Literature DB >> 27135052

Electrochemiluminescence at Bare and DNA-Coated Graphite Electrodes in 3D-Printed Fluidic Devices.

Gregory W Bishop1, Jennifer E Satterwhite-Warden1, Itti Bist1, Eric Chen1, James F Rusling2.   

Abstract

Clear plastic fluidic devices with ports for incorporating electrodes to enable electrochemiluminescence (ECL) measurements were prepared using a low-cost, desktop three-dimensional (3D) printer based on stereolithography. Electrodes consisted of 0.5 mm pencil graphite rods and 0.5 mm silver wires inserted into commercially available 1/4 in.-28 threaded fittings. A bioimaging system equipped with a CCD camera was used to measure ECL generated at electrodes and small arrays using 0.2 M phosphate buffer solutions containing tris(2,2'-bipyridyl)dichlororuthenium(II) hexahydrate ([Ru(bpy)3]2+) with 100 mM tri-n-propylamine (TPA) as the coreactant. ECL signals produced at pencil graphite working electrodes were linear with respect to [Ru(bpy)3]2+ concentration for 9-900 μM [Ru(bpy)3]2+. The detection limit was found to be 7 μM using the CCD camera with exposure time set at 10 s. Electrode-to-electrode ECL signals varied by ±7.5%. Device performance was further evaluated using pencil graphite electrodes coated with multilayer poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA)/DNA films. In these experiments, ECL resulted from the reaction of [Ru(bpy)3]3+ with guanines of DNA. ECL produced at these thin-film electrodes was linear with respect to [Ru(bpy)3]2+ concentration from 180 to 800 μM. These studies provide the first demonstration of ECL measurements obtained using a 3D-printed closed-channel fluidic device platform. The affordable, high-resolution 3D printer used in these studies enables easy, fast, and adaptable prototyping of fluidic devices capable of incorporating electrodes for measuring ECL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printed fluidics; DNA oxidation; biosensing; electrochemiluminescence; stereolithography

Year:  2015        PMID: 27135052      PMCID: PMC4847733          DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.5b00156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Sens        ISSN: 2379-3694            Impact factor:   7.711


  21 in total

1.  Prototyping of microfluidic devices in poly(dimethylsiloxane) using solid-object printing.

Authors:  J Cooper McDonald; Michael L Chabinyc; Steven J Metallo; Janelle R Anderson; Abraham D Stroock; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Electrogenerated chemiluminescence.

Authors:  Robert J Forster; Paolo Bertoncello; Tia E Keyes
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 10.745

3.  3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated valves.

Authors:  Chad I Rogers; Kamran Qaderi; Adam T Woolley; Gregory P Nordin
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Additive manufacturing. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects.

Authors:  John R Tumbleston; David Shirvanyants; Nikita Ermoshkin; Rima Janusziewicz; Ashley R Johnson; David Kelly; Kai Chen; Robert Pinschmidt; Jason P Rolland; Alexander Ermoshkin; Edward T Samulski; Joseph M DeSimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Configurable 3D-Printed millifluidic and microfluidic 'lab on a chip' reactionware devices.

Authors:  Philip J Kitson; Mali H Rosnes; Victor Sans; Vincenza Dragone; Leroy Cronin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Cost-effective three-dimensional printing of visibly transparent microchips within minutes.

Authors:  Aliaa I Shallan; Petr Smejkal; Monika Corban; Rosanne M Guijt; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Low cost lab-on-a-chip prototyping with a consumer grade 3D printer.

Authors:  Germán Comina; Anke Suska; Daniel Filippini
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

Authors:  Caroline A Schneider; Wayne S Rasband; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  3D-printed microfluidic automation.

Authors:  Anthony K Au; Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Lisa F Horowitz; Tim C Chang; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 6.799

10.  Mail-order microfluidics: evaluation of stereolithography for the production of microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Anthony K Au; Wonjae Lee; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 6.799

View more
  13 in total

1.  Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices.

Authors:  Michael J Beauchamp; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Automated 3D-printed unibody immunoarray for chemiluminescence detection of cancer biomarker proteins.

Authors:  C K Tang; A Vaze; J F Rusling
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Developing Microfluidic Sensing Devices Using 3D Printing.

Authors:  James F Rusling
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 7.711

4.  Automated 3-D Printed Arrays to Evaluate Genotoxic Chemistry: E-Cigarettes and Water Samples.

Authors:  Karteek Kadimisetty; Spundana Malla; James F Rusling
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 7.711

5.  Custom 3D printer and resin for 18 μm × 20 μm microfluidic flow channels.

Authors:  Hua Gong; Bryce P Bickham; Adam T Woolley; Gregory P Nordin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  3D-printed miniaturized fluidic tools in chemistry and biology.

Authors:  C K Dixit; K Kadimisetty; J Rusling
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 12.296

7.  Direct embedding and versatile placement of electrodes in 3D printed microfluidic-devices.

Authors:  Andre D Castiaux; Emily R Currens; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.616

8.  Automated 3D-Printed Microfluidic Array for Rapid Nanomaterial-Enhanced Detection of Multiple Proteins.

Authors:  Karteek Kadimisetty; Spundana Malla; Ketki S Bhalerao; Islam M Mosa; Snehasis Bhakta; Norman H Lee; James F Rusling
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 9.  3D-printed bioanalytical devices.

Authors:  Gregory W Bishop; Jennifer E Satterwhite-Warden; Karteek Kadimisetty; James F Rusling
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.874

Review 10.  3D Printed Microfluidics.

Authors:  Anna V Nielsen; Michael J Beauchamp; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 10.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.