Literature DB >> 25581562

CASP10-BCL::Fold efficiently samples topologies of large proteins.

Sten Heinze1, Daniel K Putnam, Axel W Fischer, Tim Kohlmann, Brian E Weiner, Jens Meiler.   

Abstract

During CASP10 in summer 2012, we tested BCL::Fold for prediction of free modeling (FM) and template-based modeling (TBM) targets. BCL::Fold assembles the tertiary structure of a protein from predicted secondary structure elements (SSEs) omitting more flexible loop regions early on. This approach enables the sampling of conformational space for larger proteins with more complex topologies. In preparation of CASP11, we analyzed the quality of CASP10 models throughout the prediction pipeline to understand BCL::Fold's ability to sample the native topology, identify native-like models by scoring and/or clustering approaches, and our ability to add loop regions and side chains to initial SSE-only models. The standout observation is that BCL::Fold sampled topologies with a GDT_TS score > 33% for 12 of 18 and with a topology score > 0.8 for 11 of 18 test cases de novo. Despite the sampling success of BCL::Fold, significant challenges still exist in clustering and loop generation stages of the pipeline. The clustering approach employed for model selection often failed to identify the most native-like assembly of SSEs for further refinement and submission. It was also observed that for some β-strand proteins model refinement failed as β-strands were not properly aligned to form hydrogen bonds removing otherwise accurate models from the pool. Further, BCL::Fold samples frequently non-natural topologies that require loop regions to pass through the center of the protein.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  de novo protein structure prediction; double blind benchmark; knowledge based scoring functions; loop prediction; sheet alignment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25581562      PMCID: PMC5563077          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  47 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure.

Authors:  Adrian A Canutescu; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Ingo Ruczinski; Jerry Tsai; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 6.  Large macromolecular complexes in the Protein Data Bank: a status report.

Authors:  Shuchismita Dutta; Helen M Berman
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Prediction of CASP6 structures using automated Robetta protocols.

Authors:  Dylan Chivian; David E Kim; Lars Malmström; Jack Schonbrun; Carol A Rohl; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

8.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  BCL::MP-fold: folding membrane proteins through assembly of transmembrane helices.

Authors:  Brian E Weiner; Nils Woetzel; Mert Karakaş; Nathan Alexander; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Thomas A Hopf; Lucy J Colwell; Robert Sheridan; Burkhard Rost; Chris Sander; Debora S Marks
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  3 in total

1.  BCL::SAXS: GPU accelerated Debye method for computation of small angle X-ray scattering profiles.

Authors:  Daniel K Putnam; Brian E Weiner; Nils Woetzel; Edward W Lowe; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-07-01

2.  Pushing the size limit of de novo structure ensemble prediction guided by sparse SDSL-EPR restraints to 200 residues: The monomeric and homodimeric forms of BAX.

Authors:  Axel W Fischer; Enrica Bordignon; Stephanie Bleicken; Ana J García-Sáez; Gunnar Jeschke; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  CASP11--An Evaluation of a Modular BCL::Fold-Based Protein Structure Prediction Pipeline.

Authors:  Axel W Fischer; Sten Heinze; Daniel K Putnam; Bian Li; James C Pino; Yan Xia; Carlos F Lopez; Jens Meiler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.