Michael C Liebensteiner1, Franz Birkfellner2, Martina Deibl3, Christian Haid1, Martin Krismer1, Dietmar Dammerer4. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria. 2. Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital St. Johann, Bahnhofstraße 14, 6380, St. Johann in Tirol, Austria. 3. Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria. 4. Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria. dietmar.dammerer@tirol-kliniken.at.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Studies on driving safety after lumbar spinal procedures are rare. Previous studies solely reported on a) driving reaction time (DRT) after lumbar nerve root blocks, b) DRT after discectomy and c) preliminary DRT findings after lumbar fusion. METHODS: DRT was assessed with a driving simulator as described before. Measurements were done one day before surgery (preop DRT), one week after surgery (postop1 DRT), three months (postop2 DRT) and one year postoperatively (postop3 DRT). Back pain was determined with visual analogue scales (VAS) on all four occasions. Additionally, we monitored each patient's pre-operative driving frequency and intake of analgesics. For statistical analysis we used an ANOVA for repeated measurements. RESULTS: Thirt eight of 51 patients completed all measurements (17 monosegmental fusion, 14 polysegmental fusion, seven other lumbar fusion procedures). The longitudinal changes in DRT showed overall significance (p = 0.013). Post-hoc tests determined p = 0.035 for the DRT-increase from pre- to postoperative. We did not determine a significant statistical effect for the type of surgery (p = 0.581) or patient age (p = 0.134). A tendency towards statistical significance was ascertained for the influence of patients' driving frequency on DRT (p = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: We found increased DRT at the time of discharge after lumbar spinal fusion and therefore recommend driving abstinence for the time thereafter. Based on our findings it appears safe to return to driving at 3 months postoperative.
PURPOSE: Studies on driving safety after lumbar spinal procedures are rare. Previous studies solely reported on a) driving reaction time (DRT) after lumbar nerve root blocks, b) DRT after discectomy and c) preliminary DRT findings after lumbar fusion. METHODS: DRT was assessed with a driving simulator as described before. Measurements were done one day before surgery (preop DRT), one week after surgery (postop1 DRT), three months (postop2 DRT) and one year postoperatively (postop3 DRT). Back pain was determined with visual analogue scales (VAS) on all four occasions. Additionally, we monitored each patient's pre-operative driving frequency and intake of analgesics. For statistical analysis we used an ANOVA for repeated measurements. RESULTS: Thirt eight of 51 patients completed all measurements (17 monosegmental fusion, 14 polysegmental fusion, seven other lumbar fusion procedures). The longitudinal changes in DRT showed overall significance (p = 0.013). Post-hoc tests determined p = 0.035 for the DRT-increase from pre- to postoperative. We did not determine a significant statistical effect for the type of surgery (p = 0.581) or patient age (p = 0.134). A tendency towards statistical significance was ascertained for the influence of patients' driving frequency on DRT (p = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: We found increased DRT at the time of discharge after lumbar spinal fusion and therefore recommend driving abstinence for the time thereafter. Based on our findings it appears safe to return to driving at 3 months postoperative.
Authors: Carlos J Marques; Jan Cabri; João Barreiros; Ana I Carita; Christian Friesecke; Jochen F Loehr Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Michael C Liebensteiner; Michaela Kern; Christian Haid; Conrad Kobel; David Niederseer; Martin Krismer Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Sandy B Ganz; Audrey Zucker Levin; Margaret G Peterson; Chitranjan S Ranawat Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.176