| Literature DB >> 27115488 |
John A Bowden1, Theresa M Cantu2, Robert W Chapman3, Stephen E Somerville2, Matthew P Guillette2, Hannes Botha4,5, Andre Hoffman4, Wilmien J Luus-Powell5, Willem J Smit5, Jeffrey Lebepe5, Jan Myburgh6, Danny Govender6,7, Jonathan Tucker3, Ashley S P Boggs1, Louis J Guillette2,6.
Abstract
One of the largest river systems in South Africa, the Olifants River, has experienced significant changes in water quality due to anthropogenic activities. Since 2005, there have been various "outbreaks" of the inflammatory disease pansteatitis in several vertebrate species. Large-scale pansteatitis-related mortality events have decimated the crocodile population at Lake Loskop and decreased the population at Kruger National Park. Most pansteatitis-related diagnoses within the region are conducted post-mortem by either gross pathology or histology. The application of a non-lethal approach to assess the prevalence and pervasiveness of pansteatitis in the Olifants River region would be of great importance for the development of a management plan for this disease. In this study, several plasma-based biomarkers accurately classified pansteatitis in Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) collected from Lake Loskop using a commercially available benchtop blood chemistry analyzer combined with data interpretation via artificial neural network analysis. According to the model, four blood chemistry parameters (calcium, sodium, total protein and albumin), in combination with total length, diagnose pansteatitis to a predictive accuracy of 92 percent. In addition, several morphometric traits (total length, age, weight) were also associated with pansteatitis. On-going research will focus on further evaluating the use of blood chemistry to classify pansteatitis across different species, trophic levels, and within different sites along the Olifants River.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27115488 PMCID: PMC4846142 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153874
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Visual examination of healthy (top) and pansteatitis-affected tilapia (bottom), enhanced images on the right.
The examples shown are male tilapia. Note the lesions on the diseased tilapia (orange lesions, bottom right photo).
Mean and SEM values for healthy and diseased tilapia obtained using the blood chemistry analyzer.
| AST | 75 ± 22 | 64 ± 18 | 115 ± 47 | 61 ± 15 | 95 ± 26 | 62 ± 11 |
| CK | 1258 ± 500 | 2123 ± 450 | 2203 ± 680 | 2079 ± 420 | 1832 ± 440 | 2100 ± 300 |
| GLU | 43 ± 7 | 32 ± 2 | 34 ± 2 | 36 ± 4 | 38 ± 4 | 34 ± 2 |
| Ca2+ | 14.5 ± 0.2 | 12.2 ± 0.3 | 15.9 ± 0.6 | 14.8 ± 0.7 | 15.2 ± 0.3 | 13.6 ± 0.5 |
| PHOS | 8.0 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.3 | 7.6 ± 0.5 | 6.4 ± 0.4 | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 5.8 ± 0.3 |
| TP | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 4.0 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 |
| ALB | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 |
| GLOB | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.0 |
| K+ | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 4.1 ± 0.2 | 4.4 ± 0.3 | 4.1 ± 0.1 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 4.1 ± 0.1 |
| Na+ | 172 ± 2 | 162 ± 3 | 170 ± 2 | 166 ± 3 | 171 ± 1 | 164 ± 2 |
Values provided are the mean ± SEM.
* Indicates that the CK value for sample 8683 was not included in mean due to the lack of a calculated CK value obtained using the blood chemistry analyzer.
Examination of blood chemistry parameters and morphometric traits using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests.
| Healthy M vs. Diseased M | Healthy F vs. Diseased F | Healthy vs. Diseased (Combined Sex) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AST | χ2 = 0.1390 | No significant difference | ||
| CK | χ2 = 0.3706 | No significant difference | ||
| GLU | χ2 = 0.3517 | No significant difference | ||
| Ca2+ | χ2 = 0.1016 | Healthy M had higher Ca2+ | ||
| PHOS | p = 0.0815 | Healthy M had higher PHOS | ||
| TP | Healthy had higher TP | |||
| ALB | Healthy had higher ALB | |||
| GLOB | Healthy had higher GLOB | |||
| K+ | χ2 = 0.2912 | No significant difference | ||
| Na+ | Healthy had higher Na+ | |||
| Age | Diseased were older | |||
| Total Length | Diseased were longer | |||
| Weight | χ2 = 0.0608 | Diseased M were heavier |
Significance was determined (in bold) by calculated p- and χ2-values shown (significance < 0.05). Abbreviations for each blood chemistry parameters: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bile acids (BA), creatine kinase (CK), uric acid (UA), glucose (GLU), inorganic phosphorous (PHOS), calcium (Ca2+), total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), globulin (GLOB), potassium (K+), and sodium (Na+). BA and UA were not examined.
Fig 2Sensitivities plot for assessing which variables were most important for classifying pansteatitis.
Error values are shown as standard deviation of the mean.
Fig 3(A) ROC curve using all the blood chemistry parameters with age and total length included. The area under the curve was 0.85 with a standard error of 0.02. (B) ROC curve using the four most important blood parameters: Ca, Na, TP and ALB with total length. The area under the curve was 0.92 with a standard error of 0.06.
Fig 4Surface plots for the four predictive parameters.
A) Ca2+ (mg/dL), B) Na+ (mmol/L), C) ALB (g/dL), and D) TP (g/dL), in relation to vet score and total length (while keeping the other three parameters clamped).