Literature DB >> 23943847

Relationship of cigarette-related perceptions to cigarette design features: findings from the 2009 ITC U.S. Survey.

Richard J O'Connor1, Rosalie V Caruso, Ron Borland, K Michael Cummings, Maansi Bansal-Travers, Brian V Fix, Bill King, David Hammond, Geoffrey T Fong.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many governments around the world have banned the use of misleading cigarette descriptors such as "light" and "mild" because the cigarettes so labeled were found not to reduce smokers' health risks. However, underlying cigarette design features, which are retained in many brands, likely contribute to ongoing belief that these cigarettes are less harmful by producing perceptions of lightness/smoothness through lighter taste and reduced harshness and irritation.
METHODS: Participants (N = 320) were recruited from the International Tobacco Control U.S. Survey conducted in 2009 and 2010, when they answered questions about smoking behavior, attitudes and beliefs about tobacco products, and key mediators and moderators of tobacco use behaviors. Participants also submitted an unopened pack of their usual brand of cigarettes for analysis using established methods.
RESULTS: Own-brand filter ventilation level (M 29%, range 0%-71%) was consistently associated with perceived lightness (p < .001) and smoothness (p = .005) of own brand. Those whose brand bore a light/mild label (55% of participants) were more likely to report their cigarettes were lighter [71.9% vs. 41.9%; χ(2)(2) = 38.1, p < .001] and smoother than other brands [75.5% vs. 68.7%; χ(2)(2) = 7.8, p = .020].
CONCLUSION: Product design features, particularly filter ventilation, influence smokers' beliefs about product attributes such as lightness and smoothness, independent of package labels. Regulation of cigarette design features such as filter ventilation should be considered as a complement to removal of misleading terms in order to reduce smokers' misperceptions regarding product risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23943847      PMCID: PMC3790631          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntt075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  25 in total

1.  Smokers' beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes.

Authors:  S Shiffman; J L Pillitteri; S L Burton; J M Rohay; J G Gitchell
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Use of and beliefs about light cigarettes in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey.

Authors:  Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Bill King; K Michael Cummings; Geoffrey T Fong; Tara Elton-Marshall; David Hammond; Ann McNeill
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Smokers' misperceptions of light and ultra-light cigarettes may keep them smoking.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; M E Goldberg; B A Yost; E L White; C T Sweeney; J L Pillitteri
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Smokers are unaware of the filter vents now on most cigarettes: results of a national survey.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; M E Goldberg; B A Yost; F M Ahern; K R Aronson; C T Sweeney
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Measuring the heaviness of smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; W Rickert; J Robinson
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1989-07

7.  Changes in overwrap and butt length of American filter cigarettes. An influence on reported tar yields.

Authors:  N E Grunberg; D E Morse; V A Maycock; L T Kozlowski
Journal:  N Y State J Med       Date:  1985-07

8.  Health impact of "reduced yield" cigarettes: a critical assessment of the epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  M J Thun; D M Burns
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 9.  The changing cigarette, 1950-1995.

Authors:  D Hoffmann; I Hoffmann
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1997-03

10.  Cigarette tar yields in relation to mortality from lung cancer in the cancer prevention study II prospective cohort, 1982-8.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Harris; Michael J Thun; Alison M Mondul; Eugenia E Calle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-10
View more
  16 in total

1.  Design Characteristics and Tobacco Metal Concentrations in Filtered Cigars.

Authors:  Rosalie V Caruso; Richard J O'Connor; Mark J Travers; Cristine D Delnevo; W Edryd Stephens
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  The Cigarette and Smokeless Tobacco Markets in Texas Relative to the United States.

Authors:  Erin J Miller Lo; Daniel P Giovenco; Olivia A Wackowski; Melissa B Harrell; Cheryl L Perry; Cristine D Delnevo
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2017-04-01

3.  Gender and racial differences in smoking of long/ultra-long and king size cigarettes among U.S. adult smokers, NHANES 1999-2012.

Authors:  Israel T Agaku; Constantine I Vardavas; Olalekan A Ayo-Yusuf; Hillel R Alpert; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Reduced nicotine content cigarette advertising: How false beliefs and subjective ratings affect smoking behavior.

Authors:  Melissa Mercincavage; Megan L Saddleson; Emily Gup; Angela Halstead; Darren Mays; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  US Smokers' Beliefs, Experiences and Perceptions of Different Cigarette Variants Before and After the FSPTCA Ban on Misleading Descriptors Such as "Light," "Mild," or "Low".

Authors:  Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Eric N Lindblom; Lin Li; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Richard J O'Connor; Tara Elton-Marshall; James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Mary E Thompson; Timea R Partos
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Smokers' sensory beliefs mediate the relation between smoking a light/low tar cigarette and perceptions of harm.

Authors:  Tara Elton-Marshall; Geoffrey T Fong; Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; Steve Shaowei Xu; Anne C K Quah; Guoze Feng; Yuan Jiang
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Changes in tar yields and cigarette design in samples of Chinese cigarettes, 2009 and 2012.

Authors:  Liane M Schneller; Benjamin A Zwierzchowski; Rosalie V Caruso; Qiang Li; Jiang Yuan; Geoffrey T Fong; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Differences in cigarette design and metal content across five countries: results from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Project.

Authors:  Rosalie V Caruso; Brian V Fix; James F Thrasher; K Michael Cummings; Geoffrey T Fong; W E Stephens; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-04-01

9.  Responses to reduced nicotine cigarette marketing features: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea C Johnson; Melissa Mercincavage; Valentina Souprountchouk; Sasha Rogelberg; Anupreet K Sidhu; Cristine D Delnevo; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Impact of Cigarette Filter Ventilation on U.S. Smokers' Perceptions and Biomarkers of Exposure and Potential Harm.

Authors:  Dana M Carroll; Irina Stepanov; Richard O'Connor; Xianghua Luo; K Michael Cummings; Vaughan W Rees; Warren K Bickel; Micah L Berman; David L Ashley; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Peter G Shields; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.