Literature DB >> 28900898

Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.

Wessel Reijers1, David Wright2, Philip Brey3, Karsten Weber4, Rowena Rodrigues2, Declan O'Sullivan5, Bert Gordijn6.   

Abstract

This paper provides a systematic literature review, analysis and discussion of methods that are proposed to practise ethics in research and innovation (R&I). Ethical considerations concerning the impacts of R&I are increasingly important, due to the quickening pace of technological innovation and the ubiquitous use of the outcomes of R&I processes in society. For this reason, several methods for practising ethics have been developed in different fields of R&I. The paper first of all presents a systematic search of academic sources that present and discuss such methods. Secondly, it provides a categorisation of these methods according to three main kinds: (1) ex ante methods, dealing with emerging technologies, (2) intra methods, dealing with technology design, and (3) ex post methods, dealing with ethical analysis of existing technologies. Thirdly, it discusses the methods by considering problems in the way they deal with the uncertainty of technological change, ethical technology design, the identification, analysis and resolving of ethical impacts of technologies and stakeholder participation. The results and discussion of our literature review are valuable for gaining an overview of the state of the art and serve as an outline of a future research agenda of methods for practising ethics in R&I.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethical impact assessment; Ethics assessment; Ethics of technology; Practising ethics; Research and innovation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28900898     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9961-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  50 in total

1.  The application of ethics to engineering and the engineer's moral responsibility: perspectives for a research agenda.

Authors:  A Grunwald
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The Just War Theory and the ethical governance of research.

Authors:  Ineke Malsch
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Ethics in Canadian health technology assessment: a descriptive review.

Authors:  Deirdre DeJean; Mita Giacomini; Lisa Schwartz; Fiona A Miller
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Julia Abelson; Dorina Simeonov; Francois-Pierre Gauvin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: a proposed framework.

Authors:  Amanda Burls; Lorraine Caron; Ghislaine Cleret de Langavant; Wybo Dondorp; Christa Harstall; Ela Pathak-Sen; Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Ethical assessment of life-prolonging treatment.

Authors:  Eva C Winkler; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Georg Marckmann
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Improving ethics analysis in health technology assessment.

Authors:  Katherine Duthie; Kenneth Bond
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Standardising Responsibility? The Significance of Interstitial Spaces.

Authors:  Fern Wickson; Ellen-Marie Forsberg
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment.

Authors:  Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  The four principles: can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making?

Authors:  Katie Page
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review.

Authors:  Mirjam Schuijff; Anne M Dijkstra
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  AMICAI: A Method Based on Risk Analysis to Integrate Responsible Research and Innovation into the Work of Research and Innovation Practitioners.

Authors:  Christopher Brandl; Matthias Wille; Jochen Nelles; Peter Rasche; Katharina Schäfer; Frank O Flemisch; Martin Frenz; Verena Nitsch; Alexander Mertens
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  The anatomy of electronic patient record ethics: a framework to guide design, development, implementation, and use.

Authors:  Tim Jacquemard; Colin P Doherty; Mary B Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 4.  Examining how Ethics in Relation to Health Technology is Described in the Research Literature: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Emilie Steerling; Rebecca Houston; Luke J Gietzen; Sarah J Ogilvie; Hans-Peter de Ruiter; Jens M Nygren
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2022-08-15

5.  Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation.

Authors:  Karin R Jongsma; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  AWOSE - A Process Model for Incorporating Ethical Analyses in Agile Systems Engineering.

Authors:  Benjamin Strenge; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.525

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.