Literature DB >> 29417391

Teaching Responsible Research and Innovation: A Phronetic Perspective.

Niels Mejlgaard1, Malene Vinther Christensen2, Roger Strand3, Ivan Buljan4, Mar Carrió5, Marta Cayetano I Giralt6, Erich Griessler7, Alexander Lang7, Ana Marušić4, Gema Revuelta8, Gemma Rodríguez5, Núria Saladié8, Milena Wuketich7.   

Abstract

Across the European research area and beyond, efforts are being mobilized to align research and innovation processes and products with societal values and needs, and to create mechanisms for inclusive priority setting and knowledge production. A central concern is how to foster a culture of "Responsible Research and Innovation" (RRI) among scientists and engineers. This paper focuses on RRI teaching at higher education institutions. On the basis of interviews and reviews of academic and policy documents, it highlights the generic aspects of teaching aimed at invoking a sense of care and societal obligation, and provides a set of exemplary cases of RRI-related teaching. It argues that the Aristotelian concept of phronesis can capture core properties of the objectives of RRI-related teaching activities. Teaching should nurture the students' capacity in terms of practical wisdom, practical ethics, or administrative ability in order to enable them to act virtuously and responsibly in contexts which are often characterized by uncertainty, contention, and controversy.

Keywords:  Phronesis; RRI teaching; Responsible Research and Innovation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29417391     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-018-0029-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  8 in total

1.  Science's new social contract with society.

Authors:  M Gibbons
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The Socratic method in teaching medical ethics: potentials and limitations.

Authors:  D Birnbacher
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  1999

Review 3.  Problem based learning.

Authors:  Diana F Wood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-08

4.  Phronesis as an ideal in professional medical ethics: some preliminary positionings and problematics.

Authors:  Kristján Kristjánsson
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2015-10

5.  Matters of care in technoscience: assembling neglected things. .

Authors:  Maria Puig de la Bellacasa
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.885

Review 6.  Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Mirjam Burget; Emanuele Bardone; Margus Pedaste
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.

Authors:  Barbara E Ribeiro; Robert D J Smith; Kate Millar
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Conversations About Responsible Nanoresearch.

Authors:  Kamilla Lein Kjølberg; Roger Strand
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 0.917

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Responsible research and innovation training programs: implementation and evaluation of the HEIRRI project.

Authors:  Ružica Tokalić; Ivan Buljan; Niels Mejlgaard; Mar Carrió; Alexander Lang; Gema Revuelta; Ana Marušić
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2021-11-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.