Literature DB >> 34022860

Immersion in Raloxifene does not significantly improve bone toughness or screw pull-out strength in multiple in vitro models.

Michael R Eby1, Danielle M Cristino2, Matthew Counihan1, Kendall M Masada1, Jaimo Ahn3, Michael W Hast4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failure of surgical fixation in orthopaedic fractures occurs at a significantly higher rate in osteoporotic patients due to weakened osteoporotic bone. A therapy to acutely improve the mechanical properties of bone during fracture repair would have profound clinical impact. A previous study has demonstrated an increase in mechanical properties of acellular cortical canine bone after immersion in raloxifene. The goal of this study was to determine if similar treatment yields the same results in cancellous fetal bovine bone and whether this translates into a difference in screw pull-out strength in human cadaveric tissue.
METHODS: Cancellous bone from fetal bovine distal femora underwent quasi-static four-point bending tests after being immersed in either raloxifene (20 μM) or phosphate-buffered saline as a control for 7 days (n = 10). Separately, 5 matched pairs of human osteoporotic cadaveric humeral heads underwent the same procedure. Five 3.5 mm unicortical cancellous screws were then inserted at standard surgical fixation locations to a depth of 30 mm and quasi-static screw pull-out tests were performed.
RESULTS: In the four-point bending tests, there were no significant differences between the raloxifene and control groups for any of the mechanical properties - including stiffness (p = 0.333) and toughness (p = 0.546). In the screw pull-out tests, the raloxifene soaked samples and control samples had pullout strengths of 122 ± 74.3 N and 89.5 ± 63.8 N, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study indicate that cancellous fetal bovine samples did not demonstrate an increase in toughness with raloxifene treatment, which is in contrast to previously published data that studied canine cortical bone. In vivo experiments are likely required to determine whether raloxifene will improve implant fixation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Cadaveric; Fracture repair; Proximal humerus; Raloxifene

Year:  2021        PMID: 34022860     DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04342-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  27 in total

Review 1.  Internal fracture fixation in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Charles N Cornell
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Robert C Sproul; Jaicharan J Iyengar; Zlatko Devcic; Brian T Feeley
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Economic and social impact of upper extremity fragility fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Vani J Sabesan; Tom Valikodath; Abby Childs; Vinay K Sharma
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Treatment of comminuted proximal humeral fractures using locking plate with strut allograft.

Authors:  Hongeun Cha; Ki-Beom Park; Seungbae Oh; Jinyoung Jeong
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine.

Authors:  Nicole C Wright; Anne C Looker; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis; Elizabeth S Delzell; Susan Randall; Bess Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Burden of illness for osteoporotic fractures compared with other serious diseases among postmenopausal women in the United States.

Authors:  Andrea Singer; Alex Exuzides; Leslie Spangler; Cynthia O'Malley; Chris Colby; Karissa Johnston; Irene Agodoa; Jessica Baker; Risa Kagan
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rose M Collard; Han Boter; Robert A Schoevers; Richard C Oude Voshaar
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 9.  Evaluation of the osteoporotic proximal humeral fracture and strategies for structural augmentation during surgical treatment.

Authors:  Surena Namdari; Pramod B Voleti; Samir Mehta
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Mechanical Effects of Bone Substitute and Far-Cortical Locking Techniques in 2-Part Proximal Humerus Fracture Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Michael W Hast; Matthew Chin; Elaine C Schmidt; Jennifer Sanville; George Karl Van Osten; Samir Mehta
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bone hydration: How we can evaluate it, what can it tell us, and is it an effective therapeutic target?

Authors:  Rachel K Surowiec; Matthew R Allen; Joseph M Wallace
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-12-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.