Literature DB >> 33977487

A Facile Method to Engineer Mutant Kras Alleles in an Isogenic Cell Background.

Konstantin Budagyan1, Jonathan Chernoff2.   

Abstract

Oncogenic KRAS mutations are common in colorectal cancer (CRC), found in ~50% of tumors, and are associated with poor prognosis and resistance to therapy. There is substantial diversity of KRAS mutations observed in CRC. Importantly, emerging clinical and experimental analysis of relatively common KRAS mutations at amino acids G12, G13, A146, and Q61 suggest that each mutation differently influences the clinical properties of a disease and response to therapy. Although clinical evidence suggests biological differences between mutant KRAS alleles, these differences and the mechanisms underlying them are not well understood, and further exploration of allele-specific differences may provide evidence for individualized therapeutics. One approach to study allelic variation involves the use of isogenic cell lines that express different endogenous KRAS mutants. Here we developed an assay using fluorescent co-selection for CRISPR-driven gene editing to generate various Kras mutations in an isogenic murine colon epithelial cell line background. This assay involves generation of a cell line stably expressing Cas9 linked to BFP and simultaneous introduction of single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) to two different gene loci resulting in double-editing events. Single-stranded donor oligonucleotides are introduced for a GFP gene and a Kras mutant allele of our choice as templates for homologous recombination (HDR). Cells that successfully undergo HDR are GFP-positive and have a higher probability of containing the desired Kras mutation. Therefore, selection for GFP-positive cells allows us to identify those with phenotypically silent Kras edits. Ultimately, this method allows us to toggle between different mutant alleles and preserve the wild-type allele while maintaining an isogenic background.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Co-selection; Epithelial cells; Gene editing; Isogenic cells; KRAS; Signal transduction; Small G proteins

Year:  2021        PMID: 33977487     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1190-6_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  18 in total

Review 1.  KRAS Alleles: The Devil Is in the Detail.

Authors:  Kevin M Haigis
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-09-12

2.  Marker-free coselection for CRISPR-driven genome editing in human cells.

Authors:  Daniel Agudelo; Alexis Duringer; Lusiné Bozoyan; Caroline C Huard; Sophie Carter; Jeremy Loehr; Dafni Synodinou; Mathieu Drouin; Jayme Salsman; Graham Dellaire; Josée Laganière; Yannick Doyon
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Treatment of fractures with Hirschhorn compression plates.

Authors:  J P Hickcox
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1970-01-15       Impact factor: 1.936

4.  K-ras codon 12 mutation induces higher level of resistance to apoptosis and predisposition to anchorage-independent growth than codon 13 mutation or proto-oncogene overexpression.

Authors:  S Guerrero; I Casanova; L Farré; A Mazo; G Capellà; R Mangues
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  K-ras Asp12 mutant neither interacts with Raf, nor signals through Erk and is less tumorigenic than K-ras Val12.

Authors:  María Virtudes Céspedes; Francesc Josep Sancho; Silvia Guerrero; Matilde Parreño; Isolda Casanova; Miguel Angel Pavón; Eugenio Marcuello; Manuel Trias; Marta Cascante; Gabriel Capellà; Ramon Mangues
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Activating K-Ras mutations outwith 'hotspot' codons in sporadic colorectal tumours - implications for personalised cancer medicine.

Authors:  G Smith; R Bounds; H Wolf; R J C Steele; F A Carey; C R Wolf
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Dominik Paquet; Dylan Kwart; Antonia Chen; Andrew Sproul; Samson Jacob; Shaun Teo; Kimberly Moore Olsen; Andrew Gregg; Scott Noggle; Marc Tessier-Lavigne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Co-incident insertion enables high efficiency genome engineering in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Brian R Shy; Matthew S MacDougall; Ryan Clarke; Bradley J Merrill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Comprehensive characterization of RAS mutations in colon and rectal cancers in old and young patients.

Authors:  Ilya G Serebriiskii; Caitlin Connelly; Garrett Frampton; Justin Newberg; Matthew Cooke; Vince Miller; Siraj Ali; Jeffrey S Ross; Elizabeth Handorf; Sanjeevani Arora; Christopher Lieu; Erica A Golemis; Joshua E Meyer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  A Universal Surrogate Reporter for Efficient Enrichment of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Homology-Directed Repair in Mammalian Cells.

Authors:  Nana Yan; Yongsen Sun; Yuanyuan Fang; Jingrong Deng; Lu Mu; Kun Xu; Joe S Mymryk; Zhiying Zhang
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 8.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.