Literature DB >> 27129417

Pushing the size limit of de novo structure ensemble prediction guided by sparse SDSL-EPR restraints to 200 residues: The monomeric and homodimeric forms of BAX.

Axel W Fischer1, Enrica Bordignon2, Stephanie Bleicken3, Ana J García-Sáez3, Gunnar Jeschke4, Jens Meiler5.   

Abstract

Structure determination remains a challenge for many biologically important proteins. In particular, proteins that adopt multiple conformations often evade crystallization in all biologically relevant states. Although computational de novo protein folding approaches often sample biologically relevant conformations, the selection of the most accurate model for different functional states remains a formidable challenge, in particular, for proteins with more than about 150 residues. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy can obtain limited structural information for proteins in well-defined biological states and thereby assist in selecting biologically relevant conformations. The present study demonstrates that de novo folding methods are able to accurately sample the folds of 192-residue long soluble monomeric Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX). The tertiary structures of the monomeric and homodimeric forms of BAX were predicted using the primary structure as well as 25 and 11 EPR distance restraints, respectively. The predicted models were subsequently compared to respective NMR/X-ray structures of BAX. EPR restraints improve the protein-size normalized root-mean-square-deviation (RMSD100) of the most accurate models with respect to the NMR/crystal structure from 5.9Å to 3.9Å and from 5.7Å to 3.3Å, respectively. Additionally, the model discrimination is improved, which is demonstrated by an improvement of the enrichment from 5% to 15% and from 13% to 21%, respectively.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ab initio; DEER; EPR; PELDOR; Protein structure; Protein structure prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27129417      PMCID: PMC4912045          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Biol        ISSN: 1047-8477            Impact factor:   2.867


  28 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Dead-time free measurement of dipole-dipole interactions between electron spins.

Authors:  M Pannier; S Veit; A Godt; G Jeschke; H W Spiess
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Structure of Bax: coregulation of dimer formation and intracellular localization.

Authors:  M Suzuki; R J Youle; N Tjandra
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-11-10       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  De novo high-resolution protein structure determination from sparse spin-labeling EPR data.

Authors:  Nathan Alexander; Marco Bortolus; Ahmad Al-Mestarihi; Hassane Mchaourab; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 5.  Control of apoptosis by the BCL-2 protein family: implications for physiology and therapy.

Authors:  Peter E Czabotar; Guillaume Lessene; Andreas Strasser; Jerry M Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  CASP10-BCL::Fold efficiently samples topologies of large proteins.

Authors:  Sten Heinze; Daniel K Putnam; Axel W Fischer; Tim Kohlmann; Brian E Weiner; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-03

Review 7.  Apoptosis in autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  K Eguchi
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.271

Review 8.  Still embedded together binding to membranes regulates Bcl-2 protein interactions.

Authors:  B Leber; J Lin; D W Andrews
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Solvent accessible surface area approximations for rapid and accurate protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Elizabeth Durham; Brent Dorr; Nils Woetzel; René Staritzbichler; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  BCL::MP-fold: folding membrane proteins through assembly of transmembrane helices.

Authors:  Brian E Weiner; Nils Woetzel; Mert Karakaş; Nathan Alexander; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  8 in total

1.  Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax.

Authors:  C Ashley Barnes; Pushpa Mishra; James L Baber; Marie-Paule Strub; Nico Tjandra
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Topology of active, membrane-embedded Bax in the context of a toroidal pore.

Authors:  Stephanie Bleicken; Tufa E Assafa; Carolin Stegmueller; Alice Wittig; Ana J Garcia-Saez; Enrica Bordignon
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 15.828

4.  Rapid Simulation of Unprocessed DEER Decay Data for Protein Fold Prediction.

Authors:  Diego Del Alamo; Maxx H Tessmer; Richard A Stein; Jimmy B Feix; Hassane S Mchaourab; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Structure and Dynamics of Type III Secretion Effector Protein ExoU As determined by SDSL-EPR Spectroscopy in Conjunction with De Novo Protein Folding.

Authors:  Axel W Fischer; David M Anderson; Maxx H Tessmer; Dara W Frank; Jimmy B Feix; Jens Meiler
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-06-27

6.  Predicting Protein Complex Structure from Surface-Induced Dissociation Mass Spectrometry Data.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Sophie R Harvey; Vicki H Wysocki; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 14.553

7.  The contribution of modern EPR to structural biology.

Authors:  Gunnar Jeschke
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2018-04-20

Review 8.  Applications of contact predictions to structural biology.

Authors:  Felix Simkovic; Sergey Ovchinnikov; David Baker; Daniel J Rigden
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.769

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.