Literature DB >> 26053390

Regulation of Gene Editing Activity Directed by Single-Stranded Oligonucleotides and CRISPR/Cas9 Systems.

Pawel Bialk1, Natalia Rivera-Torres2, Bryan Strouse2, Eric B Kmiec2.   

Abstract

Single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides (ssODNs) can direct the repair of a single base mutation in human genes. While the regulation of this gene editing reaction has been partially elucidated, the low frequency with which repair occurs has hampered development toward clinical application. In this work a CRISPR/Cas9 complex is employed to induce double strand DNA breakage at specific sites surrounding the nucleotide designated for exchange. The result is a significant elevation in ssODN-directed gene repair, validated by a phenotypic readout. By analysing reaction parameters, we have uncovered restrictions on gene editing activity involving CRISPR/Cas9 complexes. First, ssODNs that hybridize to the non-transcribed strand direct a higher level of gene repair than those that hybridize to the transcribed strand. Second, cleavage must be proximal to the targeted mutant base to enable higher levels of gene editing. Third, DNA cleavage enables a higher level of gene editing activity as compared to single-stranded DNA nicks, created by modified Cas9 (Nickases). Fourth, we calculated the hybridization potential and free energy levels of ssODNs that are complementary to the guide RNA sequences of CRISPRs used in this study. We find a correlation between free energy potential and the capacity of single-stranded oligonucleotides to inhibit specific DNA cleavage activity, thereby indirectly reducing gene editing activity. Our data provide novel information that might be taken into consideration in the design and usage of CRISPR/Cas9 systems with ssODNs for gene editing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26053390      PMCID: PMC4459703          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  48 in total

1.  Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Patrick D Hsu; Chie-Yu Lin; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Silvana Konermann; Alexandro E Trevino; David A Scott; Azusa Inoue; Shogo Matoba; Yi Zhang; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease.

Authors:  Seung Woo Cho; Sojung Kim; Jong Min Kim; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Homology-directed repair of DNA nicks via pathways distinct from canonical double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Luther Davis; Nancy Maizels
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Patrick D Hsu; Jason Wright; Vineeta Agarwala; David A Scott; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  A TALEN genome-editing system for generating human stem cell-based disease models.

Authors:  Qiurong Ding; Youn-Kyoung Lee; Esperance A K Schaefer; Derek T Peters; Adrian Veres; Kevin Kim; Nicolas Kuperwasser; Daniel L Motola; Torsten B Meissner; William T Hendriks; Marta Trevisan; Rajat M Gupta; Annie Moisan; Eric Banks; Max Friesen; Robert T Schinzel; Fang Xia; Alexander Tang; Yulei Xia; Emmanuel Figueroa; Amy Wann; Tim Ahfeldt; Laurence Daheron; Feng Zhang; Lee L Rubin; Lee F Peng; Raymond T Chung; Kiran Musunuru; Chad A Cowan
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; Luhan Yang; Kevin M Esvelt; John Aach; Marc Guell; James E DiCarlo; Julie E Norville; George M Church
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Optimization of scarless human stem cell genome editing.

Authors:  Luhan Yang; Marc Guell; Susan Byrne; Joyce L Yang; Alejandro De Los Angeles; Prashant Mali; John Aach; Caroline Kim-Kiselak; Adrian W Briggs; Xavier Rios; Po-Yi Huang; George Daley; George Church
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Combinatorial gene editing in mammalian cells using ssODNs and TALENs.

Authors:  Bryan Strouse; Pawel Bialk; Rohina A Niamat; Natalia Rivera-Torres; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The position of DNA cleavage by TALENs and cell synchronization influences the frequency of gene editing directed by single-stranded oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Natalia Rivera-Torres; Bryan Strouse; Pawel Bialk; Rohina A Niamat; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems.

Authors:  Wenyan Jiang; David Bikard; David Cox; Feng Zhang; Luciano A Marraffini
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  40 in total

1.  Precise Correction of Disease Mutations in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived From Patients With Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Soeren Turan; Alfonso P Farruggio; Waracharee Srifa; John W Day; Michele P Calos
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 2.  A CRISPR Path to Engineering New Genetic Mouse Models for Cardiovascular Research.

Authors:  Joseph M Miano; Qiuyu Martin Zhu; Charles J Lowenstein
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 8.311

3.  Precise and efficient scarless genome editing in stem cells using CORRECT.

Authors:  Dylan Kwart; Dominik Paquet; Shaun Teo; Marc Tessier-Lavigne
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Oligonucleotide-Mediated Genome Editing Provides Precision and Function to Engineered Nucleases and Antibiotics in Plants.

Authors:  Noel J Sauer; Javier Narváez-Vásquez; Jerry Mozoruk; Ryan B Miller; Zachary J Warburg; Melody J Woodward; Yohannes A Mihiret; Tracey A Lincoln; Rosa E Segami; Steven L Sanders; Keith A Walker; Peter R Beetham; Christian R Schöpke; Greg F W Gocal
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Screening the Toxoplasma kinome with high-throughput tagging identifies a regulator of invasion and egress.

Authors:  Tyler A Smith; Gabriella S Lopez-Perez; Alice L Herneisen; Emily Shortt; Sebastian Lourido
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 30.964

6.  Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Dominik Paquet; Dylan Kwart; Antonia Chen; Andrew Sproul; Samson Jacob; Shaun Teo; Kimberly Moore Olsen; Andrew Gregg; Scott Noggle; Marc Tessier-Lavigne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Comparative analysis of lipid-mediated CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing techniques.

Authors:  Kelsey P Ringer; Mark G Roth; Mitchell S Garey; Ted B Piorczynski; Arminda Suli; Jason M Hansen; Jonathan K Alder
Journal:  Cell Biol Int       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Combining Single Strand Oligodeoxynucleotides and CRISPR/Cas9 to Correct Gene Mutations in β-Thalassemia-induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Xiaohua Niu; Wenyin He; Bing Song; Zhanhui Ou; Di Fan; Yuchang Chen; Yong Fan; Xiaofang Sun
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Genome-wide Mapping of Off-Target Events in Single-Stranded Oligodeoxynucleotide-Mediated Gene Repair Experiments.

Authors:  Sarah Radecke; Klaus Schwarz; Frank Radecke
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 10.  Resources for the design of CRISPR gene editing experiments.

Authors:  Daniel B Graham; David E Root
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.