Literature DB >> 18275810

De novo high-resolution protein structure determination from sparse spin-labeling EPR data.

Nathan Alexander1, Marco Bortolus, Ahmad Al-Mestarihi, Hassane Mchaourab, Jens Meiler.   

Abstract

As many key proteins evade crystallization and remain too large for nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy combined with site-directed spin labeling offers an alternative approach for obtaining structural information. Such information must be translated into geometric restraints to be used in computer simulations. Here, distances between spin labels are converted into distance ranges between beta carbons by using a "motion-on-a-cone" model, and a linear-correlation model links spin-label accessibility to the number of neighboring residues. This approach was tested on T4-lysozyme and alphaA-crystallin with the de novo structure prediction algorithm Rosetta. The results demonstrate the feasibility of obtaining highly accurate, atomic-detail models from EPR data by yielding 1.0 A and 2.6 A full-atom models, respectively. Distance restraints between amino acids far apart in sequence but close in space are most valuable for structure determination. The approach can be extended to other experimental techniques such as fluorescence spectroscopy, substituted cysteine accessibility method, or mutational studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18275810      PMCID: PMC2390841          DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2007.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  70 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Rosetta in CASP4: progress in ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  R Bonneau; J Tsai; I Ruczinski; D Chivian; C Rohl; C E Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001

3.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Ingo Ruczinski; Jerry Tsai; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Wrapping the alpha-crystallin domain fold in a chaperone assembly.

Authors:  Robin Stamler; Guido Kappé; Wilbert Boelens; Christine Slingsby
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  The determination of pair distance distributions by pulsed ESR using Tikhonov regularization.

Authors:  Yun-Wei Chiang; Peter P Borbat; Jack H Freed
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 8.  100,000 protein structures for the biologist.

Authors:  A Sali
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1998-12

9.  Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction.

Authors:  R L Dunbrack; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-03-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Determination of the distance between two spin labels attached to a macromolecule.

Authors:  M D Rabenstein; Y K Shin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  68 in total

Review 1.  Toward the fourth dimension of membrane protein structure: insight into dynamics from spin-labeling EPR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Hassane S McHaourab; P Ryan Steed; Kelli Kazmier
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  EM-fold: de novo atomic-detail protein structure determination from medium-resolution density maps.

Authors:  Steffen Lindert; Nathan Alexander; Nils Wötzel; Mert Karakaş; Phoebe L Stewart; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Crystal structures of truncated alphaA and alphaB crystallins reveal structural mechanisms of polydispersity important for eye lens function.

Authors:  Arthur Laganowsky; Justin L P Benesch; Meytal Landau; Linlin Ding; Michael R Sawaya; Duilio Cascio; Qingling Huang; Carol V Robinson; Joseph Horwitz; David Eisenberg
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Increased sensitivity and extended range of distance measurements in spin-labeled membrane proteins: Q-band double electron-electron resonance and nanoscale bilayers.

Authors:  Ping Zou; Hassane S McHaourab
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Structure, dynamics, and substrate-induced conformational changes of the multidrug transporter EmrE in liposomes.

Authors:  Sepan T Amadi; Hanane A Koteiche; Sanjay Mishra; Hassane S McHaourab
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Algorithm for selection of optimized EPR distance restraints for de novo protein structure determination.

Authors:  Kelli Kazmier; Nathan S Alexander; Jens Meiler; Hassane S McHaourab
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.867

7.  Characterization of the Domain Orientations of E. coli 5'-Nucleotidase by Fitting an Ensemble of Conformers to DEER Distance Distributions.

Authors:  Ulrike Krug; Nathan S Alexander; Richard A Stein; Antje Keim; Hassane S Mchaourab; Norbert Sträter; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 8.  Constraint methods that accelerate free-energy simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Justin L MacCallum; Evangelos A Coutsias; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Solvent accessible surface area approximations for rapid and accurate protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Elizabeth Durham; Brent Dorr; Nils Woetzel; René Staritzbichler; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Conformation of receptor-bound visual arrestin.

Authors:  Miyeon Kim; Sergey A Vishnivetskiy; Ned Van Eps; Nathan S Alexander; Whitney M Cleghorn; Xuanzhi Zhan; Susan M Hanson; Takefumi Morizumi; Oliver P Ernst; Jens Meiler; Vsevolod V Gurevich; Wayne L Hubbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.