Literature DB >> 35325239

Evidence of Youth-Appealing Cigarette Advertising Tactics from a Randomized, Controlled Experiment.

Meghan Bridgid Moran1, Caitlin Weiger1, Lauren Czaplicki1,2, Kathryn Heley3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Receptivity to tobacco advertising is an important component in the progression from exposure to advertising to use behavior, yet little is known about current tobacco advertising tactics that increase receptivity. This study tests the effect of three advertising features identified in earlier work as potentially appealing to adolescents and young adults: flora imagery, eco-friendly language, and sweepstakes. AIMS AND METHODS: We conducted an online survey in which 1,000 US adolescents (age 15-17) and 1,000 US young adults (age 18-24), equally stratified by smoking status, were exposed to three experimental modules manipulating presence/absence of each feature of interest on cigarette ads. After viewing each ad, participants reported their receptivity to the advertisement. Bivariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the effect of each appeal's presence on receptivity.
RESULTS: Adolescents (aOR = 1.55, 95%CI: 1.12-2.14) and young adults (aOR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.06-1.93) were more likely to be receptive to ads with flora imagery. The effect of sweepstakes on receptivity was modified by the specific ad for young adults. Ecofriendly language did not significantly impact receptivity among either group. Exploratory subgroup analysis found a significant ad by sweepstakes interaction among young adult noncurrent smokers.
CONCLUSION: These findings provide evidence that use of flora imagery increases cigarette advertising receptivity among adolescents and young adults, while the effect of sweepstakes on young adults might additionally depend on the ad shown. Restrictions on youth appealing advertising tactics, such as those identified in this study, as well as broader content-neutral advertising restriction policies, should be considered. IMPLICATIONS: This study provides evidence for the appeal of flora imagery in cigarette advertising for both adolescents and young adults, as well as the complexity of how use of sweepstakes interacts with branding in specific ads to predict receptivity among young adults. Because receptivity to cigarette advertising is a documented step in the pathway between advertising exposure and product use, restrictions on use of these tactics should be implemented, and broader content-neutral advertising restriction policies should be considered.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35325239      PMCID: PMC9575973          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   5.825


  21 in total

1.  Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents.

Authors:  K M Cummings; C P Morley; J K Horan; C Steger; N-R Leavell
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Which adolescents are most receptive to tobacco industry marketing? implications for counter-advertising campaigns.

Authors:  Janet Audrain-McGovern; Kenneth P Tercyak; Alexandra E Shields; Angelita Bush; Carlos Francisco Espinel; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2003

3.  The impact of cigarette package design on perceptions of risk.

Authors:  David Hammond; Carla Parkinson
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 2.341

4.  What do cigarette pack colors communicate to smokers in the U.S.?

Authors:  Maansi Bansal-Travers; Richard O'Connor; Brian V Fix; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Recalled Exposure to and Self-Reported Impact of Tobacco Marketing and Promotions.

Authors:  Meghan Bridgid Moran; Kathryn Heley; John P Pierce; Ray Niaura; David Strong; David Abrams
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-12-13

6.  US Smokers' Beliefs, Experiences and Perceptions of Different Cigarette Variants Before and After the FSPTCA Ban on Misleading Descriptors Such as "Light," "Mild," or "Low".

Authors:  Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Eric N Lindblom; Lin Li; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Richard J O'Connor; Tara Elton-Marshall; James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Mary E Thompson; Timea R Partos
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Targeting youth and concerned smokers: evidence from Canadian tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  R W Pollay
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Tobacco Advertising Features That May Contribute to Product Appeal Among US Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Meghan Bridgid Moran; Kathryn Heley; Lauren Czaplicki; Caitlin Weiger; David Strong; John Pierce
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies.

Authors:  Brennan C Kahan; Vipul Jairath; Caroline J Doré; Tim P Morris
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies.

Authors:  Ceyhan Ceran Serdar; Murat Cihan; Doğan Yücel; Muhittin A Serdar
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.