Literature DB >> 11893814

Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

L T Kozlowski1, R J O'Connor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review tobacco industry documents on filter ventilation in light of published studies and to explore the role of filter ventilation in the design of cigarettes that deliver higher smoke yields to smokers than would be expected from standard machine smoked tests (Federal Trade Commission (FTC), International Organization for Standardization (ISO)). DATA SOURCES: Searched from November 1999 to November 2000 internet databases of industry documents (www.pmdocs.com, www.rjrtdocs.com, www.lorillarddocs.com, www.bw.aalatg.com, www.cdc.gov/tobacco/industrydocs, www.tobaccodocuments.org, www.tobaccopapers.org, www.hlth.gov.bc.ca/Guildford, www.cctc.ca/ncth/Guildford, www.cctc.ca/ncth/Guildford2) for documents related to filter ventilation. Documents found dated from 1955 through 1994. STUDY SELECTION: Those documents judged to contain the most relevant information or data on filter ventilation related to cigarette taste and compensatory smoking, while also trying to avoid redundancy from various documents deriving from the same underlying data. DATA SYNTHESIS: Filter ventilation is a crucial design feature creating three main problems for lower tar cigarettes as measured by official smoking machine testing. Firstly, it misleadingly makes cigarettes taste lighter and milder, and, therefore, they appear less dangerous to smokers. Secondly, it promotes compensation mainly by facilitating the taking of larger puffs. Thirdly, for very heavily ventilated cigarettes (that is, > 65% filter air dilution), behavioural blocking of vents with lips or fingers is an additional contributor to compensatory smoking. These three effects are found in industry research as well as published research.
CONCLUSIONS: Filter ventilation is a dangerous, defective technology that should be abandoned in less hazardous nicotine delivery systems. Health interested groups should test cigarettes in a way that reflects compensatory smoking. Lower tar (vented filter) cigarettes should be actively countermarketed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11893814      PMCID: PMC1766061          DOI: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  37 in total

1.  Smoker reactions to a "radio message" that Light cigarettes are as dangerous as Regular cigarettes.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; M E Goldberg; C T Sweeney; R F Palmer; J L Pillitteri; B A Yost; E L White; M M Stine
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Applying the risk/use equilibrium: use medicinal nicotine now for harm reduction.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; A A Strasser; G A Giovino; P A Erickson; J V Terza
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Fire injuries, disasters, and costs from cigarettes and cigarette lights: a global overview.

Authors:  B N Leistikow; D C Martin; C E Milano
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Nicotine yield from machine-smoked cigarettes and nicotine intakes in smokers: evidence from a representative population survey.

Authors:  M J Jarvis; R Boreham; P Primatesta; C Feyerabend; A Bryant
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-01-17       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Smokers, non-smokers, and low-tar smoke.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Filter ventilation and nicotine content of tobacco in cigarettes from Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; N Y Mehta; C T Sweeney; S S Schwartz; G P Vogler; M J Jarvis; R J West
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Adjustment of smokers to dilution of tobacco smoke by ventilated cigarette holders.

Authors:  S R Sutton; C Feyerabend; P V Cole; M A Russell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  The misuse of 'less-hazardous' cigarettes and its detection: hole-blocking of ventilated filters.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; V Khouw; M A Pope
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Effect of filter vent blocking on carbon monoxide exposure from selected lower tar cigarette brands.

Authors:  C T Sweeney; L T Kozlowski; P Parsa
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  A further study of FTC yield and nicotine absorption in smokers.

Authors:  G D Byrd; R A Davis; W S Caldwell; J H Robinson; J D deBethizy
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  95 in total

1.  The Canadian slave smoking machine.

Authors:  Michael O Chaiton
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

2.  A Premiere example of the illusion of harm reduction cigarettes in the 1990s.

Authors:  R W Pollay; T Dewhirst
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Publishing tobacco tar measurements on packets.

Authors:  Nigel Gray; Peter Boyle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-09

4.  Randomized Trial of Reduced-Nicotine Standards for Cigarettes.

Authors:  Eric C Donny; Rachel L Denlinger; Jennifer W Tidey; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Neal L Benowitz; Ryan G Vandrey; Mustafa al'Absi; Steven G Carmella; Paul M Cinciripini; Sarah S Dermody; David J Drobes; Stephen S Hecht; Joni Jensen; Tonya Lane; Chap T Le; F Joseph McClernon; Ivan D Montoya; Sharon E Murphy; Jason D Robinson; Maxine L Stitzer; Andrew A Strasser; Hilary Tindle; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Cigarette characteristic and emission variations across high-, middle- and low-income countries.

Authors:  R J O'Connor; K J Wilkins; R V Caruso; K M Cummings; L T Kozlowski
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.427

Review 6.  Reconciling human smoking behavior and machine smoking patterns: implications for understanding smoking behavior and the impact on laboratory studies.

Authors:  Catalin Marian; Richard J O'Connor; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Vaughan W Rees; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Surveillance methods for identifying, characterizing, and monitoring tobacco products: potential reduced exposure products as an example.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly; Kaila J Norton; David Sweanor; Mark Parascandola; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Maxine L Stitzer; Jack E Henningfield; Rich J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Assessing consumer responses to potential reduced-exposure tobacco products: a review of tobacco industry and independent research methods.

Authors:  Vaughan W Rees; Jennifer M Kreslake; K Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Mark Parascandola; Peter G Shields; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Cigarette filter-based assays as proxies for toxicant exposure and smoking behavior--a literature review.

Authors:  John L Pauly; Richard J O'Connor; Geraldine M Paszkiewicz; K Michael Cummings; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.