Literature DB >> 27118038

Analyzing biomechanical parameters of the cornea with glaucoma severity in open-angle glaucoma.

Karin R Pillunat1, Cosima Hermann2, Eberhard Spoerl2, Lutz E Pillunat2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose was to investigate a possible association of corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) with open-angle glaucoma and the severity of disease.
METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study we recruited 86 open-angle glaucoma patients, 16 patients with ocular hypertension (OHT,) and 44 age-matched controls. Each participant had a complete glaucoma workup including measurements with the Ocular Response Analyzer and computerized perimetry with the Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard program. Visual field damage was based on mean deviation (MD) and considered as early glaucomatous with a MD > - 6 dB, moderate glaucomatous between -6 and -12 dB and advanced glaucomatous < -12 dB. The association between ORA parameters, glaucoma, and disease severity was evaluated using univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant correlation between the biomechanical parameters and intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, axial length, and age. On average, glaucoma patients had the lowest adjusted CH (8.96 ± 1.43 mmHg) and CRF (9.07 ± 1.93 mmHg) values in comparison to OHT patients (CH: 10.2 ± 1.5 mmHg; CRF: 10.6 ± 2.1 mmHg) and controls (CH: 9.7 ± 1.4 mmHg; CRF: 10.2 ± 1.9 mmHg). This difference was statistically significant (CH: p = 0.003; CRF: p = 0.008). There was also a statistically significant difference in adjusted CH (p = 0.001) and CRF (p = 0.004) values between the controls and the visual field groups, with the lowest values being in the most advanced group.
CONCLUSIONS: Before interpreting corneal biomechanical parameters, it seems important to adjust the measured data for their underlying influencing factors. Glaucoma patients with lower adjusted CH and CRF probably have more advanced disease and should, therefore, be treated more aggressively and monitored more carefully and frequently.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal hysteresis; Corneal resistance factor; Ocular response analyzer; Open-angle glaucoma; Visual field severity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27118038     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-016-3365-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  40 in total

1.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  David A Luce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Corneal hysteresis with intraocular pressure of a wide range: a test on porcine eyes.

Authors:  Chen Tao; Zhaolong Han; Yong Sun; Chuanqing Zhou; Cynthia Roberts; Dai Zhou; Qiushi Ren
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Lower corneal hysteresis is associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression.

Authors:  Carlos V Gustavo De Moraes; Victoria Hill; Celso Tello; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Sunil Shah; Mohammad Laiquzzaman; Sanjay Mantry; Ian Cunliffe
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 6.  An evidence-based review of prognostic factors for glaucomatous visual field progression.

Authors:  Paul J Ernest; Jan S Schouten; Henny J Beckers; Fred Hendrikse; Martin H Prins; Carroll A Webers
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Aimee Teo Broman; Nathan G Congdon; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Harry A Quigley
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2007 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael Sullivan-Mee; Shavon C Billingsley; Amita D Patel; Kathy D Halverson; Brooks R Alldredge; Clifford Qualls
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Ghee Soon Ang; Frank Bochmann; John Townend; Augusto Azuara-Blanco
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2008 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Biomechanics of the cornea evaluated by spectral analysis of waveforms from ocular response analyzer and Corvis-ST.

Authors:  Sushma Tejwani; Rohit Shetty; Mathew Kurien; Shoruba Dinakaran; Arkasubhra Ghosh; Abhijit Sinha Roy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  The biomechanical properties of the cornea of patients with glaucoma treated with anti-glaucoma topical medications.

Authors:  Chong-Da Chen; Hui Chen; Lin Miao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Response to the comment on "The biomechanical properties of the cornea of patients with glaucoma treated with anti-glaucoma topical medication".

Authors:  Karin R Pillunat; Cosima Hermann; Eberhard Spoerl; Lutz E Pillunat
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  The importance of assessing corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma patients care - a review.

Authors:  Dana Dascalescu; Catalina Corbu; Potop Vasile; Raluca Iancu; Miruna Cristea; Catalina Ionescu; Ciuluvica Radu Constantin; Liliana Voinea
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

4.  2-D Ultrasonic Array-Based Optical Coherence Elastography.

Authors:  Haochen Kang; Xuejun Qian; Ruimin Chen; Robert Wodnicki; Yizhe Sun; Runze Li; Yan Li; K Kirk Shung; Zhongping Chen; Qifa Zhou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  The association between serum uric acid and glaucoma severity in primary angle closure glaucoma: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Shengjie Li; Mingxi Shao; Binghua Tang; Aiping Zhang; Wenjun Cao; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-10

6.  Relationship of corneal hysteresis and optic nerve parameters in healthy myopic subjects.

Authors:  Kunliang Qiu; Xuehui Lu; Riping Zhang; Geng Wang; Mingzhi Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  COL11A1 Polymorphisms Are Associated with Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Severity.

Authors:  Yani Wan; Shengjie Li; Yanting Gao; Li Tang; Wenjun Cao; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-27       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST.

Authors:  Lisa Ramm; Robert Herber; Eberhard Spoerl; Frederik Raiskup; Lutz E Pillunat; Naim Terai
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Association between coagulation function and patients with primary angle closure glaucoma: a 5-year retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Shengjie Li; Yanting Gao; Mingxi Shao; Binghua Tang; Wenjun Cao; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The diagnostic value of white blood cell, neutrophil, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in patients with primary angle closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Shengjie Li; Wenjun Cao; Jianping Han; Binghua Tang; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.