Literature DB >> 27100284

CEST-MRI detects metabolite levels altered by breast cancer cell aggressiveness and chemotherapy response.

Kannie W Y Chan1,2, Lu Jiang3, Menglin Cheng3, Jannie P Wijnen3,4, Guanshu Liu1,2, Peng Huang5,6, Peter C M van Zijl1,2, Michael T McMahon1,2, Kristine Glunde3,6.   

Abstract

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is an MRI contrast mechanism that detects the exchange of protons from distinct hydroxyl, amine, and amide groups to tissue water through the transfer of signal loss, with repeated exchange enhancing their effective signal. We applied CEST to detect systematically 15 common cellular metabolites in a panel of differentially aggressive human breast cancer cell lines. The highest CEST contrast was generated by creatine, myo-inositol, glutamate, and glycerophosphocholine, whose cellular concentrations decreased with increasing breast cancer aggressiveness. These decreased metabolite concentrations resulted in turn in a decreased CEST profile with increasing breast cancer aggressiveness in water-soluble extracts of breast cell lines. Treatment of both breast cancer cell lines with the chemotherapy drug doxorubicin resulted in increased metabolic CEST profiles, which correlated with significant increases in creatine, phosphocreatine, and glycerophosphocholine. CEST can detect breast cancer aggressiveness and response to chemotherapy in water-soluble extracts of breast cell lines. The presented results help shed light on possible contributions from CEST-active metabolites to the CEST contrast produced by breast cancers. The metabolic CEST profile may improve detection sensitivity over conventional MRS, and may have the potential to assess breast cancer aggressiveness and response to chemotherapy non-invasively using MRI if specialized metabolic CEST profile detection can be realized in vivo.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CEST; breast cancer; cells; chemotherapy; metabolism; metabolites

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27100284      PMCID: PMC4873340          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  56 in total

1.  On the origin of cancer cells.

Authors:  O WARBURG
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A Dean Sherry; Mark Woods
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

3.  Quantification of metabolites in breast cancer patients with different clinical prognosis using HR MAS MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Beathe Sitter; Tone F Bathen; Trond E Singstad; Hans E Fjøsne; Steinar Lundgren; Jostein Halgunset; Ingrid S Gribbestad
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  High-throughput screening of chemical exchange saturation transfer MR contrast agents.

Authors:  Guanshu Liu; Assaf A Gilad; Jeff W M Bulte; Peter C M van Zijl; Michael T McMahon
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Measuring in vivo tumor pHe with CEST-FISP MRI.

Authors:  Vipul R Sheth; Yuguo Li; Liu Qi Chen; Christine M Howison; Chris A Flask; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't?

Authors:  Peter C M van Zijl; Nirbhay N Yadav
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis?

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Amide proton transfer imaging of the breast at 3 T: establishing reproducibility and possible feasibility assessing chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Adrienne N Dula; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard D Dortch; Blake E Dewey; Jennifer G Whisenant; Gregory D Ayers; Thomas E Yankeelov; Seth A Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Natural D-glucose as a biodegradable MRI contrast agent for detecting cancer.

Authors:  Kannie W Y Chan; Michael T McMahon; Yoshinori Kato; Guanshu Liu; Jeff W M Bulte; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Dmitri Artemov; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation.

Authors:  Ralph J DeBerardinis; Julian J Lum; Georgia Hatzivassiliou; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 27.287

View more
  25 in total

1.  Free-base porphyrins as CEST MRI contrast agents with highly upfield shifted labile protons.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Zhang; Yaping Yuan; Sha Li; Qingbin Zeng; Qianni Guo; Na Liu; Minghui Yang; Yunhuang Yang; Maili Liu; Michael T McMahon; Xin Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Cytotoxicity of doxrubicin loaded single-walled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Ayhan Ünlü; Mehdi Meran; Bircan Dinc; Nilgün Karatepe; Muhammet Bektaş; F Seniha Güner
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 3.  Focus on the glycerophosphocholine pathway in choline phospholipid metabolism of cancer.

Authors:  Kanchan Sonkar; Vinay Ayyappan; Caitlin M Tressler; Oluwatobi Adelaja; Ruoqing Cai; Menglin Cheng; Kristine Glunde
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Balanced Steady-State Free Precession (bSSFP) from an effective field perspective: Application to the detection of chemical exchange (bSSFPX).

Authors:  Shu Zhang; Zheng Liu; Aaron Grant; Jochen Keupp; Robert E Lenkinski; Elena Vinogradov
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  CEST-Dixon for human breast lesion characterization at 3 T: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Shu Zhang; Stephen Seiler; Xinzeng Wang; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Jochen Keupp; Emily E Knippa; Robert E Lenkinski; Elena Vinogradov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Z-spectrum appearance and interpretation in the presence of fat: Influence of acquisition parameters.

Authors:  Shu Zhang; Jochen Keupp; Xinzeng Wang; Ivan Dimitrov; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Robert E Lenkinski; Elena Vinogradov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Magnetization Transfer Contrast and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI. Features and analysis of the field-dependent saturation spectrum.

Authors:  Peter C M van Zijl; Wilfred W Lam; Jiadi Xu; Linda Knutsson; Greg J Stanisz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Two decades of dendrimers as versatile MRI agents: a tale with and without metals.

Authors:  Michael T McMahon; Jeff W M Bulte
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-09-11

9.  Lyn regulates creatine uptake in an imatinib-resistant CML cell line.

Authors:  Denis O Okumu; Lucas J Aponte-Collazo; Brian J Dewar; Nathan J Cox; Michael P East; Katherine Tech; Ian M McDonald; Andrey P Tikunov; Ekhson Holmuhamedov; Jeffrey M Macdonald; Lee M Graves
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.770

10.  GlucoCEST MRI for the Evaluation Response to Chemotherapeutic and Metabolic Treatments in a Murine Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Comparison with[18F]F-FDG-PET.

Authors:  Martina Capozza; Annasofia Anemone; Chetan Dhakan; Melania Della Peruta; Martina Bracesco; Sara Zullino; Daisy Villano; Enzo Terreno; Dario Livio Longo; Silvio Aime
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.