Literature DB >> 22129533

Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison.

J Martin Bland1, Douglas G Altman.   

Abstract

Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. By J. Martin Bland, Douglas G. Altman. Lancet 1986; 1(8476):307-10. Abstract reprinted with permission of Elsevier, copyright 1986. In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analyzed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22129533     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823d7784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  69 in total

1.  Corneal endothelial cell analysis using two non-contact specular microscopes in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Manuel Garza-Leon
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  A Novel ImageJ Macro for Automated Cell Death Quantitation in the Retina.

Authors:  Daniel E Maidana; Pavlina Tsoka; Bo Tian; Bernard Dib; Hidetaka Matsumoto; Keiko Kataoka; Haijiang Lin; Joan W Miller; Demetrios G Vavvas
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Continuous cardiac output measurement by un-calibrated pulse wave analysis and pulmonary artery catheter in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michael T Ganter; Jamal A Alhashemi; Adel M Al-Shabasy; Ursina M Schmid; Peter Schott; Sanaa A Shalabi; Ahmed M Badri; Sonja Hartnack; Christoph K Hofer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Visual evoked potentials can be reliably recorded using noninvasive epidermal electrodes in the anesthetized rat.

Authors:  Roberto Santangelo; Valerio Castoldi; Raffaele D'Isa; Silvia Marenna; Su-Chun Huang; Marco Cursi; Giancarlo Comi; Letizia Leocani
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Accuracy of trabecular structure by HR-pQCT compared to gold standard μCT in the radius and tibia of patients with osteoporosis and long-term bisphosphonate therapy.

Authors:  M Krause; O Museyko; S Breer; B Wulff; C Duckstein; E Vettorazzi; C Glueer; K Püschel; K Engelke; M Amling
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Neck range of motion measurements using a new three-dimensional motion analysis system: validity and repeatability.

Authors:  Haruhi Inokuchi; Michio Tojima; Hiroshi Mano; Yuki Ishikawa; Naoshi Ogata; Nobuhiko Haga
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Selection of cuffed endotracheal tube for children with congenital heart disease based on an ultrasound-based linear regression formula.

Authors:  Kan Zhang; Rui-Jing Ma; Ji-Jian Zheng; Yi-Qi Chen; Ma-Zhong Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Accuracy, validity, and reliability of the infrared optical head tracker (IOHT).

Authors:  Siamak Sabour; Fariba Ghassemi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography--is this correct?

Authors:  Siamak Sabour; Elahe Vahid Dastjerdi; Maryam Moezizadeh
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Reliability of shade selection using an intraoral spectrophotometer: common mistakes in reliability analysis.

Authors:  S Sabour; M Moezizadeh; E Vahid Dastjerdi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.