Literature DB >> 27083215

US Smokers' Beliefs, Experiences and Perceptions of Different Cigarette Variants Before and After the FSPTCA Ban on Misleading Descriptors Such as "Light," "Mild," or "Low".

Hua-Hie Yong1, Ron Borland1, K Michael Cummings2, Eric N Lindblom3, Lin Li1, Maansi Bansal-Travers4, Richard J O'Connor4, Tara Elton-Marshall5,6,7, James F Thrasher8, David Hammond9, Mary E Thompson10, Timea R Partos11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In December 2008, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) took action that prompted the removal of nicotine and tar listings from cigarette packs and ads. As of June 2010, the US Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act prohibited the use of explicit or implicit descriptors on tobacco packaging or in advertising that convey messages of reduced risk or exposure, specifically including terms like "light," "mild," and "low" and similar descriptors. This study evaluates the effect of these two policy changes on smokers' beliefs, experiences and perceptions of different cigarettes.
METHODS: Using generalized estimating equations models, this study analyzed survey data collected between 2002 and 2013 by the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Study regarding US smokers' beliefs, experiences, and perceptions of different cigarettes.
RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2013, smoker misperceptions about "light" cigarettes being less harmful did not change significantly and remained substantial, especially among those who reported using lower-strength cigarettes. After the two policy changes, reported reliance on pack colors, color terms, and other product descriptors like "smooth" to determine cigarette strength style trended upward.
CONCLUSIONS: Policies implemented to reduce smoker misperceptions that some cigarettes are safer than others appear to have had little impact. Because of pack colors, color terms, descriptors such as "smooth," cigarette taste or feel, and possibly other characteristics, millions of smokers continue to believe, inaccurately, that they can reduce their harms and risks by smoking one cigarette brand or sub-brand instead of another, which may be delaying or reducing smoking cessation. IMPLICATIONS: What this study adds: This study confirms that US policies to reduce smoker misperceptions that some cigarettes are less harmful than others have not been successful. Following the removal of light/low descriptors and tar and nicotine numbers from cigarette packs and ads, pack colors, color words, other descriptors (eg, smooth), and sensory experiences of smoother or lighter taste have helped smokers to continue to identify their preferred cigarette brand styles and otherwise distinguish between which brands and styles they consider "lighter" or lower in tar and, mistakenly, less harmful than others. These findings provide additional evidence to support new enforcement or regulatory action to stop cigarettes and their packaging from misleading smokers about relative risk, which may be reducing or delaying quit attempts.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27083215      PMCID: PMC5055739          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  28 in total

Review 1.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project.

Authors:  G T Fong; K M Cummings; R Borland; G Hastings; A Hyland; G A Giovino; D Hammond; M E Thompson
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  What brands are US smokers under 25 choosing?

Authors:  R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  What was "light" and "mild" is now "smooth" and "fine": new labelling of Australian cigarettes.

Authors:  B King; R Borland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  What do Marlboro Lights smokers know about low-tar cigarettes?

Authors:  K Michael Cummings; Andrew Hyland; Maansi A Bansal; Gary A Giovino
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth.

Authors:  David Hammond; Martin Dockrell; Deborah Arnott; Alex Lee; Ann McNeill
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  Beyond light and mild: cigarette brand descriptors and perceptions of risk in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  Seema Mutti; David Hammond; Ron Borland; Michael K Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Smokers' sensory beliefs mediate the relation between smoking a light/low tar cigarette and perceptions of harm.

Authors:  Tara Elton-Marshall; Geoffrey T Fong; Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; Steve Shaowei Xu; Anne C K Quah; Guoze Feng; Yuan Jiang
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Relationship of cigarette-related perceptions to cigarette design features: findings from the 2009 ITC U.S. Survey.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Rosalie V Caruso; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Brian V Fix; Bill King; David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Has the tobacco industry evaded the FDA's ban on 'Light' cigarette descriptors?

Authors:  Gregory N Connolly; Hillel R Alpert
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  16 in total

1.  Which cigarettes do Americans think are safer? A population-based analysis with wave 1 of the PATH study.

Authors:  Eric C Leas; John W Ayers; David R Strong; John P Pierce
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Cigarette Filter Ventilation and its Relationship to Increasing Rates of Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Min-Ae Song; Neal L Benowitz; Micah Berman; Theodore M Brasky; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Catalin Marian; Richard O'Connor; Vaughan W Rees; Casper Woroszylo; Peter G Shields
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  U.S. adults' addiction and harm beliefs about nicotine and low nicotine cigarettes.

Authors:  Erin Keely O'Brien; Anh B Nguyen; Alexander Persoskie; Allison C Hoffman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Widespread Belief That Organic and Additive-Free Tobacco Products are Less Harmful Than Regular Tobacco Products: Results From the 2017 US Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Jennifer L Pearson; Meghan Moran; Cristine D Delnevo; Andrea C Villanti; M Jane Lewis
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 5.  The impact and relevance of tobacco control research in low-and middle-income countries globally and to the US.

Authors:  Carla J Berg; Geoffrey T Fong; James F Thrasher; Joanna E Cohen; Wasim Maziak; Harry Lando; Jeffrey Drope; Raul Mejia; Joaquin Barnoya; Rima Nakkash; Ramzi G Salloum; Mark Parascandola
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Assessing the Potential Impact of Cigarette Packs Designed for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Adults: A Randomized Experiment to Inform U.S. Regulation, 2018.

Authors:  Joseph G L Lee; Tiffany M Blanchflower; Kevin F O'Brien; Leslie E Cofie; Kyle R Gregory; Paige E Averett
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2020-01

7.  Smokers' awareness of filter ventilation, and how they believe it affects them: findings from the ITC Four Country Survey.

Authors:  Bill King; Ron Borland; Michael Le Grande; Richard O'Connor; Geoffrey Fong; Ann McNeill; Dorothy Hatsukami; Michael Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Flavors and Implied Reduced-Risk Descriptors in Cigar Ads at Stores Near Schools.

Authors:  Kymberle L Sterling; Monika Vishwakarma; Kimberly Ababseh; Lisa Henriksen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.825

9.  Evidence of Youth-Appealing Cigarette Advertising Tactics from a Randomized, Controlled Experiment.

Authors:  Meghan Bridgid Moran; Caitlin Weiger; Lauren Czaplicki; Kathryn Heley
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 5.825

10.  "Their Packaging Has Always Been Like a Power": A Qualitative Study of U.S. Smokers' Perceptions of Cigarette Pack Visual Design Features to Inform Product Regulation.

Authors:  Joseph G L Lee; Paige E Averett; Tiffany Blanchflower; Nunzio Landi; Kyle R Gregory
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.