Literature DB >> 23147624

Rate of correction after asymmetrical physeal suppression in valgus deformity: analysis using a linear mixed model application.

Ki Hyuk Sung1, Soyeon Ahn, Chin Youb Chung, Kyoung Min Lee, Tae Won Kim, Ho Sung Han, Dae Ha Kim, In Ho Choi, Tae-Joon Cho, Won Joon Yoo, Moon Seok Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to estimate the rate of angular correction after asymmetrical physeal suppression and analyze the factors that influence the rate of correction by using a linear mixed model application.
METHODS: A total of 175 physes (72 distal femoral, 70 proximal tibial, and 33 distal tibial) from 78 consecutive patients with valgus angular deformity of the lower limb who underwent asymmetrical physeal suppression were included. The anatomic lateral distal femoral angle, the anatomic lateral proximal tibial angle, and the anatomic lateral distal tibial angle were measured from the teleroentgenograms of the patients' preoperative visit and periodic follow-ups. The rate of angular correction was adjusted by multiple factors by using a linear mixed model with age, sex, and surgical method as the fixed effects and each subject as the random effect. The final model included the age-specific and surgical method-specific rate and sex-specific and surgical method-specific intercept. Multivariate analysis was performed for this model.
RESULTS: In younger children (boys 14 y or younger and girls 12 y or younger), the rate of correction of valgus deformity at the distal femur, proximal tibia, and distal tibia was 0.71 degrees/month (8.5 degrees/y), 0.40 degrees/month (4.8 degrees/y), and 0.48 degrees/month (5.8 degrees/y), respectively. In older children, the rate of correction of valgus deformity at the distal femur, proximal tibia, and distal tibia was 0.39 degrees/month (4.7 degrees/y), 0.29 degrees/month (3.5 degrees/y), and 0.48 degrees/month (5.8 degrees/y), respectively. The rate of correction at the distal femur was significantly lower in older children (P = 0.025). The rate of angular correction at the proximal tibia was significantly faster in the screw group than in the staple group (P = 0.046).
CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetrical physeal suppression with staples, percutaneous transphyseal screws, and permanent method all are effective methods for treating valgus deformity in growing children. When we treat valgus deformity in growing children, we should take into consideration the fact that the rate of correction at the distal femur is lower in older children, and that at the proximal tibia is faster in the screw group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23147624     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318273e411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  4 in total

1.  Prospective comparative study of two methods for fixation after distal femur corrective osteotomy for valgus deformity; retrograde intramedullary nailing versus less invasive stabilization system plating.

Authors:  Çağrı Özcan; Sami Sökücü; Kubilay Beng; Engin Çetinkaya; Bilal Demir; Yavuz Selim Kabukçuoğlu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  CORR Synthesis: Can Guided Growth for Angular Deformity Correction Be Applied to Management of Pediatric Patellofemoral Instability?

Authors:  Kenneth M Lin; Peter D Fabricant
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  Multiplier method may be unreliable to predict the timing of temporary hemiepiphysiodesis for coronal angular deformity.

Authors:  Zhenkai Wu; Jing Ding; Dahang Zhao; Li Zhao; Hai Li; Jianlin Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Persistent Lower Limb Deformities Despite Amelioration of Rickets in X-Linked Hypophosphatemia (XLH) - A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Gabriel T Mindler; Alexandra Stauffer; Andreas Kranzl; Stefan Penzkofer; Rudolf Ganger; Christof Radler; Gabriele Haeusler; Adalbert Raimann
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.055

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.