Literature DB >> 15799595

What do Marlboro Lights smokers know about low-tar cigarettes?

K Michael Cummings1, Andrew Hyland, Maansi A Bansal, Gary A Giovino.   

Abstract

The present study examined the extent to which Marlboro Lights smokers perceive lower health risks associated with using a low-tar cigarette and the extent to which they are aware of filter vents in their cigarettes. The data for this study came from a nationally representative random-digit-dialed telephone survey of 1,046 adult current cigarette smokers (aged 18 years or older) conducted between May and September 2001. Respondents were asked about the brand and type of cigarettes smoked, beliefs about the health benefits associated with low-tar and filtered cigarettes, and awareness of ventilation holes in the filters of their cigarettes. Marlboro Lights was the most popular brand, smoked by 19% of survey respondents. Only 32% of Marlboro Lights smokers reported that the filters on their cigarettes were ventilated. Many Marlboro Lights smokers believed incorrectly that lower tar, light, and ultra-light cigarettes were less harmful compared with higher tar, full-flavored cigarettes. For example, only 11% of Marlboro Lights smokers knew that the tar delivery of a light cigarette was about the same as that of a full-flavored cigarette. The responses of Marlboro Lights smokers to questions about the hazards of low-tar cigarettes were similar to those expressed by smokers of other cigarette brands. The data presented in this paper reveal that smokers of the leading light cigarette brand sold in the United States today, Marlboro Lights, are for the most part unaware of filter vents in the cigarettes they smoke and are misinformed about the health risk of using low-tar and filtered cigarettes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15799595     DOI: 10.1080/14622200412331320725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  27 in total

1.  Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  D Hammond; G T Fong; A McNeill; R Borland; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Educating smokers about their cigarettes and nicotine medications.

Authors:  Maansi Bansal-Travers; K Michael Cummings; Andrew Hyland; Anthony Brown; Paula Celestino
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2010-01-11

3.  What happened to smokers' beliefs about light cigarettes when "light/mild" brand descriptors were banned in the UK? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  R Borland; G T Fong; H-H Yong; K M Cummings; D Hammond; B King; M Siahpush; A McNeill; G Hastings; R J O'Connor; T Elton-Marshall; M P Zanna
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Adult interest in using a hypothetical modified risk tobacco product: findings from wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2013-14).

Authors:  Jennifer L Pearson; Amanda L Johnson; Sarah E Johnson; Cassandra A Stanton; Andrea C Villanti; Raymond S Niaura; Allison M Glasser; Baoguang Wang; David B Abrams; K Michael Cummings; Andrew Hyland
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Awareness of FDA-mandated cigarette packaging changes among smokers of 'light' cigarettes.

Authors:  M Falcone; M Bansal-Travers; P M Sanborn; K Z Tang; A A Strasser
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-12-08

6.  The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S.

Authors:  Maansi Bansal-Travers; David Hammond; Philip Smith; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  Surveillance methods for identifying, characterizing, and monitoring tobacco products: potential reduced exposure products as an example.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly; Kaila J Norton; David Sweanor; Mark Parascandola; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Assessing consumer responses to potential reduced-exposure tobacco products: a review of tobacco industry and independent research methods.

Authors:  Vaughan W Rees; Jennifer M Kreslake; K Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Mark Parascandola; Peter G Shields; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Stealing a march in the 21st century: accelerating progress in the 100-year war against tobacco addiction in the United States.

Authors:  Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Misperceptions of "light" cigarettes abound: national survey data.

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Deepa Weerasekera; Jo Peace; Richard Edwards; George Thomson; Miranda Devlin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.