06
Authors: Xue-Qing Li; Anders Björkman; Tommy B Andersson; Lars L Gustafsson; Collen M Masimirembwa Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2003-08-12 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Hector H García; Carlton A W Evans; Theodore E Nash; Osvaldo M Takayanagui; A Clinton White; David Botero; Vedantam Rajshekhar; Victor C W Tsang; Peter M Schantz; James C Allan; Ana Flisser; Dolores Correa; Elsa Sarti; Jon S Friedland; S Manuel Martinez; Armando E Gonzalez; Robert H Gilman; Oscar H Del Brutto Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Nuno Vale; Maria João Gouveia; Gabriel Rinaldi; Paul J Brindley; Fátima Gärtner; José M Correia da Costa Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Gianfranco Arroyo; Javier A Bustos; Andres G Lescano; Isidro Gonzales; Herbert Saavedra; Silvia Rodriguez; E Javier Pretell; Pierina S Bonato; Vera L Lanchote; Osvaldo M Takayanagui; John Horton; Armando E Gonzalez; Robert H Gilman; Hector H Garcia Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Lucía Alvela-Suárez; Virginia Velasco-Tirado; Moncef Belhassen-Garcia; Ignacio Novo-Veleiro; Javier Pardo-Lledías; Angela Romero-Alegría; Luis Pérez del Villar; María Paz Valverde-Merino; Miguel Cordero-Sánchez Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Hector H Garcia; Andres G Lescano; Vera L Lanchote; E Javier Pretell; Isidro Gonzales; Javier A Bustos; Osvaldo M Takayanagui; Pierina S Bonato; John Horton; Herbert Saavedra; Armando E Gonzalez; Robert H Gilman Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Anne Lespine; Cécile Ménez; Catherine Bourguinat; Roger K Prichard Journal: Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Roger K Prichard; María-Gloria Basáñez; Boakye A Boatin; James S McCarthy; Héctor H García; Guo-Jing Yang; Banchob Sripa; Sara Lustigman Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2012-04-24